Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:49:40.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A dung beetle that feeds on fig: implications for the measurement of species rarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. J. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9fT, UK
S. L. Sutton
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Balthasar, V. 1967. The scientific results of the Hungarian soil zoological expedition to the Brazzaville-Congo. 22. Scarabaeinae und Coprinae (Coleoptera) (131. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Scarabaeoidea). Opuscula Zoologica Budapest 7:4773.Google Scholar
Basset, Y. & Kitching, R. L. 1991. Species number, species abundance and body length of arboreal arthropods associated with an Australian rainforest tree. Ecological Entomology 16:391402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucomont, A. 1914. Les coprophages de l'archipel malais. Annales of the Entomological Society of France 83:238350.Google Scholar
Cambefort, Y. 1984. Étude écologique des coléoptères Scarabaeidae de Côte d'Ivoire. Travaux des Chercheurs de la Station de Lamto 3:1294.Google Scholar
Cambefort, Y. 1991. Dung beetles of the tropical savannas. Pp. 156178 in Hanski, I. & Cambefort, Y. (eds). Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambefort, Y. & Walter, P. 1991. Dung beetles in tropical forests in Africa. Pp. 198210 in Hanski, I. & Cambefort, Y. (eds). Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A. J. 1993. The ecology and behaviour of rainforest dung beetles in northern Borneo. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Leeds, England.Google Scholar
Estrada, A., Halffter, G., Coates-Estrada, R. & JrMeritt, D. A. 1993. Dung beetles attracted to mammalian herbivore (Alouatta palliata) and omnivore (Nasua narica) dung in the tropical rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico, Journal of Tropical Ecology 9:4554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S. & Williams, C. B. 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population, Journal of Animal Ecology 12:4258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K. 1994. Rarity. Chapman & Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. S. 1987. Species-abundance patterns. Pp. 5367 in Gee, J. H. R. & Giller, P. S. (eds). Organisation of communities: past and present. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
Halffter, G. & Matthews, E. G. 1966. The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomológica Mexicana 12–14:1312.Google Scholar
Hammond, P. M. 1990. Insect abundance and diversity in the Dumoga-Bone National Park, N. Sulawesi, with special reference to the beetle fauna of lowland rain forest in the Toraut region. Pp. 197254 in Knight, W. J. & Holloway, J. D. (eds). Insects and the rain forests of South-East Asia (Wallacea). Royal Entomological Society of London, London.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. 1983. Distributional ecology and abundance of dung and carrion-feeding beetles (Scarabaeidae) in tropical rain forests in Sarawak, Borneo. Acta Zoologica Fennica 167:145.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. 1989a. Dung beetles. Pp. 489511 in Leith, H. & Werner, J. A. (eds). Tropical rain forest ecosystems. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanski, I. 1989b. Metapopulation dynamics: does it have to be more of the same? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4:113114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanski, I. & Krikken, J. 1991. Dung beetles in tropical forests in South-East Asia. Pp. 179197 in Hanski, I. & Cambefort, Y. (eds). Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howden, H. F. & Nealis, V. G. 1975. Effects of clearing in a tropical rain forest on the composition of the coprophagous scarab beetle fauna (Coleoptera). Biotropica 7:7783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howden, H. F. & Young, O. P. 1981. Panamanian Scarabaeinae: taxonomy, distribution, and habits (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Contributions to the American Entomological Institute (Ann Arbor, Michigan) 18:1204.Google Scholar
Janzen, D. 1979. How to be a fig. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10:1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordano, P. 1983. Fig-seed predation and dispersal by birds. Biotropica 15:3841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, T. J. 1977. Natural manuring by elephants in Tsavo National Park, Kenya. D.Phil, thesis, University of Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Kinnaird, M. F., O'Brien, T. G. & Suer, Suryadi. 1996. Population fluctuations in Sulawesi red-knobbed hornbills: tracking figs in space and time. Auk 113:431440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krikken, J. 1977. Some new and otherwise noteworthy species of Onthophagus Latreille from the Indo-Australian Archipelago (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Zoologische Mededelingen 52:169184.Google Scholar
Lambert, F. 1990. Some notes on fig-eating by arboreal mammals in Malaysia. Primates 31:453458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, F. 1991. The conservation of fig-eating birds in Malaysia. Biological Conservation 58:3140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Chapman & Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M. 1975. Patterns of species abundance and diversity. Pp. 81120 in Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M. (eds). Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Moll, D. & Jansen, P. 1995. Evidence for a role in seed dispersal by two tropical herbivorous turtles. Biotropica 27:121127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, D. W. 1978. Foraging ecology and energetics of the frugivorous bat Artibeus jamaicensis. Ecology 59:716723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, D. R., Stork, N. E. & Lawton, J. H. 1988. Species number, species abundance and body length relationships of arboreal beetles in Bornean lowland rain forest trees. Ecological Entomology 13:2537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbery, D. McC, Campbell, E. J. F., Lee, Y. F., Ridsdale, C. E. & Still, M. J. 1992. Primary lowland dipterocarp forest at Danum Valley, Sabah, Malaysia: structure, relative abundance and family composition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, series B 335:341356.Google Scholar
Newbery, D. McC, Campbell, E. J. F., Proctor, J. & Still, M. J. 1996. Primary lowland dipterocarp forest at Danum Valley, Sabah, Malaysia: species composition and patterns in the understorey. Vegetatio 122:193220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez, W. 1970. Host specificity of fig wasps (Agaonidae). Evolution 24:680691.Google Scholar
Robinson, G. S. & Tuck, K. R. 1993. Diversity and faunistics of small moths (Microlepidoptera) in Bornean rainforest. Ecological Entomology 18:385393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibuya, T. & Inouchi, J. 1982. Fine structure and odor responses of olfactory sensilla of the Japanese dung beetle, Copris pecuarius (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 26:194195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, A. B. & Compton, S. G. 1992. Breakdown of pollinator specificity in an African fig tree. Biotropica 24:544549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, A. B. & Compton, S. G. 1994. Responses of fig wasps to host plant volatile cues. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20:785–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ware, A. B., Kaye, P. T., Compton, S. G. & Van Noort, S. 1993. Fig volatiles: their role in attracting pollinators and maintaining pollinator specificity. Plant Systematics and Ecology 186:147156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O. P. 1981. The attraction of neotropical Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to reptile and amphibian fecal material. Coleopterist's Bulletin 35:345348.Google Scholar