Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:13:03.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aging as a Normative Phenomenon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2017

SAMUEL SCHEFFLER
SAMUEL SCHEFFLER*
Affiliation:
NEW YORK UNIVERSITYsamuel.scheffler@nyu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Many philosophers have discussed the normative significance of personal relationships. The implicit focus of most of these discussions is on the normative significance of active, ongoing relationships. But, of course, all relationships end eventually. This article focuses on relationships that end through the death of one of the participants. A relationship that has ended in this way can still be a source of reasons for the surviving participant. This represents a different dimension of the normative significance of personal relationships, and it is a dimension that tends to become increasingly salient as one ages. Indeed, aging is in part a normative phenomenon, because it involves significant changes in the kinds of reasons people have. This article explores some of those changes and the distinctive questions to which they give rise.

Keywords

normative ethicsmoral psychologypractical reasoning
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , Winter 2016 , pp. 505 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davis, Lydia. (2009) The Collected Stories of Lydia Davis. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Niko. (2003) ‘Love as Valuing a Relationship’. Philosophical Review, 112, 135–89.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. (1997) ‘Relationships and Responsibilities’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26, 189–209.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. (2010a) ‘Valuing’. In Scheffler, S. (ed.), Equality and Tradition (New York: Oxford University Press), 15–40.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. (2010b) ‘Morality and Reasonable Partiality’. In Scheffler, S. (ed.), Equality and Tradition (New York: Oxford University Press), 41–75.Google Scholar