Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:43:47.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recovery of rocky intertidal zonation: two years after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2015

Takashi Noda ,
Aiko Iwasaki  and
Keiichi Fukaya
Takashi Noda*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Aiko Iwasaki
Affiliation:
Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Keiichi Fukaya
Affiliation:
The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tachikawa, Tokyo, Japan
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:T. Noda, Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan email: noda@ees.hokudai.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To assess the course and status of recovery of rocky intertidal zonation after massive subsidence caused by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, from 2011 to 2013 we censused the vertical distribution of 10 dominant macrobenthic species (six sessile and four mobile species) in the mid-shore zone of 23 sites along the Sanriku coastline, 150–160 km north-northwest of the earthquake epicentre, and compared the vertical distributions of each species with their vertical distributions in the pre-earthquake period. The dynamics of rocky intertidal zonation varied substantially among species. Among sessile species, one barnacle dramatically increased in abundance and expanded its vertical range in 2011, but then decreased and completely disappeared from all plots by 2013. Zonations of other sessile species shifted downward following the subsidence in 2011. With some species, there was no clear change in abundance immediately after the earthquake, but they then began to increase and move upward after a few years; with other species, abundance continuously decreased. There was no clear change in the vertical distribution of any of the mobile species immediately after the earthquake. Abundance of two mobile species was unchanged, but abundance of the others decreased from 2012 and had not recovered as of 2013.

Keywords

benthosdistributiondisturbanceearthquakerocky intertidalseaweedsubsidencetsunamizonationPacific coast
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 96 , Issue 8 , December 2016 , pp. 1549 - 1555
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bodin, P. and Klinger, T. (1986) Coastal uplift and mortality of intertidal organisms caused by the September 1985 Mexico earthquakes. Science 233, 1071–1073.Google Scholar
Campbell, S.J., Pratchett, M.S., Anggoro, A.W., Ardiwijaya, R.L., Fadli, N., Herdiana, Y., Kartawijaya, T., Mahyiddin, D., Mukminin, A., Pardede, S.T., Rudi, E., Siregar, A.M. and Baird, A.H. (2007) Disturbance to coral reefs in Aceh, Northern Sumatra: impacts of the Sumatra–Andaman tsunami and pre-tsunami degradation. Atoll Research Bulletin 544, 55–78.Google Scholar
Castilla, J.C. (1988) Earthquake-caused coastal uplift and its effects on rocky intertidal kelp communities. Science 242, 440–443.Google Scholar
Castilla, J.C. and Oliva, D. (1990) Ecological consequences of coseismic uplift on the intertidal kelp belts of Lessonia nigrescens in central Chile. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 31, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castilla, J.C., Manríquez, P.H. and Camaño, A. (2010) Effects of rocky shore coseismic uplift and the 2010 Chilean mega-earthquake on intertidal biomarker species. Marine Ecology Progress Series 418, 17–23.Google Scholar
Chavanich, S., Siripong, A., Sojisuporn, P. and Menasveta, P. (2005) Impact of tsunami on the seafloor and corals in Thailand. Coral Reefs 24, 535–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J.H. (1961) The influence of intra-specific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus . Ecology 42, 710–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J.H. (1972) Community interactions on marine rocky intertidal shores. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 3, 169–192.Google Scholar
Dayton, P.K. (1971) Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecological Monographs 41, 351–389.Google Scholar
Fukaya, K., Okuda, T., Nakaoka, M., Hori, M. and Noda, T. (2010) Seasonality in the strength and spatial scale of processes determining intertidal barnacle population growth. Journal of Animal Ecology 79, 1270–1279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haven, S.B. (1972) Effects of land level changes on intertidal invertebrates with discussion of postearthquake ecological succession. In Committee on the Alaska Earthquake of the Division of Earth Sciences National Research Council (ed.) The Great Alaska Earthquake of 1964: biology. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science, Publication 1604, pp. 82–106.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J. and Hartnoll, R.G. (1985) Factors determining the upper limits of intertidal canopy-forming algae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 20, 265–271.Google Scholar
Helmuth, B., Mieszkowska, N., Moore, P. and Hawkins, S.J. (2006) Living on the edge of two changing worlds: forecasting the responses to climate change of rocky intertidal ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 37, 373–404.Google Scholar
Johansen, H.W. (1972) Effects of elevation changes on benthic algae in Prince William Sound. In Committee on the Alaska Earthquake of the Division of Earth Sciences National Research Council (ed.) The Great Alaska Earthquake of 1964: biology. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science, Publication 1604, pp. 35–68.Google Scholar
Kendall, M.A., Paterson, G.L.J., Aryuthaka, C., Nimsantijaroena, S., Kongkaeouw, W. and Whanpetch, N. (2006) Impact of the 2004 tsunami on intertidal sediment and rocky shore assemblages in Ranong and Phang Nga provinces, Thailand. Phuket Marine Biological Center Research Bulletin 67, 63–75.Google Scholar
Kinlan, B.P. and Gaines, S.D. (2003) Propagule dispersal in marine and terrestrial environments: a community perspective. Ecology 84, 2007–2020.Google Scholar
Lay, T. and Kanamori, H. (2011) Insights from the great 2011 Japan earthquake. Physics Today 64, 33–39.Google Scholar
Lohse, D.P. (1993) The importance of secondary substratum in a rocky intertidal community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 166, 1–17.Google Scholar
Lomovasky, B.J., Firstater, F.N., Salazar, A.G., Mendo, J. and Iribarne, O.O. (2011) Macro benthic community assemblage before and after the 2007 tsunami and earthquake at Paracas Bay, Peru. Journal of Sea Research 65, 205–212.Google Scholar
Menge, B.A. (1976) Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: role of predation, competition, and environmental heterogeneity. Ecological Monographs 46, 355–393.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, Y. and Noda, T. (2004) Effects of mussels on competitively inferior species: competitive exclusion to facilitation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 276, 293–298.Google Scholar
Mori, N., Takahashi, T., Yasuda, T. and Yanagisawa, H. (2011) Survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami inundation and run-up. Geophysical Research Letters 38, 6 pp. doi: 10.1029/2011GL049210.Google Scholar
Munroe, D.M. and Noda, T. (2010) Physical and biological factors contributing to changes in the relative importance of recruitment to population dynamics in open populations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 412, 151–162.Google Scholar
Nakaoka, M., Ito, N., Yamamoto, T., Okuda, T. and Noda, T. (2006) Similarity of rocky intertidal assemblages along the Pacific coast of Japan: effects of spatial scales and geographic distance. Ecological Research 21, 425–435.Google Scholar
Okuda, T., Noda, T., Yamamoto, T., Ito, N. and Nakaoka, M. (2004) Latitudinal gradient of species diversity: multi-scale variability in rocky intertidal sessile assemblages along the Northwestern Pacific coast. Population Ecology 46, 159–170.Google Scholar
Paine, R.T. (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. American Naturalist 100, 65–75.Google Scholar
Paine, R.T. (1974) Intertidal community structure: experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia 15, 93–120.Google Scholar
Paine, R.T. and Levin, S.A. (1981) Intertidal landscapes: disturbance and the dynamics of pattern. Ecological Monographs 51, 145–178.Google Scholar
Parker, K.R. and Wiens, J.A. (2005) Assessing recovery following environmental accidents: environmental variation, ecological assumptions, and strategies. Ecological Applications 15, 2037–2051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson Edwards, J.K., Kulkanri, S., Jeyabaskaran, R., Lazarus, S., Mary, A., Venkataraman, K., Das, S.P., Tamelander, J., Rajasuriya, A., Jayakumar, K., Kumaraguru, A.K., Marimuthu, N., Sluka, R. and Jerald Wilson, J. (2006) The effects of the 2004 tsunami on mainland India and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. In Wilkinson, C., Souter, D. and Goldberg, J. (eds) Status of coral reefs in tsunami affected countries: 2005. Townsville: Australian Institute for Marine Studies, pp. 85–97.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, D. and Hawkins, S. (1996) Intertidal ecology. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Sanpanich, K., Wells, F.E. and Chitramvong, Y. (2006) Effects of the 26 December 2004 tsunami on littorinid molluscs near Phuket, Thailand. Journal of Molluscan Studies 72, 311–313.Google Scholar
Schonbeck, M.W. and Norton, T.A. (1980) Factors controlling the lower limits of fucoid algae on the shore. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 43, 131–151.Google Scholar
Sousa, W.P. (1984) Intertidal mosaics: patch size, propagule availability, and spatially variable patterns of succession. Ecology 65, 1918–1935.Google Scholar
Stephenson, T.A. and Stephenson, A. (1972) Life between tidemarks on rocky shores. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
Suchanek, T.H. (1986) Mussels and their role in structuring rocky shore communities. In Moore, P.G. and Seed, R. (eds) The ecology of rocky coasts. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp. 70–96.Google Scholar
Tajima, F., Mori, J. and Kennett, B.L.N. (2013) A review of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake (Mw 9.0): large-scale rupture across heterogeneous plate coupling. Tectonophysics 586, 15–34.Google Scholar
Takami, H., Won, N-I. and Kawamura, T. (2013) Impacts of the 2011 mega-earthquake and tsunami on abalone Haliotis discus hannai and sea urchin Strongylocentrotus nudus populations at Oshika Peninsula, Miyagi, Japan. Fisheries Oceanography 22, 113–120.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. and Denley, E.J. (1984) Paradigms, explanations and generalizations in models for the structure of intertidal communities on rocky shores. In Strong, D.R. Jr, Simberloff, D., Abele, L.G. and Thistle, A.B. (eds) Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 151–180.Google Scholar
Wennberg, T. (1992) Colonization and succession of macroalgae on a breakwater in Laholm Bay, a eutrophicated brackish water area (SW Sweden). Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 78, 65–77.Google Scholar
Whanpetch, N., Nakaoka, M., Mukai, H., Suzuki, T., Nojima, S., Kawai, T. and Aryuthaka, C. (2010) Temporal changes in benthic communities of seagrass beds impacted by a tsunami in the Andaman Sea, Thailand. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 87, 246–252.Google Scholar
Wijetunge, J.J. (2006) Tsunami on 26 December 2004: spatial distribution of tsunami height and the extent of inundation in Sri Lanka. Science of Tsunami Hazards 24, 225–239.Google Scholar
Wootton, J.T. (1993) Size-dependent competition: effects on the dynamics vs. the endpoint of mussel bed succession. Ecology 74, 195–206.Google Scholar