Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:22:30.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Models of Carers: How Do Social Care Agencies Conceptualise Their Relationship with Informal Carers?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Julia Twigg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Carers occupy an ambiguous position within the social care system. Services are predominantly structured around the dependant rather than the carer, and this has important consequences for their delivery and evaluation. Many of the problems that arise in thinking about carer issues relate to confusion over the way the relationship between social care agencies and informal carers should be perceived. The paper outlines three models that provide frames of reference for this relationship: carers as resources; carers as co-workers; and carers as co-clients. The tensions between these are then used to explore the contradictions of policy in this field.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 53 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrams, P. (1977). ‘Community care: some research problems and priorities’, Policy and Politics, 6:2125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. and Bulmer, M. (1985). ‘Policies to promote informal social care: some reflections on voluntary neighbourhood involvement and neighbourhood care’, Ageing and Society, 5:11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, G. (1983), ‘Informal networks of care: issues raised by Barclay’, British Journal of Social Work, 13, 417–433.Google Scholar
Bayley, Michael (1973), Mental Handicap and Community Care, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Bayley, Michael (1982), ‘Helping care to happen in the city’, in Walker, A. (ed.). Community Care: The Family, The State and Social Policy, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. (1987), The Social Basis of Community Care, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. and Abrams, P. (1986), Neighbours: The Work of Phillip Abrams, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fennell, G., Emerson, A.R., Sidell, M. and Hague, A. (1981), Day Centres for the Elderly in East Anglia, Centre for East Anglian Studies, Norwich.Google Scholar
Finch, Janet (1987), ‘Whose responsibility? Women and the future of family care’, in Allen, I., Wicks, M., Finch, J. and Leat, D. (eds), Informal Care Tomorrow Policy Studies Institute, London.Google Scholar
Froland, C. (1981). ‘Formal and informal care: discontinuities in a continuum’. Social Services Review, 54.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Gilleard, C., Gilleard, E. and Whittick, J. E. (1984), ‘Impact of psychogeriatric day hospital care on the patient's family’, British Journal of Psychiatry 145, 487–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, E., Sinclair, I. and Gorbach, P. (1983). The Supporters of Confused Elderly Persons at Home. NISW, London.Google Scholar
Moroney, R. (1976), The Family and the State: Considerations for Social Policy, Longman, London.Google Scholar
Rimmer, L. and Wicks, M. (1983). ‘The challenge of change: demographic trends, the family and social policy’, in Glennerster, H. (ed.) The Future of the Welfare State; Remaking Social Policy, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Twigg, J. (1988), ‘Evaluation and the problems of its use in relation to support for informal carers’, Discussion Paper. Social Policy Research Unit. York.Google Scholar
Wicks, M. (1982), ‘Community care and elderly people’, in Walker, A. (ed.) Community Care: The Family, the State and Social Policy, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wright, Fay D. (1986), Left to Care Alone, Gower, Aldershot.Google Scholar