Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T01:22:57.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indica and Indo-Iranica by L. D. Barnett - 2. Mânavagṛhyasûtra of the Maitrâyaṇîya Śâkhâ, with the Commentary of Aṣṭâvakra. Edited with an introduction, indexes, etc., by Ramakrishna Harshaji Sastri, with a Preface by B. C. Lele M.A., (Gaekwad's Oriental Series, No. xxxv.) 9½ × 6, 9 + xxxi + 258 + vi pp. Baroda, Bhavnagar printed: Oriental Institute, 1926. - 3. Advayavajrasaṃgraha. Edited with an Introduction, by Mahamahopadhyaya Haraprasad Shastri. (Gaekwad's Oriental Series, No. xl.) 9½ × 6, xxxix + 68 pp. Baroda: Oriental Institute, 1927.

Review products

2. Mânavagṛhyasûtra of the Maitrâyaṇîya Śâkhâ, with the Commentary of Aṣṭâvakra. Edited with an introduction, indexes, etc., by Ramakrishna Harshaji Sastri, with a Preface by B. C. Lele M.A., (Gaekwad's Oriental Series, No. xxxv.) 9½ × 6, 9 + xxxi + 258 + vi pp. Baroda, Bhavnagar printed: Oriental Institute, 1926.
3. Advayavajrasaṃgraha. Edited with an Introduction, by Mahamahopadhyaya Haraprasad Shastri. (Gaekwad's Oriental Series, No. xl.) 9½ × 6, xxxix + 68 pp. Baroda: Oriental Institute, 1927.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

L. D. Barnett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notices of Books
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , April 1930 , pp. 443 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 444 note 1 I take the opportunity to record with due respect my dissent from the somewhat startling view advanced on pp. ix and xxviii that the “five Dhyāni Buddhas are the Šūnya representation of the five Skandhas”. What suggested the idea of the Dhyāni Buddhas is an obscure problem. To find any deities really like them, we have to step across the frontier of India into Iran, where we may discover something parallel in the post-Zoroastrian cult of the Fravašis.