Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T05:11:26.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fear of COVID-19 changes economic preferences: evidence from a repeated cross-sectional MTurk survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Abdelaziz Alsharawy
Affiliation:
School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
Sheryl Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Alec Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Ross Spoon
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
*

Abstract

The personal experience of events such as financial crises and natural disasters can alter economic preferences. We administered a repeated cross-sectional preference survey during the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak, collecting three bi-weekly samples from participants recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk. The survey elicits economic preferences, self-reported fear of the pandemic, and beliefs about economic and health consequences. Preferences varied over time and across regions, and self-reported fear of the pandemic explains this variation. These findings suggest caution about the generalizability of some types of experimental work during times of heightened fear.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahorsu, D. K., Lin, C.-Y., Imani, V., Saffari, M., Griffiths, M. D., Pakpour, A. H. (2020). The fear of covid-19 scale: development and initial validation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8Google Scholar
Allcott, H., Boxell, L., Conway, J., Gentzkow, M., Thaler, M., Yang, D. (2020). Polarization and public health: partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104254. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsharawy, A., Spoon, R., Smith, A., Ball, S. (2021). Gender differences in fear and risk perception during the covid-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 3104. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689467CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, M. L. (2008). Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: a reevaluation of the abecedarian, perry preschool, and early training projects. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 14811495. 10.1198/016214508000000841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arslan, R. C., Brümmer, M., Dohmen, T., Drewelies, J., Hertwig, R., Wagner, G. G. (2020). How people know their risk preference. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 114. 10.1038/s41598-020-72077-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrios, J. M., Hochberg, Y. (2020). Risk perception through the lens of politics in the time of the covid-19 pandemic (No. 0898–2937). National Bureau of Economic Research, 10.3386/w27008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beine, M. A., Charness, G., Dupuy, A., & Joxhe, M. (2020). Shaking things up: on the stability of risk and time preferences. CESifo Working Paper No. 8187, Available at SSRN 3570289.Google Scholar
Bu, D., Hanspal, T., Liao, Y., Liu, Y. (2020). Risk taking during a global crisis: evidence from Wuhan. Covid Economics, 5, 106146.Google Scholar
Callen, M. (2015). Catastrophes and time preference: evidence from the indian ocean earthquake. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118, 199214. 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callen, M., Isaqzadeh, M., Long, J. D., Sprenger, C. (2014). Violence and risk preference: experimental evidence from Afghanistan. American Economic Review, 104(1), 123148. 10.1257/aer.104.1.123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassar, A., Healy, A., Von Kessler, C. (2017). Trust, risk, and time preferences after a natural disaster: experimental evidence from Thailand. World Development, 94, 90105. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 817869. 10.1162/003355302760193904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelho, C. M., Suttiwan, P., Arato, N., Zsido, A. N. (2020). On the nature of fear and anxiety triggered by COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3109. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeSteno, D., Li, Y., Dickens, L., Lerner, J. S. (2014). Gratitude: a tool for reducing economic impatience. Psychological Science, 25(6), 12621267. 10.1177/0956797614529979CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522550. 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, E., Du, H., Gardner, L. (2020). An interactive web-based dashboard to track covid-19 in real time. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(5), 533534. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckel, C. C., El-Gamal, M. A., Wilson, R. K. (2009). Risk loving after the storm: a Bayesian-network study of hurricane katrina evacuees. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69(2), 110124. 10.1016/j.jebo.2007.08.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J. (2002). Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(4), 281295. 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00097-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esaiasson, P., Sohlberg, J., Ghersetti, M., Johansson, B. (2021). How the coronavirus crisis affects citizen trust in institutions and in unknown others: evidence from ‘the Swedish experiment’. European Journal of Political Research, 60(3), 748760. 10.1111/1475-6765.12419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Huffman, D., Sunde, U. (2018). Global evidence on economic preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(4), 16451692. 10.1093/qje/qjy013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T. J., Huffman, D., Sunde, U. (2016). The preference survey module: a validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. SSRN, 10.2139/ssrn.2725874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, D. A., Chong, A., Bejarano, H. D. (2014). Trust and reciprocity in the aftermath of natural disasters. The Journal of Development Studies, 50(11), 14821493. 10.1080/00220388.2014.936395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, R., Pedroni, A., Mata, R., Rieskamp, J., Hertwig, R. (2017). Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits. Science Advances, 3(10),e1701381. 10.1126/sciadv.1701381CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gadarian, S. K., Goodman, S. W., Pepinsky, T. B. (2021). Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the covid-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 10.1371/journal.pone.0249596CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gambetta, D., Morisi, D. (2020). L’Enfer c’est les Autres? The effects of covid-19 virus on interpersonal trust. SocArXiv, 10.31235/osf.io/rm4ckCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, L. (2018). Time varying risk aversion. Journal of Financial Economics, 128(3), 403421. 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanaoka, C., Shigeoka, H., Watanabe, Y. (2018). Do risk preferences change? Evidence from the great east Japan earthquake. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(2), 298330. 10.1257/app.20170048Google Scholar
Huang, L., Zhou, Y., Han, Y., Hammitt, J. K., Bi, J., Liu, Y. (2013). Effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the risk perception of residents near a nuclear power plant in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(49), 1974219747. 10.1073/pnas.1313825110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibuka, Y., Chapman, G. B., Meyers, L. A., Li, M., Galvani, A. P. (2010). The dynamics of risk perceptions and precautionary behavior in response to 2009 (H1N1) pandemic influenza. BMC Infectious Diseases, 10(1), 111. 10.1186/1471-2334-10-296CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ifcher, J., Zarghamee, H. (2011). Happiness and time preference: the effect of positive affect in a random-assignment experiment. American Economic Review, 101(7), 31093129. 10.1257/aer.101.7.3109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R., Basáñez, M., Díez-Medrano, J., Halman, L., Luijkx, R. (2004). Human beliefs and values: a cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999–2002 values surveys, Mexico: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Jang, W. M., Kim, U.-N., Jang, D. H., Jung, H., Cho, S., Eun, S. J., Lee, J. Y. (2020). Influence of trust on two different risk perceptions as an affective and cognitive dimension during middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in South Korea: serial cross-sectional surveys. British Medical Journal Open, 10(3),e033026.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, S. A., Mathis, A. A., Jobe, M. C., Pappalardo, E. A. (2020). Clinically significant fear and anxiety of COVID-19: a psychometric examination of the coronavirus anxiety scale. Psychiatry Research, 290, 113112. 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Weber, E. U. (2012). The financial costs of sadness. Psychological Science, 24(1), 7279. 10.1177/0956797612450302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267286. 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malmendier, U., Nagel, S. (2011). Depression babies: do macroeconomic experiences affect risk taking? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), 373416. 10.1093/qje/qjq004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mata, R., Frey, R., Richter, D., Schupp, J., Hertwig, R. (2018). Risk preference: a view from psychology. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2), 155172. 10.1257/jep.32.2.155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Painter, M., Qiu, T. (2020). Political beliefs affect compliance with covid-19 social distancing orders. SSRN, 10.2139/ssrn.3569098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Trust in Government: 1958–2021 (Pew Research Center—U.S. Politics & Policy). (2021). Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/05/17/public-trust-in-government-1958-2021/. Accessed 4 Oct 2021.Google Scholar
Shachat, J., Walker, M. J., Wei, L. (2021). How the onset of the covid-19 pandemic impacted pro-social behavior and individual preferences: experimental evidence from China. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 190, 480494. 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.08.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, A. (2020). ASDOC: stata module to create high-quality tables in MS word from stata output. Statistical software components, Boston: Boston College Department of Economics.Google Scholar
Stein, J. Y., Levin, Y., Gelkopf, M., Tangir, G., Solomon, Z. (2018). Traumatization or habituation? A four-wave investigation of exposure to continuous traumatic stress in Israel. International Journal of Stress Management, 25(S1),137. 10.1037/str0000084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. J., Becker, G. S. (1977). De Gustibus Non est Disputandum. The American Economic Review, 67(2), 7690.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. R., Agho, K. E., Stevens, G. J., Raphael, B. (2008). Factors influencing psychological distress during a disease epidemic: data from Australia’s first outbreak of equine influenza. BMC Public Health, 8(1), 113. 10.1186/1471-2458-8-347CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Level [CE16OV]. (n.d.). retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. From https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CE16OV. Accessed 20 Oct 2021.Google Scholar
Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., Schupp, J. (2007). The German socio-economic panel study (SOEP)-evolution, scope and enhancements. SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.1028709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitt, S., Wilson, R. K. (2007). Public goods in the field: Katrina evacuees in houston. Southern Economic Journal, 74(2), 377387. 10.2307/20111973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Alsharawy et al. supplementary material

Alsharawy et al. supplementary material
Download Alsharawy et al. supplementary material(File)
File 640.7 KB