We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
James J. DiCenso, Kant's Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 Pp. 275 ISBN 9781107009349 (hbk) US $99.00
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
07 October 2013
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Denis, L. (2005) ‘Autonomy and the Highest Good’. Kantian Review, 10, 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidovich, A. (1994) Religion as a Province of Meaning: The Kantian Foundations of Modern Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Hare, J. (1996) The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God's Assistance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Michalson, G. (1990) Fallen Freedom: Kant on Radical Evil and Moral Regeneration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternack, L. (2011) ‘The Development and Scope of Kantian Belief: The Highest Good, the Practical Postulates, and the Fact of Reason’. Kant-Studien, 102(3), 290–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. (1991) ‘Conundrums in Kant's Rational Religion’. In P. J. Rossi and M. J. Wreen (eds), Kant's Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered ( Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press), 40–53.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. (1998) ‘Is it Possible and Desirable for Theologians to Recover from Kant?, Modern Theology, 14(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar