Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:48:53.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Aspects of the Biology of the Sandeel, Ammodytes Tobianus L., in Langstone Harbour, Hampshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P. J. Reay
P. J. Reay
Affiliation:
Marine Resourees Research Unit, Portsmouth Polytechnic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper is concerned with the biology of the sandeel, Ammodytes tobianus L., in Langstone Harbour, Hampshire; this was the main area studied in a survey of sandeel populations which are exploited for bait along the south coast of England. Aspects considered are the relative occurrence of the spawning groups; spawning seasons; population structure in terms of length, sex, age and maturity; mortality; annual growth; seasonal growth; and condition. The seasonal pattern of otolith growth and its application to the back-calculation technique, has been described elsewhere (Reay, 1972).

A. tobianus forms over 95% of the total sandeel catch in Langstone Harbour. Hyperoplus lanceolatus (Le Sauvage) is the only other species to occur regularly, but individuals of the three other British species, A. marinus Raitt, H. immaculatus (Corbin), and Gymnammodytes semisquamatus (Jourdain), have also been recorded. This pattern of species composition is also found in the other inshore areas studied along the south coast.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , May 1973 , pp. 325 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahr, K., 1935. Der kleine sandaal(Ammodytes tobianus L.). Zeitschrift fiir Fischerei und deren Hilfswissensch aften, 33, 125–;219.Google Scholar
Brett, J. R., 1970. Temperature: Animals. Fishes. In Marine Ecology (ed. O., Kinne), 1, Part 1, pp. 515–;60. London, New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Brown, M. E., 1945. The growth of the brown trout (Salmo trutta L). Pts. I—III. Journal of Experimental Biology, 22, 118–;55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, P. G., 1950 a. Ammodytes immaculatus, a new species of sandeel found in European seas. Nature, London, 166, 525.Google Scholar
Corbin, P. G., 1950 b. The occurrence of the smooth sandeel, Gymnammodytes semisquamatus (Jourdain) in the Plymouth area, with notes on G. cicerelus (Rafinesque) and G. capensis (Barnard). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 29, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, P. G. & Vati, V., 1949. The post-larval sandeels (Ammodytidae) of the Celtic Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 28, 287–;313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forest, J., 1950. Observations sur deux Ammodytides des cótes francaises, Ammodytes lanceolatus et Ammodytes lancea. Journal du Conseil. Conseil permanent international pour I'exploration de la mer, 16, 179–;82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, R. G., 1969. Reproduction and feeding of Argentina sphyraena (Isospondyli) in the Clyde sea area. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 785–;805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickling, C. F., 1930. The natural history of the hake. Pt. Ill; seasonal changes in the condition of the hake. Fishery Investigations, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Series II, 12 (1), 78 pp.Google Scholar
Inoue, A., Takamori, S., Kuniyuki, K., Kobayashi, S. & Nishina, S., 1967. Studies on the fishery biology of the sand-lance, Ammodytes personatus Girard. Bulletin of the Naikai Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory, 25 (121), 1–;335.Google Scholar
KÁNDLER, R., 1941. Úntersuchungen uber Fortpflanzung, Wachstum und Variabilitat der Arten des Sandaals in Ost- und Nordsee, mit besonderer Berucksichtigung der Saisonrassen von Ammodytes tobianus L. Kieler Meeresforschungen, 5, 45–;145.Google Scholar
Love, R. M., 1970. The chemical biology of fishes, 547 pp. London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Macer, C. T., 1965. The distribution of larval sandeels (Ammodytidae) in the southern North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 45, 187–;207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macer, C. T., 1966. Sandeels (Ammodytidae) in the south-western North Sea; their biology and fishery. Fishery Investigations, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Series 2, 24 (6), 1–;55.Google Scholar
Masterman, A. T., 1895. The life history and growth of the lesser sandeel (Ammodytes tobianus). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (6), 16, 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G. & Carrie, B. G. A., 1964. The production of zooplankton in Southampton Water. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie, 49, 185–;232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reay, P. J., 1970. Synopsis of biological data on North Atlantic sandeels of the genus Ammodytes. Fisheries Synopsis F.A.O. 82, V. 42 pp.Google Scholar
Reay, P. J., 1972. The seasonal pattern of otolith growth and its application to the back-calculation technique in Ammodytes tobianus. Journal du Conseil. Conseil permanent international pour Vexploration de la Mer, 34, 485–;504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricker, W. E., 1958. Handbook of computations for biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 119, 1–;300.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S. & Demir, , Necla, , 1971. On the seasonal abundance of young fish. XII. The years 1967, 1968, 1969 and 1970. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 127–;31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, D. R., 1962. Evidence for the absence of an endogeneous growth rate rhythm in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 6, 91–;3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomopoulos, A., 1954. Sur l'oeuf d'equille (Ammodytes tobianus L.). Bulletin de la Societe Zoologique de France, 79, 112–;20.Google Scholar
Waind, K. D. & Reay, P. J., 1971. Notes of biological aspects of the Irish sandeel fishery 1971. Bord Iascaigh Mhara, Resource Development Paper (December 1971).Google Scholar
Wood, R. J., 1958. Fat cycles of North Sea herring. Journal du Conseil. Conseil permanent inter-national pour 'exploration de la Mer, 23, 390–;8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar