Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:13:29.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feeding ecology of monkfish Lophius gastrophysus in the south-western Atlantic Ocean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2008

M.F.M. Valentim ,
E.P. Caramaschi  and
M. Vianna
M.F.M. Valentim*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, CCS/IB, Deptartamento de Ecologia Deptartamento de Biologia Marinha, Avenida Pau Brasil, 211 Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, PB 68020, PC 21941-541- RJ, Brazil
E.P. Caramaschi
Affiliation:
Deptartamento de Biologia Marinha, Avenida Pau Brasil, 211 Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, PB 68020, PC 21941-541- RJ, Brazil
M. Vianna
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, CCS/IB, Deptartamento de Ecologia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Maria de Fátima Moraes ValentimUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Instituto de Biologia Departamento de Ecologia Laboratório de Ecologia de Peixes Avenida Pau Brasil, 211 Ilha do Fundão Rio de JanieroBrazil 21941–541 frequicultura@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The diet of the monkfish Lophius gastrophysus is described based on the analysis of stomach contents, for the south-western Atlantic from samples landed in the fishing port of Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil, from April 2004 to March 2006. Feeding intensity, measured as the presence or absence of contents in stomachs, and differences in the items' composition were analysed by sex, size-class and season. High feeding intensity predominated for females >32 cm and for males <31 cm. There was no seasonal pattern in the occurrence of full or empty stomachs. The most important category in the diet was fish with 25 identified species. Dactylopterus volitans showed the highest alimentary index value, mainly because of the feeding of juvenile monkfish. The second most important category was Mollusca, represented mainly by squid. No relationships between predator- and prey-lengths and weights were observed; but there was a tendency to consume light and small prey independently of the size of the monkfish.

Keywords

Lophiusstomach contentdiettemporal variationsize-classes variationpredator–prey relationshipBrazil
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 205 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, M.P., Musick, J.A. and Colvocoresses, J.A. (1996) Food and ontogenetic shifts in feeding of the goosefish, Lophius americanus. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science 18, 99–103.Google Scholar
Bigelow, H.B. and Schroeder, W.C. (1953) Fishes of the Gulf of Maine. Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of the Interior, Fishery Bulletin 53, 1–577.Google Scholar
Caruso, J.H. (1983) The systematics and distribution of the lophiid anglerfishes: II. Revisions of the genera Lophiomus and Lophius. Copeia 1, 11–30.Google Scholar
Crozier, W.W. (1985) Observations on the food and feeding of the angler-fish Lophius piscatorius L., in the northen Irish Sea. Journal of Fish Biology 27, 655–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, J.L. and Menezes, N.A. (1978) Manual dos peixes marinhos do Sudeste do Brasil. II. Teleostei (1). Museu de Zoologia, USP, São Paulo, 110 pp.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, J.L., Santos, A.P., Yamaguti, N., Bernardes, R.A. and Rossi-Wongtschowski, C.L.D.B. (2002) Peixes da zona econômica exclusiva da região sudeste-sul do Brasil: Levantamento com rede de meia-água. Ed. EDUSP: Imprensa de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Gerking, S.D. (1994) Feeding ecology of fish. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haimovici, M., Wongtschowski, C., Bernardes, R.A., Santos, R.A. and Fischer, L.G. (2002) Relatório preliminar sobre Lophius gastrophysus. Prospecção de arrasto de fundo. Programa REVIZEE-Score-Sul. 8 p.Google Scholar
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T. Ryan, P.D. (2003) Past Palaentological Statistics, Version 1.28. Disponível em: wwww.folk.uio.no/ohammer/past. Accessed July 2006.Google Scholar
Hyslop, E.J. (1980) Stomach content analysis: a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology 17, 411–429.Google Scholar
Kawakami, E. and Vazzoler, G. (1980) Método gráfico de índice alimentar aplicado no estudo de alimentação de peixes. Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico 29, 205–207.Google Scholar
Laurenson, C.H. and Priede, I.G. (2005) The diet and trophic ecology of anglerfish Lophius piscatorius at the Shetland Islands. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 419–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurenson, C.H., Hudson, I.R., Jones, D.O.B. and Priede, I.G. (2004) Deep water observations of anglerfish (Lophius piscatorius L.) in the north-eastern Atlantic ocean by means of remotely operated vehicle. Journal of Fish Biology 65, 947–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurenson, C.H., Johnson, A. and Priede, I.G. (2005) Movements and growth of monkfish Lophius piscatorius tagged at the Shetland Islands, Northeastern Atlantic. Fisheries Research 71, 85–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muto, E.Y., Silva, M.H.C., Vera, G.R., Leite, S.S.M., Navarro, D.G. and Rossi-Wongtschowski, C.L.D.B. (2005) Alimentação e relações tróficas de peixes demersais da plataforma externa e talude superior da região sudeste-sul do Brasil. Série Documentos REVIZEE-Score Sul. 64 pp.Google Scholar
Nikolsky, G.V. (1978) The ecology of fishes. Neptune City: T.F.H. Publications.Google Scholar
Olaso, I., Pereda, P. and González, R. (1982) The feeding of young angler fishes (Lophius budegassa Spinola and L. piscatorius L.) in divisions VIIIc and IXa of ICES. ICESCM 1982/G:38 p.Google Scholar
Paxton, J.R. and Eschmeyer, W.N. (1998) Encyclopedia of fishes. 2nd edn. Boston: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Perez, J.A.A. and Wahrlich, R. (2005) A bycatch assessment of the gillnet monkfish Lophius gastrophysus fishery off southern Brazil. Fisheries Research 72, 81–95.Google Scholar
Perez, J.A.A., Pezzuto, P.R. and Andrade, H.A. (2005) Biomass assessment of the monkfish Lophius gastrophysus stock exploited by a new deep-water fishery in southern Brazil. Fisheries Research 72, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, J.A.A., Pezzuto, P.R., Andrade, H.A., Schwingel, P.R., Rodrigues-Ribeiro, M. and Wahrlich, R. (2002) O ordenamento de uma nova pescaria direcionada ao peixe-sapo (Lophius gastrophysus) no sudeste e sul do Brasil. Notas Técnicas da FACIMAR 6, 65–83.Google Scholar
Preciado, I., Velasco, F., Olaso, I. and Landa, J. (2006) Feeding ecology of black anglerfish Lophius budegassa: seasonal, bathymetric and ontogenetic shifts. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 86, 877–884.Google Scholar
Sánchez, G., Calienes, R. and Zuta, S. (2000) El Niño 1997–98 in the Peruvian ecosystem. CalCOFl Report 41, 62–86.Google Scholar
Scharf, F.S., Juanes, F. and Rountree, R.A. (2000) Predator size–prey size relationships of marine fish predators: interspecific variation and effects of ontogeny and body size on trophic-niche breadth. Marine Ecology Progress Series 208, 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soares, L.S.H., Gasalla, M.A., Rios, M.A.T., Arrasa, M.V. and Rossi-Wongtschowski, C.L.D.B. (1993) Grupos tróficos de onze espécies dominantes de peixes demersais da plataforma continental interna de Ubatuba, Brasil. Publicação Especial do Instituto Oceanográfico 10, 189–198.Google Scholar
Vianna, M. and Almeida, T. (2005) Bony fish bycatch in the southern Brazil pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis) fishery. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 48, 611–623.Google Scholar
Wahrlich, R., Perez, J.A.A. and Lopes, F.R.A. (2004) Aspectos tecnológicos da pesca do peixe-sapo (Lophius gastrophysus) com rede de emalhar no sudeste e sul do Brasil. Boletim do Instituto Pesca 30, 87–98.Google Scholar
Wootton, R.J. (1990) Ecology of teleost fishes. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Zavala-Camin, L.A. (1996) Introdução aos estudos sobre alimentação natural em peixes. Maringá: Eduem. Nupelia. 129 pp.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1996) Biostatistical analysis. 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar