Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:32:17.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Occurrence of the entocommensal rhynchocoelan, Malacobdella grossa, in the oval piddock, Zirfaea crispata, on the Yorkshire coast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Ray Gibson
Ray Gibson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Various aspects have been studied of the relationship between the entocommensal nemertean Malacobdella grossa [O.F. Müller, 1776] and its host on the Yorkshire coast, the lamellibranch Zirfaea crispata L. Larger host populations clearly show both a higher overall percentage infection and greater numbers of multiple infections. Larger hosts tend to harbour larger Malacobdella; allied with this fact is the conclusion that the older the host population the more restricted is the availability of potential hosts for future infections.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , June 1967 , pp. 301 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, N. T. J., 1959. Statistical Methods in Biology. 200 pp. London: English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Beneden, R. J. Van & Hesse, C. E., 1864. Recherches sur les Bdellodes (Hirudinèes) et les Trèmatodes marins. Mèm. Acad. R. Belg., T. 34, pp. 56–9.Google Scholar
Blainville, H. M. de, 1827. Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, T. 47, pp. 270–71. Strasbourg and Paris: Ed. F. G. Levrault.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E., 1845 a. Sur l'organisation d'un animal nouveau appartenant au sousembranchement des vers ou animaux annalès. C.r. Sèanc. hebd. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 20, pp. 1342–5.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E., 1845 b. Sur l'organisation d'un animal appartenant au sous-embranchement des annalés. Le genre Malacobdelle (Malacobdella) De Blainville. Anns Sci. nat., Sèr. 3, T. 12, pp. 364–79.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E., 1847. Sur l'organisation des vers. Ann. Sci. nat., Sér. 3, T. 8, pp. 119–49Google Scholar
Blanchard, E., 1849. Second mémoire sur l'organisation des Malacobdelles. Anns Sci. nat., Sér. 3, T. 12, pp. 267–76.Google Scholar
Brunberg, L., 1964. On the nemertean fauna of Danish waters. Ophelia, Vol. I, pp. 77–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürger, O., 1895. Die Nemertinen des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeresabschnitte. Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel, Bd. 22, pp. 1–743.Google Scholar
Bürger, O., 1897–1907. Nemertini. In Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tier-Reichs. Bd. 4 (Supplement), Leipzig.Google Scholar
Coe, W. R., 1905. Nemerteans of the west and northwest coasts of America. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv., Vol. 47, pp. 1–318.Google Scholar
Coe, W. R., 1943. Biology of the nemerteans of the Atlantic coast of North America. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci., Vol. 35, pp. 129–328.Google Scholar
Coe, W. R., 1945. Malacobdella minuta, a new commensal nemertean. J. Wash. Acad. Sci., Vol. 35, pp. 65–7.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G., 1828. Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles. T. 57, p. 566. Strasbourg and Paris: Ed. F. G Levrault.Google Scholar
Dakin, W. J., 1909. In a report on work carried out on the sense organs of certain Mollusca. Rep. Lpool mar. Biol. Comm., No. 23, pp. 15–17.Google Scholar
Eggers, F., 1935–1936. Zur Bewegungsphysiologie von Malacobdella grossa Müll. Z. wiss. Zool., Bd. 147, pp. 101–31.Google Scholar
Gering, G., 1911. Beiträge zur Kenntniss von Malacobdella grossa (Müll.). Z. wiss. Zool., Bd. 97, pp. 673–720.Google Scholar
Giard, A., 1888. Le laboratoire de Wimereux en 1888 (recherches fauniques). Bull. sci. Fr. Belg., T. 19, pp. 492–513.Google Scholar
Guberlet, J. E., 1925–1928. Malacobdella grossa from the Pacific coast of North America. Publs Puget Sound mar. biol. Stn, Vol. 5, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, C. K., 1877–1878. Zur Anatomie und Ontogenie von Malacobdella. Niederl. Arch. Zool., Bd. 4, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. H., 1951. The Invertebrates: Vol. 2—Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela. 550 pp. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jackson, L. H., 1935. Sense-organs in Malacobdella, Nature, Lond., Vol. 135, p. 792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, G., 1865. A Catalogue of the British Non-parasitical Worms in the Collection of the British Museum. 365 pp., London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Joubin, L., 1899. Sur la répartition des Némertes dans quelques localités des côtes de France. C.r. Séanc. hebd. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 109, pp. 231–33.Google Scholar
Joubin, L., 1890. Recherches sur les Turbellariés des côtes de France (Némertes). Arch. Zool. exp. gén., Série 2, T. 8, pp. 461–602.Google Scholar
Joubin, L., 1894. Les Némertiens. 235 pp. Paris: Faune Française.Google Scholar
Kennel, J. von, 1877–1878. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Nemertinen. Arb. zool.-zootom. Inst. Wärzburg., Bd. 4, pp. 305–81.Google Scholar
Leidy, J., 1850–1851. Contributions to helminthology. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., Vol. 5, pp. 205–9.Google Scholar
Maclaren, N. H. W., 1901. On the blood vascular system of Malacobdella grossa. Zool. Anz., Bd. 24, pp. 126–9.Google Scholar
McMillin, H. C., 1924. The Life-History and Growth of the Razor Clam. 52 pp. Olympia: State of Washington, Department of Fisheries.Google Scholar
Müller, O. F., 1776. Zoologiae Danicae prodromus. 282 pp. Copenhagen: Havniae.Google Scholar
Müller, O. F., 1788. Zoologia Danica, No. 1. pp. 1–52. Copenhagen: Havniae.Google Scholar
Oersted, A. S., 1844. De Regionibus Marinus, Elementa Topographiae Historico naturalis freti Oeresund. Dissertation. 88 pp. Copenhagen: Havniae.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1928. Les parasites des Mollusques et les mollusques parasites. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., T. 53, pp. 158–89.Google Scholar
Porter, H. J. & Chestnut, A. F., 1960. The offshore clam fishery of North Carolina. Proc. natn. Shellfish Ass., Vol. 51, pp. 67–73.Google Scholar
Riches, T. H., 1893–1895. A list of the Nemertines of Plymouth Sound. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 3, pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riepen, O., 1933. Anatomie und Histologie von Malacobdella grossa (Müll.). Z. wiss. Zool, Bd. 143, pp. 323–496.Google Scholar
Ropes, J. W., 1963. The incidence of Malacobdella grossa in hard clams from Nantucket Sound, Massachusetts. Limnol. Oceanogr., Vol. 8, pp. 353–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semper, C. von, 1876–1877. Die verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der gegliederten Thiere. 3. Strobilation und segmentation. Arb. zool.-zootom. Inst. Würzburg, Bd. 3, pp. 115–404.Google Scholar
Smith, A. J., 1931. In Plymouth Marine Fauna. 2nd edit., 371 pp. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association.Google Scholar
Takakura, U., 1897. On a new species of Malacobdella (M. japonicd). Annot. zool. jap., Vol. I, pp. 105–12.Google Scholar
Tebble, N., 1966. British Bivalve Seashells, a Handbook for Identification. 212 pp. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Verrill, A. E., 1888–1892. The marine nemerteans of New England and adjacent waters. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci., Vol. 8, pp. 382–456.Google Scholar
Yamaoka, T., 1940. The fauna of Akkeshi Bay. 9. Nemertini. J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ., Series 6, Vol. 7, pp. 205–63.Google Scholar