Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:00:17.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On pre-accentual lengthening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Richard Dasher  and
Dwight Bolinger
Richard Dasher
Affiliation:
(Stanford University; Harvard University and Stanford University)
Dwight Bolinger
Affiliation:
(Stanford University; Harvard University and Stanford University)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the numerous factors known or suspected to affect the length of a syllable in English is the nature of the immediately following syllable. It is widely recognized (P. Fijn van Draat, 1910, p. 14; Jones, 1956, §§ 886–7; Bolinger, 1965, pp. 168–9; Lehiste, 1972, p. 2021) that in a succession of monosyllabic words a word containing a full vowel will be longer when followed by another such word than when followed by a word containing a reduced vowel.1 Van Draat's example is Money makes the mare to go versus Money makes the mare go: in the latter, ‘We pronounce mare in two syllables.’ In the former one can say that the reduced to ‘borrows time’ from the full mare.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , December 1982 , pp. 58 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolinger, Dwight. (1963). Length, vowel, juncture. Linguistics 1.5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. (1965). Forms of English: accent, morpheme, order. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. (1972). Degree words. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. (1976). Length, vowel, juncture (revised). Bilingual Review 3: 1.43–61.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. (1981). Two kinds of vowels, two kinds of rhythm. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight, Lea, Wayne A., and Van Lancker, Diana. In progress. Untitled.Google Scholar
Fijn Van Draat, P. (1910). Rhythm in English prose. Anglistische Forschungen (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. (1956). An outline of English phonetics, 8th edition. New York: Dutton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. (1972). The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51.2018–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark. (1979). The intonational system of English. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Nakatani, Lloyd H., and Schaffer, Judith A. (1978). ‘Hearing words’ without words: prosodic cues for word perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63.234–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umeda, Noriko. and Harris, M. S. (1978). Prosodic structure of English: its acoustic analysis and perception. Study of sounds 18.245–57 (Phonetic Society of Japan).Google Scholar