Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:35:18.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age and growth of the forkbeard Phycis phycis (Gadidae) from the Azorean archipelago, North Atlantic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Ana Rita Costa Abecasis ,
Angela Canha ,
Dália Reis ,
Mário Rui Pinho  and
João Gil-Pereira
Ana Rita Costa Abecasis*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, Cais de Santa Cruz, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal
Angela Canha
Affiliation:
Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, Cais de Santa Cruz, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal
Dália Reis
Affiliation:
Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, Cais de Santa Cruz, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal
Mário Rui Pinho
Affiliation:
Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, Cais de Santa Cruz, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal
João Gil-Pereira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, Cais de Santa Cruz, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A.R.C. Abecasis, Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, Cais de Santa Cruz, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal email: ritascosta@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The forkbeard Phycis phycis is one of the main target species of the demersal fishery in the Azores, north-eastern Atlantic. Age and growth of the forkbeard were studied using 477 otoliths from individuals caught between April 2000 and August 2004. Otoliths were burned and sectioned, a preparation method that improved the easiness of readings. Individuals ranged from 21 to 71 cm in total length, and their estimated ages between 2 and 18 years old. Forkbeard is a relatively slow growing, long lived species, that does not show sexual dimorphism in growth. The von Bertalanffy growth parameters estimated for the Azorean forkbeard were L∞ = 79.64 cm, k = 0.09 yr−1 and t0 = −1.88 years.

Keywords

Phycis phycisforkbeardagegrowthotoliths
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , May 2009 , pp. 629 - 633
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abecasis, D., Costa, A.R., Pereira, J.G. and Pinho, M.R. (2006) Age and growth of bluemouth, Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) from the Azores. Fisheries Research 79, 148–154.Google Scholar
Beamish, R.J. and Fournier, D.A. (1981) A method for comparing the precision of a set of age determinations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 38, 982–83.Google Scholar
Bedford, B.C. (1983) A method for preparing sections of large numbers of otoliths embedded in black polyester resin. Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 41, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cailliet, G.M., Andrews, A.H., Burton, E.J., Watters, D.L., Kline, D.E. and Ferry-Graham, L.A. (2001) Age determination and validation studies of marine fishes: do deep-dwellers live longer? Experimental Gerontology 36, 739–764.Google Scholar
Campana, S.E. (2001) Accuracy, precision and quality control in age determination, including a review of the use and abuse of age validation methods. Journal of Fish Biology 59, 197–242.Google Scholar
Carpentier, A., Dufor, J.L. and Verin, Y. (1991) Techniques de lectures des otolithes de gadidés en coupe fines, extension à d'autres espèces. In Bagliniere, J.-L., Castanet, J., Conand, F. and Meunier, F.J. (eds.) Tissus durs et âge individuel des vertébrés. Collection Colloques et Séminaires, ORSTOM–INRA: Paris, pp. 59–70.Google Scholar
Casas, J.M. and Piñeiro, C. (2000) Growth and age estimation of greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides Brunnich, 1768) in the north and northwest of the Iberian Peninsula (ICES Division VIIIc and IXa). Fisheries Research 47, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casselman, J.M. (1987) Determination of age and growth. In Weatherley, A.H. and Gill, H.S. (eds.) The biology of fish growth. London: Academic Press, pp. 209–242.Google Scholar
Chang, W.B. (1982) A statistical method for evaluating the reproducibility of age determinations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 39, 1208–1210.Google Scholar
Cohen, D., Inada, T., Iwamoto, T. and Scialabba, N. (1990) FAO Species Catalogue. Volume 10. Gadiform fishes of the world (Order Gadiformes). Rome: FAO Fisheries Synopsis.Google Scholar
Deree, H.L. (1999) Age and growth, dietary habits, and parasitism of the fourbeard rockling, Enchelyopus cimbrius, from the Gulf of Maine. Fishery Bulletin 97, 39–52.Google Scholar
Grós, M.P., Silva, H.M. and Menezes, G.M. (1995) Estudo preliminar da selectividade do anzol ao goraz, Pagellus bogaraveo e ao boca-negra, Helicolenus dactylopterus. Arquivos do DOP. Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, Horta, Portugal. Série Estudos No.5/95Google Scholar
Kimura, D.D. (1980) Likelihood methods for the Von Bertalanffy growth curve. Fishery Bulletin 77, 765–775.Google Scholar
Matarrese, A., D'Onghia, G., Basanisi, M. and Mastrototaro, F. (1998) Spawning and recruitment of Phycis blennoides (Phycidae) from the north-western Ionian Sea (middle-eastern Mediterranean). Italian Journal of Zoology 65, 203–209.Google Scholar
Menezes, G.M. (1996) Interacções tecnológicas na pesca demersal dos Açores. Research study submitted to gain access to the position of Research Assistant at the University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.Google Scholar
Menezes, G.M. (2003) Demersal fish assemblages in the Atlantic Archipelagos of the Azores, Madeira, and Cape Verde. PhD thesis. University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.Google Scholar
Morales-Nin, B. (1992) Determinación del crecimiento de peces óseos en base a la microestrutura de los otolitos. Rome: FAO Fisheries Technical Document, No. 322, 58 pp.Google Scholar
Morales-Nin, B., Torres, G.J., Lombarte, A. and Recasens, L. (1998) Otolith growth and age estimation in the European hake. Journal of Fish Biology 53, 1155–1168.Google Scholar
Morato, T., Solà, E., Grós, M.P. and Menezes, G. (1999) Diets of forkbeard (Phycis phycis) and conger eel (Conger conger) off the Azores during spring of 1996 and 1997. Arquipélago—Life and Marine Sciences 17, 51–64.Google Scholar
Morato, T., Afonso, P., Lourinho, P., Nash, R.D.M. and Santos, R.S. (2003) Reproductive biology and recruitment of the white sea bream in the Azores. Journal of Fish Biology 63, 59–72.Google Scholar
Papaconstantinou, C. and Caragitsou, E. (1989) Feeding interactions between two sympatric species Pagrus pagrus and Phycis phycis around Kastellorizo island (Dodecanese, Greece). Fisheries Research 7, 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinho, M.R. (2003) Abundance estimation and management of Azorean demersal species. PhD thesis. Department of Oceanography and Fisheries, University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.Google Scholar
Silva, H.M. (1986) Reproduction of the forkbeard Phycis phycis (Linnaeus, 1766) in Azorean waters. ICES Demersal Committee, CM 1986/G: 60.Google Scholar
Silva, H.M. and Krug, H.M. (1992) Virtual population analysis of the forkbeard Phycis phycis (Linnaeus, 1766), in the Azores. Arquipélago—Life and Marine Sciences 10, 5–12.Google Scholar
Williams, T. and Bedford, B.C. (1974) The use of otoliths for age determination. In Bagenal, T.B. (ed.) The ageing of fish, proceedings of an international symposium. Surrey: Unwin Brothers, pp. 114–123.Google Scholar