Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:16:48.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Men Taking Up Career Leave: An Opportunity for a Better Work and Family Life Balance?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

JESSIE VANDEWEYER
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium email: jessie.vandeweyer@vub.ac.be
IGNACE GLORIEUX
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium email: ignace.glorieux@vub.ac.be

Abstract

In 2004, 9 per cent of female employees took advantage of the system of ‘career break’ or ‘time credit’ in Flanders, compared to only 3 per cent of male workers. Although the number of men taking a career break is increasing, they remain a small group. In this article the time use of men interrupting their careers full-time or part-time is compared to that of full-time working men, using representative time use data from 2004. Analyses show that a career break does not imply a reduced workload. Half of the men interrupting their career full-time do so to try out another job. Men who take part-time leave are mainly motivated by their desire for a better work and family life balance. About 80 per cent of the time they gain by working on a part-time basis is allocated to household and childcare activities. This suggests that encouraging men to work fewer hours could well be the best policy for achieving gender equality.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anttila, T., Nätti, J. and Väisänen, M. (2005), ‘The experiments of reduced working hours in Finland. Impact on work-family interaction and the importance of the sociocultural setting’, Community, Work and Family, 8: 2, 187209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anxo, D. and O'Reilly, J. (2002), ‘Working-time transitions and transitional labour markets’, in Schmid, G. and Gazier, B. (eds), The Dynamics of Full Employment: Social Integration through Transitional Labour Markets, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Baird, C. and Reynolds, J. (2004), ‘Employee awareness of family leave benefits: the effects of family, work and gender’, The Sociological Quarterly, 45: 2, 325–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C. and Robinson, J. P. (2000), ‘Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor’, Social Forces, 79: 1, 191228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandth, B. and Kvande, E. (1998), ‘Masculinity and child care: the reconstruction of fathering’, Sociological Review, 46: 2, 293313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandth, B. and Kvande, E. (2001), ‘Flexible work and flexible fathers’, Work, Employment and Society, 15: 2, 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandth, B. and Kvande, E. (2002), ‘Reflexive fathers: negotiating parental leave and working life’, Gender, Work and Organization, 9: 2, 186203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bygren, M. and Duvander, A.-Z. (2006), ‘Parents’ workplace situation and fathers’ parental leave use’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 68: May, 363–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, K. and Staines, G. (1990), ‘Flextime: a viable solution to work/family conflict?’, Journal of Family Issues, 11: 4, 455–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, L. (2006), ‘Does father care mean fathers share? A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with children’, Gender and Society, 20: 2 (April), 259–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, B. (1995), Het effect van arbeidsherverdeling op de positie van vrouwen op de arbeidsmarkt: Een analyse aan de hand van loopbaanonderbreking, Antwerpen: Research Instituut voor Arbeid en Tewerkstelling vzw.Google Scholar
Derks, A., Elchardus, M., Glorieux, I. and Pelleriaux, K. (1997), ‘De paradox van de individualisering van werkloosheid’, Tijdschrift voor Sociologie, 18: 3, 327–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dermott, E. (2001), ‘New fatherhood in practice? Parental leave in the UK’, The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 21: 4–6, 145–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmet, B., Glorieux, I. and Vandeweyer, J. (2006), Technisch verslag bij het onderzoek ‘Loopbaanonderbrekers onder de loep: Een onderzoek naar de leefsituatie en tijdsbesteding van gebruikers van het tijdskrediet in Vlaanderen’, Brussels: Research Group TOR, Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit, Brussels.Google Scholar
Deven, F. and Moss, P. (2002), ‘Leave arrangements for parents: overview and future outlook’, Community, Work and Family, 5: 3, 237–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deven, F. and Moss, P. (eds) (2005), Leave Policies and Research: Reviews and Country Notes, CBGS-Werkdocument 2005/3, Brussels: CBGS.Google Scholar
Devisscher, S. (2004), The Career Break (Time Credit) Scheme in Belgium and the Incentive Premiums by the Flemish Government: Discussion Paper EC Peer Review, February 2004 Brussels: IDEA Consult.Google Scholar
Elchardus, M. and Glorieux, I. (1995), Niet aan de arbeid voorbij: De werkloosheidservaring als reflectie over arbeid, solidariteit en sociale cohesie, Brussels: VUBPress.Google Scholar
European Commission (2004), How Europeans Spend their Time: Everyday Life of Women and Men – Data 1998–2002, Luxemburg: EC Eurostat Pocketbook.Google Scholar
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2006), Part–time Work in Europe, Dublin: Eurofound.Google Scholar
Evandrou, M. and Glaser, K. (2003), ‘Combining work and family life: the pension penalty of caring’, Ageing and Society, 23, 583601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FOD Economie – Afdeling Statistiek, Enquête naar de arbeidskrachten, http://statbel.fgov.be/figures/d31_nl.asp#1 (accessed on 3 March (2006).Google Scholar
Gershuny, J., Bittman, M. and Brice, J. (2005), ‘Exit, voice, and suffering: do couples adapt to changing employment patterns?’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 67: August, 656–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geurts, K. and Van Woensel, A. (2005), Genderzakboekje. Zij en hij op de arbeidsmarkt, Leuven: Steunpunt Werkgelegenheid, Arbeid en Vorming.Google Scholar
Glorieux, I. (1995), Arbeid als zingever: Een onderzoek naar de betekenis van arbeid in het leven van mannen en vrouwen, Brussels: VUBPress.Google Scholar
Glorieux, I. and Vandeweyer, J. (2002). ‘Belgian men and women, a world of difference’, in Federal Ministry of Employment and Labour (ed.), Women and Men in Belgium: Towards an Equal Society, Brussels: Federal Ministry of Employment and Labour.Google Scholar
Glorieux, I., Minnen, J. and Vandeweyer, J. (2005), De tijd staat niet stil: Veranderingen in de tijdsbesteding van Vlamingen tussen 1999 en 2004, Research Group TOR, Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar
Glorieux, I., Koelet, S., Mestdag, I., Minnen, J., Moens, M. and Vandeweyer, J. (2006), De 24 uur van Vlaanderen: Het dagelijkse leven van minuut tot minuut, Tielt: LannooCampus.Google Scholar
Haas, L. (2003), ‘Parental leave and gender equality: lessons from the European Union’, Review of Policy Research, 20: 1, 89114.Google Scholar
Haas, L., Allard, K. and Hwang, P. (2002), ‘The impact of organizational culture on men's use of parental leave in Sweden’, Community, Work and Family, 5: 3, 319–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., Ferris, M. and Weitzman, M. (2001), ‘Finding an extra day a week: the positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance’, Family Relations, 50: 1, 4958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, A. R. (1989), The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home, New York: Viking.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1997), ‘Part-time work: solution or trap?’, International Labour Review. Perspectives, 136: 4.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. A. and Gerson, K. (2001), ‘Overworked individuals or overworked families. explaining trends in work, leisure and family time’, Work and Occupations, 28: 1, 4063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koelet, S. (2005), ‘Standvastige verschillen: Een analyse van theoretische benaderingen over de verdeling van het huishoudelijk werk tussen vrouwen en mannen op basis van tijdsbudgetonderzoek’, Ph.D., Research Group TOR, Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar
Lewis, S. (1997), ‘“Family friendly” employment policies: a route to changing organizational culture or playing about the margins?’, Gender, Work and Organization, 4: 1, 1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maume, D. J. (2006), ‘Gender differences in restricting work efforts because of family responsibilities’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 68: 4, 859–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennino, S. F. and Brayfield, A. (2002), ‘Job–family trade-offs. the multidimensional effects of gender’, Work and Occupations, 29: 2, 226–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulders, D. and Plasman, R. (2002). ‘Women's place in the working world’, in Federal Ministry of Employment and Labour (ed.), Women and Men in Belgium: Towards an equal society, Brussels: Federal Ministry of Employment and Labour.Google Scholar
Moss, P. and O'Brien, M. (eds) (2006), International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 200, Employment Relations Research Series No. 57, London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Noonan, M. C., Estes, S. B. and Glass, J. C. (2007), ‘Do workplace flexibility policies influence time spent in domestic labor’, Journal of Family Issues, 28: 2, 263–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osnowitz, D. (2005), ‘Managing time in domestic space: home-based contractors and household work’, Gender and Society, 19: 1, 83103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papalexandris, N. and Kramar, R. (1997), ‘Flexible working patterns: towards reconciliation of family and work’, Employee Relations, 19: 6, 581–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry-Jenkins, M., Goldberg, A., Pierce, C. and Sayer, A. (2007), ‘Shift work, role overload, and the transition to parenthood’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 69: 1, 123–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitt-Catsouphes, M. and Christensen, K. (2004), ‘Unmasking the taken for granted’, Community, Work and Family, 7: 2, 123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, J. (2005), ‘In the face of conflict: work–life conflict and desired work hour adjustments’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 67: 5, 1313–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, L. C. (2005), ‘Gender, time and inequality’, Social Forces, 84: 1, 285303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, G. (1998), Transitional Labour Markets: A New European Employment Strategy, Discussion Paper FS I 98-206, Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
Schmid, G. and Gazier, B. (2002), The Dynamics of Full Employment: Social Integration through Transitional Labour Markets, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seward, R. R., Yeatts, D. E, Zottarelli, L. K. and Fletcher, R. G. (2006), ‘Fathers taking parental leave and their involvement with children: an exploratory study’, Community, Work and Family, 9: 1, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, A. (2004), ‘Chronic presenteeism: the multiple dimensions to men's absence from part-time work’, Gender, Work and Organization, 11: 2, 207–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, H. (1993), ‘Homework and domestic work’, Sociological Forum, 8: 2, 181204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, C. and Lewis, S. (2001), ‘Home-based telework, gender, and the synchronization of work and family: perspectives of teleworkers and their co-residents’, Gender, Work and Organization, 8: 2, 123–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strazdins, L., Clements, M., Korda, R., Broom, D. and D'Souza, R. (2006), ‘Unsociable work? Nonstandard work schedules, family relationships, and children's well-being’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 68: 2, 394410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, C. and Lewis, S. (2001), ‘Home-based telework, gender, and the synchronization of work and family: perspectives of teleworkers and their co-residents’, Gender, Work and Organization, 8: 2, 123–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderweyden, K. (2002), Is er leven zonder werk? Over minder werken en sociale integratie op de drempel van de eenentwintigste eeuw, Leuven/Leiden: Acco.Google Scholar