Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:46:28.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A sketch of the linguistic situation in Israel today*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

David L. Gold
David L. Gold
Affiliation:
Department of Hebrew Language, University of Haifa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The results of the reintroduction and renativization of Hebrew are highlighted, and some commonly made assumptions about Hebrew and its place in Israeli life examined. The main topics are (a) the debatable equation of an ideal nation-state with a single and exclusive language, (b) the long history of Hebrew as a component of Jewish multilingualism, (c) the Hebraist movement, (d) the extent of its success and its advantages and disadvantages, (e) linguistic rights in Israel. (Language revitalization, language and nationalism, language policy and planning)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 1989 , pp. 361 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alberg, R. (1980, 06). Du “Artefaritaj Lingvoj.” Israela Esperantisto 72: 1–4.Google Scholar
Blanc, H. (1964). Israeli Hebrew texts. In Studies in Egyptology and linguistics in honour of H. J. Polotsky. Jerusalem: The Israel Exploration Society. 132–52.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1939). Linguistic aspects of science. Offprinted from International encyclopedia of unified sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, separately paginated.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. L. (1985). Language and social stratification among the Jewish population of Israel. In Fishman, J. A. (ed.), Readings in the sociology of Jewish languages. Leiden: Brill. 65–81 (Reviewed in Gold 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eban, A. (1968). My people: The story of the Jews. New York: Behrman House.Google Scholar
Garvin, P. (1959). The standard language problem: Concepts and methods. Anthropological Linguistics, 1: 28–31.Google Scholar
Gold, D. L. (1976). [Review of Grimes 1974. ] Babel 22: 41–42.Google Scholar
Gold, D. L. (1981a). An introduction to English in Israel. Language Problems & Language Planning 5(1): 11–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, D. L. (1981b). Recent American studies in Jewish languages (Review-Essay). Jewish Language Review 1: 11–88.Google Scholar
Gold, D. L. (1982a). [Review of J. Ornstein's “Patterns of language planning in the new states. “] Jewish Language Review 2: 141–42.Google Scholar
Gold, D. L. (1982b). [Review of Wood 1979, and Wood 1981. ] Jewish Language Review 2: 174–82.Google Scholar
Gold, D. L. (1983c). [Review of M. Piamenta's “Jerusalem Arabic lexicon. “] Jewish Language Review 3: 265–67.Google Scholar
Gold, D. L. (1983d). [Review of P. S. Raya's Language standardization: Studies in prescriptive linguistics.] Jewish Language Review 3: 271–74.Google Scholar
Gold, D. L. (1987). Recent studies in Jewish languages (Review article). Language in Society 16: 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, D. L. (1989). Towards a study of spatial variation in latter-day Israeli Hebrew. Jewish Linguistic Societies. 89–103.Google Scholar
Gold, D. L. (ms.). The influence of Judezmo on Israeli Hebrew.Google Scholar
Gold, D. L., & Prager, L. (1984). [Review of L. M. Davis, English dialectology: An introduction (University: The University of Alabama Press, 1983).] Jewish Language Review 4: 214–15.Google Scholar
Grimes, B. F. (1974). Ethnologue. 8th ed.Huntington Beach: Wycliffe Bible Translators.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1969). [Review of V. Tauli, Introduction to a theory of language planning (Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiskell, 1968). Language 45(4): 939–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E. (1972). Dialect, language, nation. In Pride, J. B. & Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 97–111. (Reprinted from American Anthropologist 68, 1966, 91–35)Google Scholar
Israeli Arabs lag in school, study says. (1981, 11 22). The New York Times. 11.Google Scholar
Klein-Francke, F. (1987, 12 24). Wer Jude und wer Araber ist. Rheinische Merkur, p. 6.Google Scholar
Kochman, T. (1973). [Review of C. Mitchell-Kernan, Language behavior in a Black urban community.] Language 49(4): 967–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moerman, M. (1966). Ethnic identification in a complex civilization: Who are the Lue? American Anthropologist 67: 1215–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penzl, H. (1980). [Review of G. Burckhard (ed.), Die deutsche rechtschreibung und ihre reform, 1722–1974 (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1974).] Language 56(2): 467–68.Google Scholar
Penzl, H. (1981). [Review of W. Mentrup (ed.), Materialien zur historischen entwicklung der grossund kleinschreibungsregeln (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1980).] Language 57(1): 230–31.Google Scholar
Pilovski, A.-L. (1977). Die polemik arum dem plan tsu shafn in 1927 a katedre far yidish in rishelayim. Di Goldene Keyt 93: 181–222.Google Scholar
Rabin, C. & Fischler, B.-Z. (eds.) (1980). Studies in Hebrew and the teaching of Hebrew. Jerusalem: Council on the Teaching of Hebrew.Google Scholar
Reif, J. A. (1980, 05 16). Language difficulties (Review of Rabin & Fischler 1980). Jerusalem Post, p. 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, M. (1973). Geshikhte Fun Der Yidisher Shprakh. 4 vols. New York: YIVO Institute for Jewish Research.Google Scholar
Wood, R. E. (1979). A voluntary, non-ethnic, non-territorial speech community. In Mackey, W. F. & Ornstein, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistic studies in language contact: Methods and cases. The Hague: Mouton [= W. Winter (ed.), Trends in linguistics: Studies and monographs, 6].Google Scholar
Wood, R. E. (1981). Current work in the linguistics of Esperanto. Geolinguistics 7: 81–125.Google Scholar