Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:53:16.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

λμ-calculus and Böhm's theorem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

René David  and
Walter Py
René David
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Maths, Campus Scientifique, F 73376 le Bourget du Lac, France, E-mail: david@univ-savoie.fr
Walter Py
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Maths, Campus Scientifique, F 73376 le Bourget du Lac, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The λμ-calculus is an extension of the λ-calculus that has been introduced by M Parigot to give an algorithmic content to classical proofs. We show that Böhm's theorem fails in this calculus.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 407 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Abramsky, S. and Ong, L., Full abstraction in the lazy lambda calculas, Information and Computation, vol. 105 (1993), no. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Aczel, P., A general church-rosser theorem, Technical report, University of Manchester, 1978.Google Scholar
[3]Klop, J. W., van Oostrom, V., and van Raamsdonk, F., Combinatory reduction systems, introduction and suevey, Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 121 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Krivine, J. L., Lambda-calcul, types et modèles, Masson, Paris, 1990.Google Scholar
[5]Nour, K., Non deterministic classical logic: The λ∂-calculas, Private communication.Google Scholar
[6]Parigot, M., λμ-calculas: an algorithmic interpretation of classical natural deduction, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, no. 624, Springer-Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar
[7]Parigot, M., Classical proofs as programs, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, no. 713, Springer Verlag, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Parigot, M., Proofs of strong normalization for second order classical natural deduction, this Journal, vol. 62, (1997), no. 4.Google Scholar
[9]Prawitz, D., Natural deduction, a proof-theoritical study, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.Google Scholar
[10]Py, W., Confluence en λμcalcul, Ph.D. thesis, 1998.Google Scholar