Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:15:09.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Systematics and biology of the Leopard-spotted Goby, Gobius ephippiatus [Teleostei: Gobiidae], with description of a new genus and notes on the identity of G. macrolepis Kolombatovic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P. J. Miller
Affiliation:
Zoology Dept., University of Bristol

Extract

The leopard-spotted goby, Gobius forsteri Corbin 1958, described from the western English Channel, is identified with the Madeiran Gobius ephippiatus Lowe 1839, the latter name becoming a senior subjective synonym for this species. From study of variation, with size of fish, in number of lateral-line sensory papillae in preopercular-mandibular row i, it is concluded that the Aegean Gobius thori De Buen 1928 may also be referred to G. ephippiatus. Examination of the syntypes of G. macrolepis Kolombatovic 1891, from the Adriatic, has shown that this name belongs to a close relative of G. ephippiatus and not to Mediterranean populations of the Atlantic Lesueurigobius friesii (Malm), as recent authors have supposed. A new genus, Thorogobius, is proposed for G. ephippiatus, the type species, and G. macrolepis, and a key provided to these two species, which differ in meristic features, development of pelvic anterior membrane and disc, head coloration, and relative number of sensory papillae. Further systematic data on material studied, synonymies, body proportions, papillae and meristic counts are also given.

As the complete list of known occurrences indicates, T. ephippiatus appears to be a warm temperate Mediterranean-Atlantic form which penetrates the eastern Atlantic boreal region around the British Isles at least as far north as the North Channel and eastwards to Lulworth Cove (western English Channel). As an inshore shelf species, T. ephippiatus occurs in or near crevices associated with vertical rock faces, from LWST to 30–40 m. Diet probably consists chiefly of crustaceans and polychaetes. Maximum total length recorded is 129 mm, and greatest age 9 years (determined from otoliths), with sexual maturity by the fifth year of life (age 4 +).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon., 1958. Torridge chat. Bideford & North Devon Gazette, 31 October.Google Scholar
Aurich, H. J., 1938. Die Gobiiden. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr., Vol. 38, pp. 125–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bini, G., 1968. Un Gobius raro. La scoperta di Amain. Mondo Sommerso, Milan, Ann. 10, N. 7, pp. 827–8.Google Scholar
Böhlke, J. E. & Robins, C. R., 1968. Western Atlantic seven-spined gobies, with descriptions of ten new species and a new genus, and comments on Pacific relatives. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., Vol. 120, No. 3, pp. 45174.Google Scholar
Brock, J., 1878. Beiträge zur Anatomie und Histologie der Geschlechtsorgane der Knochenfische. Morph. Jb., Bd. 4, pp. 505–72.Google Scholar
Bruce, J., Colman, J. S. & Jones, N. S., 1963. Marine Fauna of the Isle of Man and its Surrounding Seas. 307 pp. Liverpool: University Press (L.M.B.C. Mem. typ. Br. mar. Pl. Anim., No. 36).Google Scholar
Corbin, P. G., 1958. A new British fish (Gobius forsteri). Nature, Lond., Vol. 181, p. 1659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couch, J., 1863. A History of the Fishes of the British Islands. Vol. II. 265 pp. London: Groombridge & Sons.Google Scholar
De Buen, F., 1923. Gobius de la Peninsula Ibérica y Baleares. Grupos Lesueurii, Colonianus, Affinis, y Minutus. Mems. Inst. Esp. Oceanogr., Vol. 3, pp. 121266.Google Scholar
De Buen, F., 1928. Sobre dos especies del género Gobius (G. zebrus Risso y G. thori nov. nom.). Notas Resúm. Inst. esp. Oceanogr., Ser. 2, No. 22, 12 pp.Google Scholar
De Buen, F., 1930. Sur une collection de Gobiinae provenant du Maroc. Essai de synopsis des espèces de l'Europe. Bull. Soc. Sci. nat. Maroc, T. 10, pp. 120–47.Google Scholar
De Buen, F., 1931. Notas a la familia Gobiidae. Observaciones sobre algunos generos y sinopsis de las especies ibericas. Notas Resúm. Inst. esp. Oceanogr., Ser. 2, No. 54, 76 pp.Google Scholar
Dolgii, V. N., 1962. Data on the biology of the travyanik goby, Zosterisessor ophiocephalus (Pallas), in the conditions of the Tuzlov group of estuaries. Uch. Zap. Kishinev, gos. Univ., Vol. 62, No. 1 (Biol.), pp. 129–35. (National Lending Library for Science and Technology, Russian Translating Programme, RTS 3171).Google Scholar
Duncker, G., 1928. Gobiiformes. Tierwelt N.-u. Ostsee, Teil I, 12 g, pp. 121–48 (Lf. 12).Google Scholar
Egami, N., 1960. Comparative morphology of the sex characters in several species of Japanese gobies, with reference to the effects of sex steroids on the characters. J. Fac. Sci. Tokyo Univ., Sect. 4, Vol. 9, pp. 67100.Google Scholar
Eggert, B., 1931. Die Geschlechtsorgane der Gobiiformes und Blenniiformes. Z. wiss. Zool., Bd. 139, pp. 249517.Google Scholar
Ekman, S., 1953. Zoogeography of the Sea. 417 pp. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.Google Scholar
Fage, L., 1918. Shore-fishes. Rep. Dan. oceanogr. Exped. Mediterr. 1908–1910, Vol. 2, A3, 154 pp.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. W., 1936. The marine fishes of West Africa, based on the collection of the American Museum Congo Expedition, 1909–1915. Parts I and II. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist., Vol. 70, pp. 11493.Google Scholar
Halliday, R. G. & Miller, P. J., 1963. Records of Gobius paganellus from western Scotland. Glasg. Nat., Vol. 18, pp. 242–45.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C, 1959. The Open Sea. Part II. Fish and Fisheries. 322 pp. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Hartnoll, R. G. & Miller, P. J., 1962. New records of Gobius forsteri. Nature, Lond., Vol. 194, p. 1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holme, N. A., 1966. The bottom fauna of the English Channel. Part II. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 46, pp. 401–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, E. W. & Byrne, L. W., 1903. The British and Irish gobies. Scient. Invest. Fish. Brch. Ire., 1901, pp. 3766.Google Scholar
Kolombatovic, G., 1891. Glamoci (Gobii) Spljetskog Pomorskog Okruzja u Dalmaciji. 29 pp. Split.Google Scholar
Kostyuchenko, V. A., 1961. Age and rate of growth of the kruglyak goby (Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas)) in the Sea of Azov. Tr. Azov-Chernom. NauchnoIssled. Inst. Ryb. Khoz. Okeanogr., Vol. 19, pp. 4559 (National Lending Library for Science and Technology, Russian Translating Programme, RTS 3172).Google Scholar
Lowe, R. T., 1839. A supplement to a synopsis of the fishes of Madeira. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Part VII, pp. 7692.Google Scholar
Lowe, R. T., 1842. Supplement to ‘A Synopsis of the Fishes of Madeira.’ Trans, zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 3, Part 1, pp. 120.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1956. Report of the Council for 1955–56. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 35, pp. 647–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1957a. Plymouth Marine Fauna, 3rd Ed. 457 pp.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1957b. Report of the Council for 1956–57. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 699720.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1960. Report of the Council for 1959–60. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp. 703–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maul, G. E., 1949. Lista sistemática dos peixes assinalados nos mares da Madeira e indice alfabetico. Vertebrados do Madeira, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 137–81.Google Scholar
Miller, P. J., 1961a. Age, growth, and reproduction of the rock goby, Gobius paganellus L., in the Isle of Man. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 41, pp. 737–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. J., 1961b. The external appearance and systematic position of Gobius forsteri (Teleostei-Percomorphi). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 137, pp. 539–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. J., 1963a. Taxonomy and biology of the genus Lebetus (TeleosteiGobioidea). Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. ser. Zool., Vol. 10, pp. 205–56.Google Scholar
Miller, P. J., 1963b. Studies on the Biology and Taxonomy of British Gobiid Fishes. 213 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Miller, P. J., 1965. Relictogobius kryzhanovskii and the penetration of Mediterranean gobies into the Black Sea. Nature, Lond., Vol. 208, pp. 474–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. J., 1966. A new genus and species of gobiid fish from the eastern Mediterranean. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 13, Vol. 8, pp. 161–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintavalle, G. & Conti, A., 1960. Sogliole, tonnie, pesci spada. Natura, Milano, Ann. II, N. 72, pp. 349–76.Google Scholar
Riedl, R., 1966. Biologie des Meereshöhlen. 632 pp. Hamburg: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Rlsso, A., 1827. Histoire Naturelle des Principales Productions de I'Europe Méridionale et Particuliérement de Celles des Environs de Nice et des Alpes Maritimes. Vol. III. 480 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
Robins, C. R., 1960. Garmannia saucra, a new gobiid fish from Jamaica. Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. Vol. 73, pp. 281–5.Google Scholar
Rosa, H., 1962. Preparation of synopses on the biology of species of living aquatic organisms. FAO Fisheries Biology Synopsis, No. 1, 59 pp.Google Scholar
Ryland, J. S., 1969. Some shore fishes from Galway Bay. Ir. Nat. J., Vol. 16, pp. 127–31.Google Scholar
Sanzo, L., 1911. Distribuzione della papille cutanee (organi ciatiforme) e suo valore sistematico nei Gobi. Mitt. zool. Stn. Neapel, Vol. 20, pp. 249328.Google Scholar
Stanley, H., Chieffi, G., & Botte, V., 1965. Histological and histochemical observations on the testis of Gobius paganellus. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat., Bd. 65, pp. 350–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoll, L. M., 1957. Changes in the cytological structure of the adenohypophysis and gonads in juvenile Bathygobius soporator after pituitary implantation. Zoologica, N. Y., Vol. 42, Part 3, pp. 99104.Google Scholar
Tortonese, E., 1947. Ricerche zoologiche nell'Isola di Rodi (Mar Egeo)-Pesci. Boll. Pesca. Piscic. Idrobiol., Roma, Ann. 23, Vol. 2 (N.S.), Fasc. 2, pp. 143–92.Google Scholar
Tortonese, E., 1964. The main biogeographical features and problems of the Mediterranean fish fauna. Copeia, 1964, No. 1, pp. 98107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, A. C, 1960. Gobius capito as a British fish. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., ser. 13, Vol. 3, pp. 177–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, G. P., 1950. New fish names. Proc. R. zool. Soc. N.S.W., 19481949, p. 44.Google Scholar
Williams, G., 1954. Fauna of Strangford Lough and neighbouring coasts. Proc. R. Ir. Acad. Vol. 56(B), pp. 29133.Google Scholar