Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:21:43.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new species of Dercitus (Stoeba) from the Atlantic Ocean (Porifera: Demospongiae: Astrophorida)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2015

George Garcia Santos
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Nelson Chaves, s/n Cidade Universitária 50.373-970, Recife, PE, Brazil
Ulisses Pinheiro*
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Nelson Chaves, s/n Cidade Universitária 50.373-970, Recife, PE, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:U. Pinheiro, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Nelson Chaves, s/n Cidade Universitária 50.373-970, Recife, PE, Brazil email: uspinheiro@hotmail.com

Abstract

Dercitus (Stoeba) pseudodiscorhabda sp. nov. is described from the tropical western Atlantic. It is the only Dercitus (Stoeba) with four-rayed calthrops and discorhabds-like sanidasters. This is the 16th species of the genus to be recognized worldwide, the sixth from the Atlantic. The new species is compared with all its congeners worldwide.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carter, H.J. (1880) Report on specimens dredged up from the Gulf of Manaar and presented to the Liverpool Free Museum by Capt. W.H. Cawne Warren. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 31, 129156.Google Scholar
Dendy, A. (1905) Report on the sponges collected by Professor Herdman, at Ceylon, in 1902. In Herdman, W.A. (ed) Report to the government of Ceylon on the pearl oyster fisheries of the Gulf of Manaar. Volume 3 (Supplement 18). London: Royal Society, pp. 57246.Google Scholar
Desqueyroux-Faúndez, R. and van Soest, R.W.M. (1997) Shallow water Demosponges of the Galápagos Islands. Revue suisse de Zoologie 104, 379467.Google Scholar
Gray, J.E. (1867) Notes on the arrangement of sponges, with the descriptions of some new genera. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1867, 492558, pls XXVII–XXVIII.Google Scholar
Hajdu, E., Peixinho, S. and Fernandez, J.C.C. (2011) Esponjas marinhas da Bahia: guia de campo e laboratório. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional, 276 pp. [Série Livros 45.]Google Scholar
Hentschel, E. (1909) Tetraxonida. I. Teil. In Michaelsen, W. and Hartmeyer, R. (eds) Die Fauna Südwest-Australiens. Ergebnisse der Hamburger südwest-australischen Forschungsreise 1905. Volume 2. Jena: Fischer, pp. 347402.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, M.W. (1930) The sponges of California. Stanford University Bulletin, 5, 2429.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, M.W. (1932) The marine and fresh-water sponges of California. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 81, 1140.Google Scholar
von Lendenfeld, R. (1894) Die Tetractinelliden der Adria. (Mit einem Anhange über die Lithistiden). Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaften Klasse 61, 91204.Google Scholar
von Lendenfeld, R. (1903) Porifera. Tetraxonia. Das Tierreich 19, 1168.Google Scholar
Maldonado, M. (2002) Family Pachastrellidae. In Hooper, J.N.A. and Van Soest, R.W.M. (eds) Systema Porifera. A guide to the classification of sponges. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, pp. 141162.Google Scholar
Moraes, F. and Muricy, G. (2007) A new species of Stoeba (Demospongiae: Astrophorida) from oceanic islands off north-eastern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 13871393.Google Scholar
Sarà, M. (1959) Specie nuove di Demospongie provenienti da acque superficiali del golfo di Napoli. Annuario dell’ Istituto e Museo de Zoologia dell’ Università di Napoli 11, 122.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. (1868) Die Spongien der Küste von Algier. Mit Nachträgen zu den Spongien des Adriatischen Meeres (Drittes Supplement). Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, pp. 44.Google Scholar
Sollas, W.J. (1888) Report on the Tetractinellida collected by H.M.S. ‘Challenger’ during the years 1873–1876. Reports of the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. “Challenger” 25, 1458.Google Scholar
van Soest, R.W.M., Beglinger, E.J. and De Voogd, N.J. (2010) Skeletons in confusion: a review of astrophorid sponges with (dicho-)calthrops as structural megascleres (Porifera, Demospongiae, Astrophorida). ZooKeys 68, 188.Google Scholar
van Soest, R.W.M., Boury-Esnault, N., Hooper, J.N.A., Rützler, K., de Voogd, N.J., Alvarez de Glasby, B., Hajdu, E., Pisera, A.B., Manconi, R., Schoenberg, C., Janussen, D., Tabachnick, K.R., Klautau, M., Picton, B., Kelly, M., Vacelet, J., Dohrmann, M. and Díaz, M.C. (2014) World Porifera database. Available at http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera (accessed 4 January 2014).Google Scholar
Sollas, I.B.J. (1902) On the sponges collected during the ‘Skeat Expedition’ to the Malay Peninsula 1899–1900. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 2, 210221.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, P.R., Hooper, J.N.A. and Pitcher, R. (2010) The most common sponges on the Great Barrier Reef seabed, Australia, include species new to science (Phylum Porifera). Zootaxa 2616, 130.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. (1904) Spongiaires des Açores. Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques Accomplies par le Prince Albert 1er de Monaco 25, 1218.Google Scholar