Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:58:57.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Influence on Locomotor Activity in Nephrops Norvegicus (Crustacea: Decapoda)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

T. H. Moller  and
E. Naylor
T. H. Moller
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Port Erin, Isle of Man
E. Naylor
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Port Erin, Isle of Man
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Diel variations in the emergence of the burrowing prawn Nephrops norvegicus (L.) have been investigated by direct field observations (Chapman & Rice, 1971; Chapman, Johnstone & Rice, 1975; Chapman & Howard, 1979; Atkinson & Naylor, 1976), and indirectly by sequential trawling during 24 h periods (Höglund & Dybern, 1965; Simpson, 1965; Hillis, 1971; Farmer, 1974; Atkinson & Naylor, 1976; Oakley, 1979). Peak emergence appears to be related to temporal and depth-dependent variations in daylight penetration, since Nephrops are apparently nocturnal in shallow waters, crepuscular as the depth increases, and diurnal at the greatest depths of their occurrence. This lends support to the suggestion that emergence occurs at an optimum light intensity (Hillis, 1971; Chapman, Priestley & Robertson, 1972; Chapman, et al., 1975; Chapman & Howard, 1979). However, additional factors influencing emergence of Nephrops from their burrows have also to be taken in account, since laboratory studies of locomotor activity in Nephrops have consistently revealed nocturnal activity patterns in light-dark (LD) regimes, with light inhibiting locomotor activity even at extremely low irradiance levels (Arechiga & Atkinson, 1975; Atkinson & Naylor, 1973, 1976; Naylor & Atkinson, 1976). Moreover, Hammond & Naylor (1977 a) have presented qualitative evidence that the nocturnal locomotor activity peak appears to be synchronized by falling light intensity at dusk. The differences between these experimental results and emergence patterns deduced from trawl catches and underwater observations of Nephrops have not been fully resolved by studies of the role of light intensity and of gradual light transitions (Arechiga & Atkinson, 1975; Hammond & Naylor, 1977 a, b). Thus the behavioural responses of Nephrops both in the field and in the laboratory need to be assessed in relation to more accurately quantified light changes. Also, despite earlier evaluation of the problem (Atkinson & Naylor, 1976; Hammond & Naylor, 1977a) it is necessary to reconsider the possibility that the patterns of locomotor activity recorded in the laboratory are influenced by experimental conditions, as has been demonstrated for minnows (Jones, 1956), and flatfish (Verheijen & de Groot, 1967).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 103 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arechiga, H. & Atkinson, R. J. A., 1975. The eye and some effects of light on locomotor activity in Nephrops norvegicus. Marine Biology, 32, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R. J. A. & Naylor, E., 1973. Activity rhythms in some burrowing decapods. Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 24, 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R. J. A. & Naylor, E., 1976. An endogenous activity rhythm and the rhythmicity of catches of Nephrops norvegicus. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 25, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S., 1975. The role of light in the vertical migration offish - a review. In Light as an Ecological Factor, vol. II (ed. Evans, G. C., Bainbridge, R. and Rackham, O.), pp. 189–210. Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Chapman, C. J. & Howard, F. G., 1979. Field observations on the emergence rhythm of the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus, using different methods. Marine Biology, 51, 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. J., Johnstone, A. D. F. & Rice, A. L., 1975. The behaviour and ecology of the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus (L.). In Proceedings of the 9th European Symposium on Marine Biology, Oban, Scotland, 1974 (ed. Barnes, H.), pp. 59–74. Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, C. J., Priestley, R. & Robertson, H., 1972. Observations on the diurnal activity of the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus (L.). International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (C.M. Papers and Reports), K: 20, 18 pp. [Mimeo.]Google Scholar
Chapman, C. J. & Rice, A. L., 1971. Some direct observations on the ecology and behaviour of the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus. Marine Biology, 10, 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, A. S. D., 1974. Field assessments of diurnal activity in Irish Sea populations of the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus (L.) (Decapoda: Nephropidae). Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 2, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fielder, D. R., 1965. The spiny lobster, Jasus lalandei (H. Milne-Edwards), in south Australia. III. Food, feeding and locomotor activity. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 16, 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, R. D. & Naylor, E., 1977 a. Effects of dusk and dawn on locomotor activity rhythms in the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus. Marine Biology, 39, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, R. D. & Naylor, E., 1977 b. Laboratory study of the emergence pattern of Nephrops from burrows in habitat mud. Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 4, 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillis, J. P., 1971. Effects of light on Nephrops catches. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM. Papers and Reports), K: 3, 7 pp. [Mimeo.]Google Scholar
Höglund, H. & Dybern, B. I., 1965. Diurnal and seasonal variations in the catch composition of Nephrops norvegicus (L.) at the Swedish west coast. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM. Papers and Reports), K: 146, 9 pp. [Mimeo.]Google Scholar
Hughes, D. A., 1968. Factors controlling emergence of pink shrimp, Penaeus duorarum, from the substrate. Biological Bulletin, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 134, 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, F. R. Harden, 1956. The behaviour of minnows in relation to light intensity. Journal of Experimental Biology, 33, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerlov, N. G., 1976. Marine Optics. 230 pp. Elsevier Oceanography Series, no. 14.Google Scholar
Loew, E. R., 1976. Light and photoreceptor degeneration in the Norway lobster, Nephrops norvegicus (L.). Proceedings of the Royal Society (B), 193, 31–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Naylor, E. & Atkinson, R. J. A., 1976. Rhythmic behaviour of Nephrops and some other marine crustaceans. In Perspectives in Experimental Biology, vol. 1 (ed. Davies, P. S.), pp. 135–141. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. G., 1979. Diurnal and seasonal changes in the timing of peak catches of Nephrops norvegicus reflecting changes in behaviour. In Cyclic Behaviour in Marine Plants and Animals (ed. Naylor, E. and Hartnoll, R. G.), pp. 367–374. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. C., 1965. Variations in the catches of Nephrops norvegicus at different times of day and night. Rapports et procès-verbaux des réunions. Conseil permanent international pour l'exploration de la mer 156, 186–189.Google Scholar
Verheijen, F. J. & De Groot, S. J., 1967. Diurnal activity pattern of plaice and flounder (Pleuronectidae) in aquaria. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 3, 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar