Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:45:48.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hydroid of the Anthomedusa Bougainvillia Britannica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

C. Edwards
C. Edwards
Affiliation:
The Marine Station, Millport
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The hydroid of the Anthomedusa Bougainvillia britannica Forbes has not been known with certainty, though its identity with B. flavida Hartlaub has appeared probable.

From colonies found on Aporrhais pespelecani in the Firth of Clyde medusae of B. britannica have been reared. A description and figures of the hydroid and the young stages of the medusa are given.

Bougainvillia flavida Hartlaub and B. linearis (Alder) are junior synonyms of B. britannica Forbes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , February 1964 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alder, J., 1862. Supplement to a catalogue of the zoophytes of Northumberland and Durham. Trans. Tyneside Nat. Fld Cl, Vol. 5, pp. 225–47, Pls. 8–11.Google Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1864. On the construction and limitation of genera among the Hydroida. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 3, Vol. 13, pp. 345–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1871–1872. A Monograph of the Gymnoblastic or Tubularian Hydroids. xxiv + 450 pp., 23 Pls. London: Ray Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E., 1841. Contributions to British actinology. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 1, Vol. 7, pp. 81–5, Pl 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E., 1848. A Monograph of the British Naked-eyed Medusae. 104 pp., 13 Pls. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C., 1897. Die Hydromedusen Helgolands. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., Abt. Helgoland, N.F., Bd. 2, Heft 1, pp. 449–536, Pls. 14–23.Google Scholar
Hartlaub, C., 1911. Craspedote Medusen. Teil 1, Lief. 2, Familie III, Margelidae. Nord. Plankt, Lief. 15, pp. 137–235.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1926. Medusae. Part II. Anthomedusae. Dan. Ingolf-Exped., Vol. 5, Pt. 10, pp. 1–102, Pls. 1, 2.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1927. The Hydromedusae of the Danish waters. K. danske vidensk. Selsk., Raekke 8, Bd. 12, No. 1, 291 pp.Google Scholar
Rees, W. J., 1956. A revision of the hydroid genus Perigonimus M. Sars, 1846. Bull. Brit. Mus. (nat. Hist.), Zoology, Vol. 3, pp. 337–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1953. The Medusae of the British Isles: Anthomedusae, Leptomedusae, Limnomedusae, Trachymedusae and Narcomedusae. xii + 530 pp., 35 Pls. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vannucci, M. & Rees, W. J., 1961. A revision of the genus Bougainvillia (Anthomedusae). Bol. Inst. oceanogr. S. Paulo, T. 11, pp. 57–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar