Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:33:54.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marketisation of Nordic Eldercare – Is the Model Still Universal?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2016

LINDA MOBERG
LINDA MOBERG*
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Uppsala University, Box 514, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden e-mail: linda.moberg@statsvet.uu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this article is to analyse whether the increased reliance on marketisation in the provision of social care challenges the universality of eldercare in Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Norway. The study focuses on national reforms for contracting out and user choice of provider, analysing their consequences for four universalistic dimensions: (i) equal inclusion, (ii) public funding, (iii) public provision and (iv) comprehensive usage. The findings suggest that, although need-based inclusion and public funding remain key principles in all four countries, there is an increased reliance on private provision in Sweden, Denmark and Finland. In addition, the introduction of topping-up services challenges the dimension of comprehensive usage by enabling users with economic resources to turn to the private market to increase the comprehensiveness and quality of their care.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 603 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Anttonen, A. (2002), ‘Universalism and social policy: a Nordic-feminist revaluation’, NORA: Nordic Journal of Women's Studies, 10:2, 37–41.Google Scholar
Anttonen, A. and Häikiö, L. (2011), ‘Care “going market”: Finnish elderly-care policies in transition’, Nordic Journal of Social Research, Special issue, 70–90.Google Scholar
Anttonen, A., Häikiö, L. and Stefánsson, K. (eds.) (2012a), Welfare State, Universalism and Diversity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Anttonen, A., Häikiö, L., Stefánsson, K. and Sipilä, J. (2012b), ‘Universalism and the challenge of diversity’, in Anttonen, A., Häikiö, L., and Stefánsson, K. (eds.), Welfare State, Universalism and Diversity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anttonen, A. and Sipilä, J. (2012), ‘Universalism in the British and Scandinavian social policy debates’, in Anttonen, A., Häikiö, L., and Stefánsson, K. (eds.), Welfare State, Universalism and Diversity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 16–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D., Blomqvist, P., Goul-Andersen, J., Palme, J. and Waddan, A. (2014), ‘The universal decline of universality? Social policy change in Canada, Denmark, Sweden and the UK’, Social Policy & Administration, 48:7, 739–56.Google Scholar
Bertelsen, T.M. and Rostgaard, T. (2013), ‘Marketisation in eldercare in Denmark: free choice and the quest for quality and efficiency’, in Meagher, G. and Szebehely, M. (eds.), Marketisation in Nordic Eldercare. Stockholm: Stockholm University, pp. 127–61.Google Scholar
Blomqvist, P. (2016), ‘NPM i välfärdsstaten: hotas universalismen?’, Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, 118:1, 39–67.Google Scholar
Blomqvist, P. and Palme, J. (2015), ‘Universalism in Swedish Welfare Policy 1990–2014’, Paper presented to the RC19-conference, Bath 26–28 August 2015.Google Scholar
Brady, H. E. and Collier, D. (2010), Rethinking Social Inquiry - Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publisher.Google Scholar
Daly, M. and Lewis, J. (2000), ‘The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states’, The British journal of sociology, 51:2, 281–98.Google Scholar
Erlandsson, S., Storm, P., Stranz, A., Szebehely, M. and Trydegård, G.B. (2013), ‘Marketising trends in Swedish eldercare: completion, choice and calls for stricter regulation’, in Meagher, G. and Szebehely, M. (eds.), Marketisation in Nordic eldercare, Stockholm: Stockholm University, pp. 23–83.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fernandez, J.L., Kendall, J., Davey, V. and Knapp, M.R.J. (2007), ‘Direct payments in England: Factors linked to variations in local provision’, Journal of Social Policy, 36:01, 97–121.Google Scholar
Goul-Andersen, J. (2012), ‘The Concept of Universalism and its Operationalization in a Mixed Economy of Welfare’, CCWS Working paper no. 2012–81, Aalborg.Google Scholar
Jordahl, H. and Öhrvall, R. (2013), ’Nationella reformer och lokala initiativ’, in Jordahl, H. (ed.), Välfärdstjänster i privat regi: framväxt och drivkrafter, Stockholm: SNS, pp. 33–87.Google Scholar
Karsio, O. and Anttonen, A. (2013), ‘Marketisation of eldercare in Finland: legal frames, outsourcing practices and the rapid growth of for-profit services’, in Meagher, G. and Szebehely, M. (eds.), Marketisation in Nordic eldercare. Stockholm: Stockholm University, pp. 85–125.Google Scholar
Kildal, N. and Kuhnle, S. (2005a), Normative Foundations of the Welfare State: the Nordic Experience, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kildal, N. and Kuhnle, S. (2005b), ‘The principle of universalism: tracing a key idea in the Scandinavian welfare model’, in Standing, G. (ed.), Promoting Income Security as a Right: Europe and North America, London: Anthem Press, pp. 303–26.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (1998), ‘The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the western countries’, American Sociological Review, 63:5, 661–87.Google Scholar
FoU, KS. (2013), Friere Brukervalg i Hjemmetjenesten, Slutrapport 12.04.2013.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. and Bartlett, W. (1993), Quasi-markets and social policy, London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, T.H. (1964), Class, Citizenship and Social Development, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Meagher, G. and Szebehely, M. (eds.) (2013), Marketisation in Nordic Eldercare, Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
National Board of Health and Welfare (2015), Äldre och Personer med Funktionsnedsättning – Regiform År 2014, Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.Google Scholar
NHO Service (2012), Omsorgstjenester, Bransjestatistikk 2012.Google Scholar
Øien, H., Karlsson, M. and Iversen, T. (2012), ‘The impact of financial incentives on the composition of long-term care in Norway’, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 34:2, 258–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C. and Bouckhaert, G. (2011), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rauch, D. (2007), ‘Is there really a Scandinavian social service model? A comparison of childcare and eldercare in six European countries’, Acta Sociologica, 50:3, 249–69.Google Scholar
Rostgaard, T. (2011), ‘Care as you like it: the construction of a consumer approach in home care in Denmark’, Nordic Journal of Social Research, Special Issue, 54–69.Google Scholar
Sipilä, J. (ed.) (1997), Social Care Services: The Key to the Scandinavian Model, Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Stevens, M., Glendinning, C., Jacobs, S., Moran, N., Challis, D., Manthorpe, J., Fernandez, J.L., Jones, K., Knapp, M., Netten, A. and Wilberforce, M. (2011), ‘Assessing the Role of Increasing Choice in English Social Care Services’, Journal of Social Policy, 40:02, 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedish Association for Local Authorities (2004), Kommunernas Marknadsanvändning År 2002, Stockholm: Svenska Kommunförbundet.Google Scholar
Swedish Competition Agency (2015), Siffror och fakta om offentlig upphandling, Stockholm: Konkurrensverket.Google Scholar
Swedish Competition Agency (2013), Kommunernas Valfrihetssystem – med Focus på Hemtjänsten, Stockholm: Konkurrensverket.Google Scholar
Szebehely, M. and Trydegård, G.B. (2012), ‘Home care for older people in Sweden: a universal model in transition’, Health & social care in the community, 20:3, 300–09.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2008), ‘Choice and Values: Individualised Rational Action and Social Goals’, Journal of Social Policy, 37:02, 167–85.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R.M. (1976), ‘Universal and selective social services’, In Titmuss, R.M. (ed.), Commitment to Welfare, London: Georg Allen & Unwin, pp. 113–23.Google Scholar
Trydegård, G.B. (2001), ‘Välfärdstjänster till salu - privatisering och alternativa driftsformer under 1990-talet’, in Szebehely, M. (ed.), Välfärdstjänster i Omvandling, Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer, pp. 77–140.Google Scholar
Vabo, S.I. and Burau, V. (2011), ‘Universalism and the local organisation of elderly care’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31:3/4, 173–84.Google Scholar
Vabø, M. (2006), ‘Caring for people or caring for proxy consumers?’, European Societies, 8:3, 403–22.Google Scholar
Vabø, M., Christensen, K., Fadnes Jacobsen, F. and Dalby Trætteberg, H. (2013), ‘Marketisation in Norwegian eldercare: preconditions, trends and resistance’, in Meagher, G. and Szebehely, M. (eds.), Marketisation in Nordic eldercare, Stockholm: Stockholm University, pp. 163–202.Google Scholar
Vabø, M. and Szebehely, M. (2012), ‘A caring state for all older people?’, in Anttonen, A., Häikiö, L., and Stefánsson, K. (eds.), Welfare State, Universalism and Diversity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 121–43.Google Scholar
Vuorenkoski, L. (2009), Vouchers in social and health care - follow up 2, Health Policy Monitor. Available at http://hpm.org/fi/a13/1.pdf (2016-10-28)Google Scholar

Primary sourcesSweden

Governmental bill (2008), Regeringens proposition 2008/09:29 Lag om valfrihetssystem.Google Scholar
Governmental bill (1992), Regeringens proposition 1992/93:43 Ökad konkurrens i kommunal verksamhet Google Scholar
SFS 2001:453, SocialtjänstlagenGoogle Scholar
SFS 2008:962, Lag om valfrihetssystemGoogle Scholar

Denmark

Act 399 06/06/2002, Lov om ændring af lov om social service Google Scholar
Act 329 18/05/2005, Lov om ændring af lov om social service Google Scholar
Act 550 18/06/2012, Lov om frikommuner Google Scholar
Act 326 23/03/2013, Lov om ændring af lov om social service Google Scholar
Act 150 16/02/2015, Serviceloven Google Scholar

Finland

Act 23.12.1992/1505, Laki julkisista hankinnoista (lag om offentlig upphandling) Google Scholar
Act 24.7.2009/569, Laki sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon palvelusetelistä (lag om servicesedlar inom social- och hälsovården) Google Scholar
Governmental Bill (2009) Hallituksen esitys Eduskunnalle 20/2009: laeiksi sosiaali- ja terveyden-huollon palvelusetelistä (Regeringes proposition till Riksdagen 20/2009: Förslag till lag om servicesedlar inom social- och hälsovården)Google Scholar

Norway

Act 1999-07-16-69, Lov om offentlige anskaffelser Google Scholar
Act 2011-06-24-30, Helseog omsorgstjenesteloven Google Scholar