1 Neurocognitive Correlates of Oculomotor Performance among U.S. Military Personnel with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract

Objective:

To examine neurocognitive correlates of oculomotor performance among U.S. military personnel with history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

Participants and Methods:

A series of studies (total n=356) were conducted to examine saccadic eye movements and manual button presses collected in response to attention stimuli, and to compare these findings to the results of standardized neuropsychological tests. Study 1 included n=27 with remote mTBI and n=54 controls who completed the Bethesda Eye and Attention Measure (BEAM), an eye tracking task that was designed to measure visual attention and executive function. In Study 2, n=51 with chronic mTBI and n=33 controls completed the Fusion n-Back task, an eye tracking task that was designed to assess the impact of working memory load on visual attention performance. Study 3 examined psychometric characteristics of BEAM among n=191 military personnel with remote mTBI. In all studies, participants completed eye tracking tasks, a structured TBI diagnostic interview, and a brief battery of standardized neuropsychological tests.

Results:

In Study 1, BEAM saccadic and manual metrics demonstrated strong reliability and high sensitivity to multiple cognitive cues designed to elicit spatial orienting, temporal alerting, executive interference, perceptual release (gap) and inhibition (n²p=.76, p<.001). However, corresponding saccadic and manual measurements were weakly related to each other, and only manual (not saccadic) measurements were related to estimated verbal intelligence or years of education. Standardized neuropsychological measures did not differ between groups, but mTBI participants were more likely to be impaired on saccadic metrics than controls.

In Study 2, Standardized cognitive measures and estimated premorbid intelligence were positively associated with all manual metrics from the Fusion n-Back test, but were not associated with mTBI history or with saccadic metrics. Fusion n-Back saccadic and manual metrics had strong reliability and complementary sensitivity to chronic mTBI, with combined predictive power of PPV=.78, NPV=.72, r²=.44 for classification of remote mild TBI vs. controls on the more cognitively-challenging 1-back task condition.

In Study 3, BEAM metrics including manual RT latency and consistency, saccadic RT consistency, and saccadic inhibition errors showed consistent correlations with standardized measures of visual attention, processing speed, task switching, working memory, and executive functions. Hierarchical regressions showed that BEAM saccadic and manual metrics were independently predictive of cognitive test performance, above and beyond effects of demographic factors and clinical characteristics.

Conclusions:

Results demonstrated some surprising findings related to neurocognitive influences on oculomotor performance. While both saccadic and manual performance were strongly and similarly influenced by attention cues, these two modalities were only weakly correlated to one another. Additionally, manual metrics were more strongly and consistently related to standardized cognitive test performance and premorbid intelligence than saccadic metrics. However, saccadic metrics demonstrated superior sensitivity to remote/chronic mTBI relative to manual metrics and standardized neuropsychological measures. Overall, these results suggest that saccadic eye tracking measures may provide unique value in assessment of mTBI and neurocognitive functions that is complementary with more common forms of assessment relying upon somatomotor response modalities.