Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:14:50.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electropalatography data from Central Arrernte: A comparison of the new Articulate palate with the standard Reading palate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2011

Marija Tabain
Marija Tabain*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia m.tabain@latrobe.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents electropalatography (EPG) data from two female speakers of Central Arrernte, a language with six places of articulation, including four coronal contrasts. Both speakers were recorded reading the same list of words using two different types of artificial palate: the standard Reading palate, and the new Articulate palate. Data are presented from seventeen lingual consonants of this language. It is suggested that since the Articulate palate provides more coverage of the velar and dental regions, it may be able to better capture the crucial laminal and apical distinctions that exist in Australian languages such as Central Arrernte. However, caution is advised in interpreting the results from the two different types of artificial palate, since for many consonants, palatograms as well as values for standard analysis measures differ greatly between the two palate types.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , December 2011 , pp. 343 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Articulate Instruments Ltd. 2007. Articulate assistant advanced user guide: Version 2.07. Edinburgh: Articulate Instruments Ltd.Google Scholar
Breen, Gavan & Dobson, Veronica. 2005. Central Arrernte. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35, 249–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, Gavan & Pensalfini, Rob. 1999. Arrernte: A language with no syllable onsets. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butcher, Andrew. 1995a. The sounds of Australian languages. Ms., Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
Butcher, Andrew. 1995b. The phonetics of neutralization: The case of Australian coronals. In Lewis, Jack Windsor (ed.), Studies in English and general phonetics: Essays in honour of J. D. O'Connor, 10–38. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butcher, Andrew. 2006. Australian Aboriginal languages: Consonant-salient phonologies and the ‘place-of-articulation imperative’. In Harrington, Jonathan & Tabain, Marija (eds.), Speech production: Models, phonetic processes and techniques, 187–210. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Butcher, Andrew & Tabain, Marija. 2004. On the back of the tongue: Dorsal sounds in Australian languages. Phonetica 61, 22–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrd, Dani, Flemming, Edward, Muller, Carl & Tan, Cheng. 1995. Using regions and indices in EPG data reduction. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38, 821–827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassidy, Steve & Harrington, Jonathan. 2001. Multi-level annotation in the EMU speech database management system. Speech Communication 33, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dart, Sarah. 1991. Articulatory and acoustic properties of apical and laminal articulations (UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 79). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1995. Current issues in the phonology of Australian languages. In Goldsmith, John (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 723–761. Cambridge, MA: Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Samuel. 1992. Articulation: A physiological approach. San Diego, CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cecile, Meynadier, Yohann & Demolin, Didier. 2000. 62 vs. 96 electrodes: A comparative analysis of Reading and Kay Elemetrics EPG pseudo-palates. 5th International Seminar on Speech Production, 309–312. Kloster Seon.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Fiona, Hardcastle, William & Nicolaidis, Katerina. 1993. Temporal and spatial aspects of lingual coarticuation in /kl/ sequences: A cross-linguistic investigation. Language and Speech 36, 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, Fiona & Nicolaidis, Katerina. 1999. Palatography. In Hardcastle, William & Hewlett, Nigel (eds.), Coarticulation: Data, theory and techniques, 229–245. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardcastle, William. 1972. The use of electropalatography in phonetic research. Phonetica 25, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardcastle, William, Gibbon, Fiona & Jones, W.. 1991. Visual display of tongue–palate contact: Electropalatography in the assessment and remediation of speech disorders. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 26, 41–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardcastle, William, Gibbon, Fiona & Nicolaidis, Katerina. 1991. EPG data reduction methods and their implications for studies of lingual coarticulation. Journal of Phonetics 19, 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan. 2010. Phonetic analysis of speech corpora. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Henderson, John. 1998. Topics in Eastern and Central Arrernte grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Henderson, John & Dobson, Veronica. 1994. Eastern and Central Arrernte to English dictionary. Alice Springs: IAD Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford & Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2003. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org (16 September 2009).Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Pallarès, Maria. 2001. Coarticulation, assimilation and blending in Catalan consonant clusters. Journal of Phonetics 29, 273–301.Google Scholar
Rickard, Kristine. 2006. A preliminary study of the rhythmic characteristics of Arrernte. 11th Australian International Conference on Speech Science & Technology, 346–348. Auckland: Causal Productions.Google Scholar
Shibata, S., Ino, A., Yamashita, S., Hiki, S., Kiritani, S. & Sawashima, M.. 1978. A new portable type unit for electropalatography. Annual Bulletin of Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics 12, 5–10.Google Scholar
Tabain, Marija. 2009. An EPG study of the alveolar vs. retroflex apical contrast in Central Arrernte. Journal of Phonetics 37, 486–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabain, Marija & Breen, Gavan. 2011. Central vowels in Central Arrernte: A spectrographic study of a small vowel system. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabain, Marija, Fletcher, Janet & Butcher, Andy. 2011. An EPG study of palatal consonants in two Australian languages. Language and Speech 54 (2), 265–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wrench, Alan. 2007. Advances in EPG palate design. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 9, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar