Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:06:42.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plankton Production Between the Yorkshire Coast and the Dogger Bank, 1933–1939

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. S. Wimpenny
R. S. Wimpenny
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Between March 1933 and June 19391 a series of vertical hauls with a plankton net has been made at a line of six stations 12 miles apart, the first lying off Flamborough Head and the last on the south-west patch of the Dogger Bank. This line was usually visited at monthly intervals, the net used being of the Hensen type fitted with bolting silk of 60 meshes to the inch and hauled to the surface by the counter-weight device introduced by Buchanan-Wollaston (1911). Hensen (1887) worked out a filtration coefficient for his net, and when this was applied to the dimensions of the one in use and the depth through which the vertical hauls were made, it was possible to express the catch in numbers per cubic metre of sea water. It was also possible to give the individual catches by weight, and it may not be without interest to observe, before passing on to deal with numbers, that the dry weights taken in 1936 varied between 0.2600 g. per m.3 in August and 0.0015 in February.

Although the net method of estimating plankton has often been decried as unreliable, Hensen net results have always given a consistent picture of relative plankton densities in the North Sea. Confidence arising from this consistency has not been lessened by a comparison of the net and sedimentation methods which has been made in respect of the May 1938 samples.

The sedimentation method consists in counting the entire deposit of microplankton which has settled on the floor of a glass cell containing a known volume of sea water.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , September 1944 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchanan-Wollaston, H. J., 1911. Report on the results of the fish-egg cruise made by the S.S. ‘Huxley’ in June, 1909. Internat. Fish. Invest., Mar. Biol. Assoc., Report lll (Southern Area), 1906–1908. H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
Hensen, V., 1887. Über die Bestimmung des Planktons. Jahresber. Komm. toiss. Untersuch. deutsch. Meere. Kiel.Google Scholar
Kemp, S., 1938. Oceanography and the fluctuations in the abundance of marine animals. Rep. Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci. London, p. 85.Google Scholar
Lucas, C. E., 1941. Phytoplankton in the North Sea, 1938–9. Pt. I. Diatoms. Hull Bull. Mar. Ecol., No. 8, Vol. II p. 19.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. S., 1933. Über quantitative Untersuchung von marinem Plankton mit Utermöhls umgekehrtem Mikroskop. Journ. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer, Vol. viii, p. 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, R. E. & Hardy, A. C., 1935. Phytoplankton and the herring. Pt. I,1921–32. Min. Agric. & Fish., Fish. Invest., Ser. 2, Vol. XIV, No. 2.Google Scholar
Savage, R. E. & Wimpenny, R. S., 1936. Phytoplankton and the herring. Pt. II, 1933 and 1934. Min. Agric. & Fish., Fish. Invest., Ser. 2, Vol. XV, No. 1.Google Scholar
Scherhag, R., 1937. Die Erwärmung der Arktis. Journ. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer, Vol. XII, p. 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar