Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:46:37.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kants Auflösung der ‘dritten Antinomie’: Zur Bedeutung des Schöpfungskonzepts für die Freiheitslehre. By Wolfgang Ertl. Symposion, 110; Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber, 1998. 280pp. ISBN 3-495-478659-8. DM 78 (hbk).

Review products

Kants Auflösung der ‘dritten Antinomie’: Zur Bedeutung des Schöpfungskonzepts für die Freiheitslehre. By Wolfgang Ertl. Symposion, 110; Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber, 1998. 280pp. ISBN 3-495-478659-8. DM 78 (hbk).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Brigitte Sassen
Brigitte Sassen
Affiliation:
McMaster University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 5 , March 2001 , pp. 132 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Erti himself acknowledges that the third antimony, if read according to the letter of the text, ‘fails in an almost grotesque manner’ (p. 160).

2 For a survey of the early criticisms see Landau, Albert, Rezensionen zur Kantischen Philosophie 1781–87 (Bebra: Albert Landau Verlag, 1991).Google Scholar A selection of these texts is available in English in Sassen, Brigitte (tr. and ed.), Kant's Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

3 This is the Göttingen or Feder/Garve review which appeared anonymously in the Zugabe zu den Göttingischen Anzeigen von gelehrten Sachen (19 Jan. 1782), 40–8. Reprinted in Kant, Immanuel, Prolegomena, ed. Vorländer, Karl (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag), 167–74Google Scholar and Landau, , Rezensionen, 10–17Google Scholar; tr, in Walker, R. C. S., The Real in the Ideal: Berkeley's Relation to Kant (New York: Garland, 1989), pp. xv–xxivGoogle Scholar, and in Sassen, , Kant's Early Critics, 53–8.Google Scholar

4 Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich, ‘On transcendental idealism’, in David Hume über den Glauben oder Idealismus und Realismus (Breslau: Löwe, 1787), 209–30.Google Scholar Reprinted in Beck, Lewis White (ed.), The Philosophy of David Hume (New York: Garland, 1983),Google Scholar tr. in Sassen, , Kant's Early Critics, pp. 139–54.Google Scholar

5 See, for instance, Johann Schultz's complaint that the Deduction is obscure in his review of Ulrich's Institutiones Logicae et Metaphysicae, Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung (13 Dec. 1785), 297–9; tr. in Sassen, , Kant's Early Critics, pp. 210–14.Google Scholar