Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:27:13.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Swimming behaviour of the larvae of Pecten maximus (L.) (Bivalvia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

S. M. Cragg
S. M. Cragg
Affiliation:
N.E.R.C. Unit of Marine Invertebrate Biology, Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Laboratory observations indicate that larvae of Pecten maximus (L.) pass through three phases of swimming behaviour before metamorphosis. Trochophores and early veligers generally swim upwards and, in shallow containers, tend to accumulate at the surface. Their swimming cilia beat without interruption so swimming is continuous. After 3 days of development, pauses in ciliary beating occur intermittently and the veliger becomes capable of withdrawing into its shell. It alternately swims up a vertically orientated spiral and sinks. This type of swimming behaviour is also displayed by the pediveliger, but this larva also periodically swims close to, or crawls on, the substratum. The tendency to accumulate at the surface becomes less pronounced as larvae grow older. By the pediveliger stage it is replaced by an increasing tendency to accumulate close to the substratum.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , August 1980 , pp. 551 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. A. & Scheltema, R. S., 1972. The functional morphology and geographical distribution of Planktomya hensoni, a supposed neotenous pelagic bivalve. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, L. A., 1961. The development of Pandora inequivalvis (Linné). Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology, 9, 252–268.Google ScholarPubMed
Bayne, B. L., 1963. Response of Mylilus edulis larvae to increases in hydrostatic pressure. Nature, London, 198, 406–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, B. L., 1964. The response of the larvae of Mytilus edulis L. to light and to gravity. Oikos, 15, 162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, J. R. & Sleigh, M. A., 1974. Mechanics of ciliary locomotion. Biological Reviews, 49, 85–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costello, D. P., Davidson, M. E., Eggers, A., Fox, M. H. & Henley, C., 1957. Methods for Obtaining and Handling Marine Eggs and Embryos. 247 pp. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole: Lancaster Press.Google Scholar
Cragg, S. M. & Gruffydd, Ll. D., 1975. The swimming behaviour and the pressure responses of the veliconcha larvae of Ostrea edulis (L.). In Proceedings of the Ninth European Marine Biology Symposium, Oban, Scotland, 1974 (ed. H., Barnes), pp. 43–57. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Cragg, S. M. & Nott, J. A., 1977. The ultrastructure of the statocysts in the pediveliger larvae of Pecten maximus (L.) (Bivalvia). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 27, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D. J., 1976. The role of the pelagic larva. In Perspectives in Experimental Biology. Vol. 1. Zoology (ed. P., Spencer Davies). Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Gruffydd, Ll. D., 1976. The development of the larva of Chlamys islandica in the plankton and its salinity tolerance in the laboratory (Lamellibranchia, Pectinidae). Astarie, 8, 60—66.Google Scholar
Gruffydd, Ll. D. & Beaumont, A. R., 1972. A method for rearing Pecten maximus larvae in the laboratory. Marine Biology, 15, 350–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskin, H. H., 1964. The distribution of oyster larvae. In Symposium on Experimental Marine Ecology (ed. N., Marshall, H. P., Jeffries, T. A., Napora and J. M., Sieburth), pp. 76–80. Occasional Publication no. 2, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island.Google Scholar
Hidu, H. & Haskin, H. H., 1978. Swimming speeds of oyster larvae Crassostrea virginica in different salinities and temperatures. Estuaries, 1, 252–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isham, L. B. & Tierney, J. Q., 1953. Some aspects of the larval development and metamorphosis of Teredo (Lyrodvs) pedicellata de Quatrefages. Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean, 2, 574–589.Google Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W., 1954. Notes on invertebrate larvae observed at Naples during May and June. Pubblicazioni della Stazione zoologica di Napoli, 25, 135–144.Google Scholar
Konstantinova, M. I., 1966. Characteristics of the motion of pelagic larvae of marine invertebrates. Doklady (Proceedings) Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. (Biological Sciences), 170, 753–756.Google Scholar
Lough, R. G. & Gonor, J. J., 1971. Early embryonic stages of Adula califomiensis (Pelecypoda: Mytilidae) and the effect of temperature and salinity on development rate. Marine Biology, 23, 11–17.Google Scholar
Mileikovsky, S. A., 1973. Speed of active movement of pelagic larvae of marine bottom invertebrates and their ability to regulate their vertical position. Marine Biology, 23, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughley, T. C., 1933. The life history of the Australian oyster Ostrea commercialis. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 58, 275–333.Google Scholar
Stafford, J., 1913. The Canadian Oyster. 159 pp. Ottawa: Mortimer.Google Scholar
Tebble, N., 1966. British Bivalve Seashells. 212 pp. London: The British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Turner, H. J. & George, C. J., 1955. Some aspects of the behaviour of the quahaug, Venus mercenaria, during the early stages. In Eighth Report of Investigations of the Shellfisheries of Massachusetts, pp. 5–14. Department of Natural Resources, Division of Marine Fisheries, Commonwealth of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Verwey, J., 1966. The role of some external factors in the vertical migration of marine animals. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 3, 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, L. & Hargis, W. J., 1971. Transport of bivalve larvae in a tidal estuary. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Marine Biology Symposium, Bangor, 1969 (ed. D. J., Crisp), pp. 29–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar