Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:55:07.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A shared identity promotes herding in an information cascade game

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Sebastian Berger*
Affiliation:
Department of Organization and Human Resource Management, University of Bern, Engehaldenstrasse 4, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
Christoph Feldhaus*
Affiliation:
Department of Business and Economics, University of Münster, Am Stadtgraben 9, 48143 Münster, Germany
Axel Ockenfels*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Cologne, Germany

Abstract

Our research addresses the effect of shared vs. mixed group identities in an information cascade game. We vary whether subjects always choose after a decision maker who shares the same identity or after a decision maker with a different identity. We find that subjects’ inclination to follow their predecessor is stronger in groups uniquely consisting of ingroup members compared to mixed groups. We relate this result to recent social cognition research.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Economic Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-018-0050-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

Akerlof, G. A., Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715753. 10.1162/003355300554881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, L. R., Holt, C. A. (1997). Information cascades in the laboratory. American Economic Review, 87(5), 847862.Google Scholar
Athey, S., Avery, C., Zemsky, P. (2000). Mentoring and diversity. American Economic Review, 90(4), 765786. 10.1257/aer.90.4.765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797817. 10.2307/2118364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettinger, E. P., Long, B. T. (2005). Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. The American Economic Review, 95(2), 152157. 10.1257/000282805774670149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural changes as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 9921026. 10.1086/261849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, G., Feldhaus, C., Ockenfels, A. (2016). Social interaction promotes risk taking in a stag hunt game. German Economic Review, 17(3), 409423. 10.1111/geer.12095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrell, S. E., Page, M. E., West, J. E. (2010). Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 11011144. 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çelen, B., Kariv, S. (2004). Distinguishing informational cascades from herd behavior in the laboratory. American Economic Review, 94(3), 484497. 10.1257/0002828041464461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, R., Chen, Y. (2011). The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. American Economic Review, 101(6), 25622589. 10.1257/aer.101.6.2562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Li, S. X. (2009). Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review, 99(1), 431457. 10.1257/aer.99.1.431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominitz, J., Hung, A. (2009). Empirical models of discrete choice and belief updating in observational learning experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69, 94109. 10.1016/j.jebo.2007.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drehmann, M., Oechssler, J., Roider, A. (2005). Herding and contrarian behavior in financial markets—An internet experiment. American Economic Review, 95(5), 14031426. 10.1257/000282805775014317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahr, R., Irlenbusch, B. (2011). Who follows the crowd—Groups or individuals? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80(1), 200209. 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.03.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischbacher, U. (2007). Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171178. 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gino, F., Shang, J., Croson, R. (2009). The impact of information from similar or different advisors on judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 287302. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goeree, J. K., Palfrey, T. R., McKelvey, B. W. (2007). Self-correcting information cascades. Review of Economic Studies, 74(3), 733762. 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00438.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1), 114125. 10.1007/s40881-015-0004-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huck, S., Oechssler, J. (2000). Informational cascades in the laboratory: Do they occur for the right reasons? Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(6), 661671. 10.1016/S0167-4870(00)00025-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, A., Plott, C. R. (2001). Information cascades: Replication and an extension to majority rule and conformity-rewarding institutions. American Economic Review, 91(5), 15081520. 10.1257/aer.91.5.1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kübler, D., Weizsäcker, G. (2004). Limited depth of reasoning and failure of cascade formation in the laboratory. Review of Economic Studies, 71(2), 425441. 10.1111/0034-6527.00290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kübler, D., Weizsäcker, G. (2005). Are longer cascades more stable? Journal of the European Economic Association (Papers and Proceedings), 3(2–3), 330339. 10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Coq, C., Tremewan, J., Wagner, A. K. (2015). On the effects of group identity strategic environments. European Economic Review, 76, 239252. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, S. S., Apfelbaum, E. P., Bernard, M., Bartelt, V. L., Zajac, E. J., Stark, D. (2014). Ethnic diversity deflates price bubbles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(52), 1852418529. 10.1073/pnas.1407301111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLeish, K. N., & Oxoby, R. J. (2007). Identity, cooperation, and punishment. Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mussweiler, T., Ockenfels, A. (2013). Similarity increases altruistic punishment in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 1931819323. 10.1073/pnas.1215443110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mussweiler, T., Posten, A.-C. (2012). Relatively certain! Comparative thinking reduces uncertainty. Cognition, 122, 236240. 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nöth, M., Weber, M. (2003). Information aggregation with random ordering: Cascades and overconfidence. Economic Journal, 113(484), 166189. 10.1111/1468-0297.00091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ockenfels, A., Werner, P. (2014). Beliefs and ingroup favoritism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 108, 453462. 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and inter-group behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149177. 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 81, 3347.Google Scholar
Weizsäcker, G. (2010). Do we follow others when we should? A simple test of rational expectations. American Economic Review, 100(5), 23402360. 10.1257/aer.100.5.2340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegelmeyer, A., March, C., Krügel, S. (2013). Do we follow others when we should? A simple test of rational expectations: Comment. American Economic Review, 103(6), 26332642. 10.1257/aer.103.6.2633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Berger et al. supplementary material

Berger et al. supplementary material
Download Berger et al. supplementary material(File)
File 46.1 KB