Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:41:36.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Experience Machine Objection to Desire Satisfactionism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2017

DAN LOWE  and
JOSEPH STENBERG
DAN LOWE
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDERdaniel.p.lowe@gmail.com
JOSEPH STENBERG
Affiliation:
HUMBOLDT-UNIVERSITÄT ZU BERLINjoseph.stenberg@hu-berlin.de12
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

It is widely held that the experience machine is the basis of a serious objection to hedonistic theories of welfare. It is also widely held that desire satisfactionist theories of welfare can readily avoid problems stemming from the experience machine. But in this paper, we argue that if the experience machine poses a serious problem for hedonism, it also poses a serious problem for desire satisfactionism. We raise two objections to desire satisfactionism, each of which relies on the experience machine. The first is very much like the well-known experience machine objection to hedonism. The second asks whether someone who accepts desire satisfactionism should want to form a desire to plug into the experience machine.

Keywords

welfarehedonismdesire satisfactionismthe experience machine
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Summer 2017 , pp. 247 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brink, David Owen. (1989) Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger. (2006) “Hedonism Reconsidered.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73, no. 3: 619–45.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger. (2014) ‘Well-Being’. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/well-being/.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. (1997) ‘Self-Interest and Self-Concern’. Social Philosophy and Policy, 14, 158–78.Google Scholar
Feldman, Fred. (2004) Pleasure and the Good Life: Concerning the Nature, Varieties, and Plausibility of Hedonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Fred. (2011) ‘What We Learn from the Experience Machine’. In Bader, Ralf M. and Meadowcroft, John (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 59–86.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. (1980) Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frederick, Shane, and Loewenstein, George. (1999) ‘Hedonic Adaptation’. In Kahneman, Daniel, Diener, Ed, and Schwarz, Norbert (eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (New York: Russell Sage Foundation), 302–29.Google Scholar
Griffin, James. (1986) Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John C. (1982) ‘Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior’. In Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 39–62.Google Scholar
Heathwood, Chris. (2005) ‘The Problem of Defective Desires’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 83, 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathwood, Chris. (2010) ‘Welfare’. In Skorupski, J. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics (London: Routledge), 645–55.Google Scholar
Heathwood, Chris. (2014) ‘Subjective Theories of Well-Being’. In Eggleston, Ben and Miller, Dale E. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Utilitarianism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 199–219.Google Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. (1994) ‘Me and My Life’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 94, 309–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. (1998) Normative Ethics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lukas, Mark. (2013) ‘Desire Theories of the Good’. In LaFollette, Hugh (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. (1989) The Examined Life: Philosophical Meditations. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Overvold, Mark Carl. (1980) ‘Self-Interest and the Concept of Self-Sacrifice’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 10, 105–18.Google Scholar
Overvold, Mark Carl. (1982) ‘Self-Interest and Getting What You Want’. In Miller, Harlan B. and Williams, William H. (eds.), The Limits of Utilitarianism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), 186–94.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sumner, L. W. (1996) Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Timmons, Mark. (2013) Moral Theory: An Introduction. 2d ed. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Weijers, Dan, and Schouten, Vanessa. (2013) ‘An Assessment of Recent Responses to the Experience Machine Objection to Hedonism’. Journal of Value Inquiry, 47, 461–82.Google Scholar