Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:42:03.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Individual Risk Attitudes on Old Wine Valuations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2019

Nikolaos Georgantzís  and
Jean-Christian Tisserand
Nikolaos Georgantzís
Affiliation:
CEREN, EA 7477, School of Wine and Spirits Business, 29 Rue Sambin, 21000Dijon, France - LEE and Department of Economics, Universitat Jaume I, Castellòn, Spain; e-mail: nikos.georgantzis@bsb-education.com.
Jean-Christian Tisserand*
Affiliation:
CEREN, EA 7477, School of Wine and Spirits Business, 29 Rue Sambin, 21000Dijon, France - Swiss Distance Learning University (UniDistance), Überlandstrasse 12, Postfach 265 CH-3900Brigue
*
e-mail: jean-christian.tisserand@bsb-education.com (corresponding author).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we report the results of an experiment designed to address the effect of risk attitudes on valuations of aged wines. We find that higher risk taking in the economic domain is associated with a significantly higher willingness to pay for an old wine. Given the increasing interest of consumers and investors in old wines, our results are applicable to the pricing of old wines and to the use of auctions as an efficient willingness to pay elicitation mechanism. (JEL Classifications: C91, D44, L66)

Keywords

auctionsrisk attitudeswine economics
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , November 2019 , pp. 417 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank the anonymous referee and those present at the presentation of this article at AAWE 2019 for their valuable comments.

References

Aka, J., Ugaglia, A. A., and Lescot, J. M. (2018). Pesticide use and risk aversion in the French wine sector. Journal of Wine Economics, 13(4), 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., and Rutström, E. E. (2006). Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experimental Economics, 9(4), 383–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attanasi, G., Georgantzís, N., Rotondi, V., and Vigani, D. (2018). Lottery-and survey-based risk attitudes linked through a multichoice elicitation task. Theory and Decision, 84(3), 341–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouri, E. I., and Roubaud, D. (2016). Fine wines and stocks from the perspective of UK investors: Hedge or safe haven? Journal of Wine Economics, 11(2), 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., and Imas, A. (2013). Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 87, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drichoutis, A., Klonaris, S., and Papoutsi, G. S. (2017). Do good things come in small packages? Bottle size effects on willingness to pay for pomegranate wine and grape wine. Journal of Wine Economics, 12(1), 84–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrielyan, G., Marsh, T. L., McCluskey, J. J., and Ross, C. F. (2018). Hoppiness is happiness? Under-fertilized hop treatments and consumers’ willingness to pay for beer. Journal of Wine Economics, 13(2), 160–181.Google Scholar
García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., and Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, A. (2012). Gender differences in ultimatum games: Despite rather than due to risk attitudes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 83(1), 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgantzís, N., and Navarro-Martínez, D. (2010). Understanding the WTA–WTP gap: Attitudes, feelings, uncertainty and personality. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(6), 895–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, R. (2019). Half-blind tasting: A deception-free method for sizing placebo and nocebo responses to price and packaging attributes. Journal of Wine Economics. doi: 10.1017/jwe.2019.40Google Scholar
Hart, J. (2018). Drink beer for science: An experiment on consumer preferences for local craft beer. Journal of Wine Economics, 13(4), 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C. A., and Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, B. (2008). Bubbles in prices of exhaustible resources. American Association of Wine Economists, Working Paper No. 32, December. Available at https://www.wine-economics.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/AAWE_WP32.pdf.Google Scholar
Le Fur, E., Ameur, H. B., and Faye, B. (2016). Time-varying risk premiums in the framework of wine investment. Journal of Wine Economics, 11(3), 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy-Garboua, L., Maafi, H., Masclet, D., and Terracol, A. (2012). Risk aversion and framing effects. Experimental Economics, 15(1), 128–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, T., and Lusk, J. L. (2019). Mitigating choice overload: An experiment in the U.S. beer market. Journal of Wine Economics, 14(1), 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noparumpa, T., Kazaz, B., and Webster, S. (2015). Wine futures and advance selling under quality uncertainty. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 17(3), 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabater-Grande, G., and Georgantzís, N. (2002). Accounting for risk aversion in repeated prisoners' dilemma games: An experimental test. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 48(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieider, F. M., Lefebvre, M., Bouchouicha, R., Chmura, T., Hakimov, R., Krawczyk, M., and Martinsson, P. (2015). Common components of risk and uncertainty attitudes across contexts and domains: Evidence from 30 countries. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(3), 421–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, E. U., Blais, A. R., and Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar