Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T16:43:55.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language, normativity, and sexual orientation obsessive-compulsive disorder (SO-OCD): A corpus-assisted discourse analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2019

Elvis Coimbra-Gomes  and
Heiko Motschenbacher
Elvis Coimbra-Gomes*
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London, UK
Heiko Motschenbacher
Affiliation:
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
*
Address for correspondence: Elvis Coimbra-Gomes, Arts Research Centre, Linguistics Department, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UKe.coimbragomes@qmul.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents a case study of the discursive construction of sexual orientation obsessive-compulsive disorder (SO-OCD) as it surfaces in posts to an online mental health forum. SO-OCD is an anxiety disorder that involves having unwanted, intrusive thoughts as a consequence of conflict with normative sexual beliefs. The study focuses on the way normativity regulates communication about sexual identities, desires, and practices in a corpus of online posts by heterosexual men who pathologically doubt their sexual identity. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative corpus linguistic methods, we investigate how writers linguistically orient to normativity in their posts. More specifically, analyses of keywords, n-grams, and concordances are used to uncover linguistic mechanisms that play a central role in users’ orientation to normativity and in the obsessive-compulsive behaviours associated with SO-OCD. (Sexual orientation obsessive-compulsive disorder (SO-OCD), heterosexuality, masculinity, normativity, heteronormativity, critical discourse analysis, corpus linguistics)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 48 , Special Issue 4: Navigating Normativities: Gender and Sexuality in Text and Talk , September 2019 , pp. 565 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altenberg, Bengt (1998). On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word combinations. In Cowie, Anthony P. (ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications, 101–22. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th edn. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence (2018). AntConc (Version 3.5.7) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Online: http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/; accessed 31 October 2018.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul (2004). Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 32(4):346–59.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul (2013). From gay language to normative discourse: A diachronic corpus analysis of Lavender Linguistics conference abstracts 1994–2012. Journal of Language and Sexuality 2(2):179–205.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, & McEnery, Tony (eds.) (2015). Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beisswenger, Michael, & Storrer, Angelika (2008). Corpora of computer mediated communication. In Lüdeling, Anke & Kytö, Merja (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, vol. 1, 292–308. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bellés-Fortuño, Begoña, & Campoy-Cubillo, Mari Carmen (2010). ‘I sort of feel like, um, I want to, agree with that for the most part’: Reporting intuitions and ideas in spoken academic discourse. In Campoy-Cubillo, Mari Carmen, Bellés-Fortuño, Begoña, & Gea-Valor, Maria Lluïsa (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to English language teaching, 56–66. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko (2003). Crossing genders, mixing languages: The linguistic construction of transgenderism in Tonga. In Holmes, Janet & Meyerhoff, Miriam (eds.), The handbook of language and gender, 279–301. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, Cristina (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, & Conrad, Susan (1999). Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In Hasselgård, Hilde & Oksefjell, Signe (eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson, 181–90. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina (2010). Perspectives on keywords and keyness: An introduction. In Bondi, Marina & Scott, Mike (eds.), Keyness in texts, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Borba, Rodrigo, & Milani, Tommaso M. (2017). The banality of evil: Crystallised structures of cisnormativity and tactics of resistance in a Brazilian gender clinic. Journal of Language and Discrimination 1(1):7–33.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2004). Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 33(4):469–515.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (1997). Performing gender identity. Young men's talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In Johnson, Sally & Meinhof, Ulrike Hanna (eds.), Language and masculinity, 47–64. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, & Kulick, Don (2003). Language and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer (2005). Masculinity, collaborative narration and the heterosexual couple. In Thornborrow, Joanna & Coates, Jennifer (eds.), The sociolinguistics of narrative, 89–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer (2007). ‘Everyone was convinced that we were closet fags’: The role of heterosexuality in the construction of hegemonic masculinity. In Sauntson, Helen & Kyratzis, Sakis (eds.), Language, sexualities and desires: Cross-cultural perspectives, 41–67. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer (2013). The discursive production of everyday heterosexualities. Discourse & Society 24(5):536–52.Google Scholar
Duggan, Lisa (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In Castronovo, Russ & Nelson, Dana D. (eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politics, 175–94. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, Stina (2018): The language of cisnormativity: Children and parents in interaction with a multimodal app. Gender and Language 12(2):139–67.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Patricia (2015). The literary and linguistic construction of obsessive-compulsive disorder: No ordinary doubt. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas (2018). Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In Taylor, Charlotte & Marchi, Anna (eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review, 225–58. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gordon, William M. (2002). Sexual obsessions and OCD. Sexual and Relationship Therapy 17(4):343–54.Google Scholar
Grant, Jon E.; Pinto, Anthony; Gunnip, Matthew; Mancebo, Maria C.; Eisen;, Jane L. & Rasmussen, Steven A. (2006). Sexual obsessions and clinical correlates in adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Comprehensive Psychology 47:325–29.Google Scholar
Gross, Austin (2011). Glossary of sexual doubt/HOCD and the everyday lives of psychopathology. Hypocrite Reader 1. Online: http://hypocritereader.com/1/glossary-of-sexual-doubt; accessed 22 March 2017.Google Scholar
Hall, Jeffrey, & LaFrance, Betty (2012). ‘That's gay’: Sexual prejudice, gender identity, norms, and homophobic communication. Communication Quarterly 60(1):35–58.Google Scholar
Harvey, Kevin, & Koteyko, Nelya (2013). Exploring health communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael A., & Reid, Scott A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory 16(1):7–30.Google Scholar
Hunt, Daniel, & Harvey, Kevin (2015). Health communication and corpus linguistics: Using corpus tools to analyse eating disorder discourse online. In Baker, Paul & McEnery, Tony (eds.), Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora, 134–54. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jagose, Annamarie (2015). The trouble with antinormativity. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 26(1):26–47.Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika (2013). Constructing (non-)normative identities in written lesbian discourse: A diachronic study. Discourse & Society 24(5):572–89.Google Scholar
Leap, William L. (1996). Word's out: Gay men's English. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Ryan; Guzick, Andrew; Swan, Lawton; & McNamara, Joseph (2017). Stigma and recognition of different types of symptoms in OCD. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 12:64–70.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam, & Strycharz, Anna (2013). Communities of practice. In Chambers, Jack K. & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 2nd edn., 428–47. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milani, Tommaso M. (2013). Are ‘queers’ really ‘queer’? Language, identity and same-sex desire in a South African online community. Discourse & Society 24(5):615–33.Google Scholar
Milani, Tommaso M., & Levon, Erez (2016). Sexing diversity: Linguistic landscapes of homonationalism. Language & Communication 51:69–86.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko (2010). Language, gender and sexual identity: Poststructuralist perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko (2011). Taking queer linguistics further: Sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 212:149–79.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko (2012). ‘I think Houston wants a kiss right?’: Linguistic constructions of heterosexualities at Eurovision Song Contest press conferences. Journal of Language and Sexuality 1(2):127–50.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko (2014a). Focusing on normativity in language and sexuality studies: Insights from conversations on objectophilia. Critical Discourse Studies 11(1):49–70.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko (2014b). Language, normativity and power: The discursive construction of objectophilia. In Pishwa, Hanna & Schulze, Rainer (eds.), The expression of inequality in Interaction: Power, dominance, and status, 239–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko (2018a). Sexuality in critical discourse studies. In Flowerdew, John & Richardson, John E. (eds.), Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies, 388–402. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko (2018b). Corpus linguistics in language and sexuality studies: Taking stock and looking ahead. Journal of Language and Sexuality 7(2):145–74.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko (2019). Language and sexual normativity. In Barrett, Rusty & Hall, Kira (eds.), Oxford handbook of language and sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, to appear.Google Scholar
Queen, Robin M. (1997). ‘I don't speak spritch’: Locating lesbian language. In Livia, Anna & Hall, Kira (eds.), Queerly phrased: Language, gender, and sexuality, 233–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rachman, S. (1997). A cognitive theory of obsessions. Behaviour Research and Therapy 35(9):793–802.Google Scholar
Ruscio, Ayelet M.; Stein, Dan J.; Chiu, Wai-tat; & Kessler, Ronald C. (2010). The epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Molecular Psychiatry 15(1):53–63.Google Scholar
Schneider, Britta (2013). Heteronormativity and queerness in transnational heterosexual salsa communities. Discourse & Society 24(5):553–71.Google Scholar
Stein, Dan J. (1997). Psychiatry on the internet: Survey of an OCD mailing list. Psychiatric Bulletin 21:95–98.Google Scholar
Strudwick, Patrick (2015). ‘World's leading anxiety expert’ offers treatment for people who worry that they're gay. Buzzfeednews.com. Online: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/patrickstrudwick/worlds-leading-anxiety-expert-offers-treatment-for-people-wh; accessed 23 August 2018Google Scholar
Suler, John (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior 7(3):321–25.Google Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn, & Wilson, Elizabeth A. (2015). Introduction: Antinormativity's queer conventions. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 26(1):1–25.Google Scholar
Williams, Monnica T. (2008). Homosexuality anxiety: A misunderstood form of OCD. In Sebeki, Lennard V. (ed.), Leading-edge health education issues, 195–205. New York: Nova Biomedical Books.Google Scholar
Williams, Monnica T., & Farris, Samantha G. (2011). Sexual orientation obsessions in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Prevalence and correlates. Psychiatry Research 187(1–2):156–59.Google Scholar
Williams, Monnica T.; Slimowicz;, Joseph; Tellawi, Ghazel; & Wetterneck, Chad (2014). Sexual orientation symptoms in obsessive compulsive disorder: Assessment and treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy. Directions in Psychiatry 34(1):37–54.Google Scholar