Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T19:08:53.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The price of luck: paying for the hot hand of others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Silvia Bou
Affiliation:
Department of Business, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Jordi Brandts*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Análisis Económico (CSIC) and Barcelona GSE, Barcelona, Spain
Magda Cayón
Affiliation:
Department of Business, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Pablo Guillén
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

We report on the results of an experiment with a statistical choice task involving the toss of a fair coin. In our experiment, participants had to decide whether they were willing to pay a price to switch from betting on the future performance of one player to betting on that of another player. The switch was from a player who had been previously less successful in betting on five coin flips to another one who had been more successful in the same task. We conducted a treatment with the Becker–DeGroot–Marschak mechanism and one in which participants were faced with a fixed price. In both cases, participants exhibit a strong bias towards placing their bets on players with a good guessing history in the coin toss task. Participants’ behaviour is compatible with prescriptive luck beliefs, that is, the idea that luck is a somehow deterministic and personal attribute.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Economic Science Association 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40881-016-0023-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

Asparouhova, E., Hertzel, M., Lemmon, M. (2009). Inference from streaks in random outcomes: Experimental evidence on beliefs in regime shifting and the law of small numbers. Management Science, 55(11), 17661782. 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God?, Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Bartling, B., Engl, F., Weber, R. A. (2015). Game form misconceptions are not necessary for a willingness-to-pay vs. willingness-to-accept gap. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1), 7285. 10.1007/s40881-015-0008-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cason, T. N., Plott, C. R. (2014). Misconceptions and game form recognition: Challenges to theories of revealed preference and framing. Journal of Political Economy, 122(6), 12351270. 10.1086/677254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darke, P. R., Freedman, J. L. (1997). The belief in good luck scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 486511. 10.1006/jrpe.1997.2197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilovich, T., Tversky, A., Vallone, R. (1985). The Hot-hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 295314. 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90010-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, K., Wegner, D. M. (2010). Blaming god for our pain: Human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 716. 10.1177/1088868309350299CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, G. W. (1992). Theory and misbehavior of first-price auctions: Reply. The American Economic Review, 82(5), 14261443.Google Scholar
Horowitz, J. K. (2006). The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism is not necessarily incentive compatible, even for non-random goods. Economics Letters, 93(1), 611. 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.03.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow, Melbourne: Penguin books.Google Scholar
Miller, J. B., & Sanjurjo, A. (2014). A cold shower for the hot hand fallacy. SSRN (working paper).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. B., & Sanjurjo, A. (2015). Is it a fallacy to believe in the hot hand in the NBA three-point contest? Bocconi University (working paper).Google Scholar
Noussair, C., Robin, S., Ruffieux, B. (2004). Revealing consumers’ willingness-to-pay: A comparison of the BDM mechanism and the Vickrey auction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(6), 725741. 10.1016/j.joep.2003.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offerman, T., Schotter, A. (2009). Imitation and luck: An experimental study on social sampling. Games and Economic Behavior, 65, 461502. 10.1016/j.geb.2008.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offerman, T., Sonnemans, J. (2004). What’s causing overreaction? An experimental investigation of recency and the hot-hand effect. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 533554. 10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.t01-1-00376.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powdthavee, N., Riyanto, Y. E. (2015). Would you pay for transparently useless advice? A test of boundaries of beliefs in the folly of predictions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(2), 257272. 10.1162/REST_a_00453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabin, M. (2002). Inference by believers in the law of small numbers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 775816. 10.1162/003355302760193896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabin, M., Vayanos, D. (2010). The gambler’s and hot-hand fallacies: Theory and applications. The Review of Economic Studies, 77(2), 730778. 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00582.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suetens, S., Galbo-Jørgensen, C. B., & Tyran, J. R. (forthcoming). Predicting lotto numbers: A natural experiment on the gambler’s fallacy and the hot-hand fallacy. Journal of the European Economic Association.Google Scholar
Thompson, E., Prendergast, G. (2013). Belief in luck and luckiness: Conceptual clarification and measure validation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(4), 501506. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105110. 10.1037/h0031322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, J., Sun, G., Siu, R. (2014). The lure of illusory luck: How much are people willing to pay for random shocks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 106, 269280. 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bou et al. supplementary material

Bou et al. supplementary material
Download Bou et al. supplementary material(File)
File 46.3 KB