Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:04:26.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Fertility of Marine Cladocera with a Note on the Formation of the Resting Egg in Evadne Nordmanni Loven and Podon Intermedius Lilljeborg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

C. Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen

Extract

A statistical study was made of the fertility of Evadne nordmanni, Podon intermedius, P. leuckarti and P. polyphemoides in the Clyde Sea-Area and of the former two species off Plymouth. The mean fertility of parthenogenetic females varies with different species. This is not correlated with the size of the species.

Within the species, Evadne nordmanni and Podon intermedius, there exists, in general, a positive correlation between the size and the fertility of parthenogenetic females.

The fertility of Evadne nordmanni is subject to seasonal variation. This is not correlated with fluctuations in the abundance of diatoms.

An inverse relationship was observed in Evadne nordmanni between the reproductive capacity of parthenogenetic females and the intensity of sexual reproduction.

A brief account was given of the formation of the resting egg in Evadne nordmanni and Podon intermedius.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. & Banta, A. M., 1929. Growth and maturation in the parthenogenetic and sexual eggsof Moina macrocopa. Journ. Morph., Vol. XLVIII, pp. 123–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apstein, C., 1910. Cladocera. Bull. Trimestr. Explor. Mer, Copenhagen, Pt. I, pp. 3951.Google Scholar
Berg, K., 1931. Studies on the genus Daphnia with special reference to the mode of reproduction. Vidensk. Medd. F. Dan. Naturh. Foren., Vol. XCII 212 pp.Google Scholar
Berg, K., 1934. Cyclic reproduction, sex determination and depression in the Cladocera. Biol. Rev., Vol. IX, pp. 139–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, C., 1942. On the fecundity of some gammarids. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXV, pp. 467–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, C., 1877. Zur Kenntnis des Baues und der Organisation des Polyphemiden. Denkschr. K. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-Naturw. Kl., Bd. XXXVII, pp. 137–60.Google Scholar
Cleve, P. T., 1900. The seasonal distribution of Atlantic plankton organisms. Goteborgs Vetensk. Handl., Vol. III, 369 pp.Google Scholar
Gibitz, A., 1922. Verbreitung und Abstammung mariner Cladoceren. Verhandl. Zool. Bot. Gese Wien, Bd. LXXI, pp. 85105.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C., 1936. The ecological relations between the herring and the plankton investigated with the Plankton Indicator. Part I. The object, plan and methods of the investigation. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, pp. 147–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joregenasen, O. M., 1933. On the marine Cladocera from the Northumbrian plankton. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIX, pp. 177226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilljeborg, W., 1900. Cladocera Sueciae. Nova Acta Reg. Soc. Sci. Ups., Ser. 3, Vol. XIX, 701 pp.Google Scholar
Marshall, S. M., 1937. In Director's Ann. Rep. Scot. Mar. Biol. Assoc., 19371938, p. 9.Google Scholar
Rammer, W., 1931. Mittelungen über marine Cladoceren. Biol. Zentr., Bd. LI, pp. 618–33.Google Scholar
Rammer, W., 1933 Die Cladoceren der ‘Meteor’-Expedition. In Wiss. Erg. Deutsch. Atlantischen Exped. Forsch. Vermess. ‘Meteor’, 19251927, Bd. XII, pp. 111–21.Google Scholar
Scott, T., 1905. A report on the free-swimming Crustacea found in the Firth of Clyde, 19011902. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. XXV, pp. 792805.Google Scholar
Sexton, E. W., 1928. On the rearing and breeding of Gammarus in laboratory conditions. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XV, pp. 3355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1938. Marine Ostracoda and Cladocera. The Zoology of Iceland, Vol. III, Pt. 32, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Uéno, M., 1934. The fresh-water Branchiopoda of Japan. III. Genus Daphnia of Japan. Mem. Coll. Sci., Kyoto, Vol. IX.Google Scholar