Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:58:37.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transnationalism as interdiscursivity: Korean managers of multinational corporations talking about mobility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2017

Joseph Sung-Yul Park
Joseph Sung-Yul Park*
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
*
Address for correspondence: Joseph Sung-Yul Park, English Language and Literature, National University of Singapore, AS5, 7 Arts Link, Singapore117570, ellpjs@nus.edu.sg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores how transnationalism can be understood as an interdiscursive process. By making connections with chronotopes of past places along a transmigrant's trajectory, interdiscursivity allows for the emergence of complex indexical meaning associated with different speakers and different ways of speaking, imbuing the transmigrant's mobility with specific social significance. This article demonstrates this point through an analysis of how South Korean mid-level managers of multinational corporations in Singapore imagined their positioning in the global workplace. By tracing the ways the managers employed metapragmatic discourse associated with multiple chronotopes to make sense of their reasonably successful but limited careers, it offers an account of how interdiscursivity shaped their understanding of their own positionality as Koreans working beyond the time-space of Korea. (Interdiscursivity, transnationalism, chronotope, Korea, English, intercultural communication)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 46 , Special Issue 1: Metapragmatics of Mobility , February 2017 , pp. 23 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

* I express my deepest gratitude to all participants in this study, without whom it would not have been possible. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2013 annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association in Chicago. I thank the audience for critical comments, and Adrienne Lo, Angela Reyes, and an anonymous reviewer for Language in Society for their constructive feedback. This work was supported by an Academy of Korean Studies Grant (AKS-2012-R-24).

References

Abelmann, Nancy; Park, So Jin; & Kim, Hyunhee (2009). College rank and neo-liberal subjectivity in South Korea: The burden of self-development. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 10(2):229–47.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif (2005). Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):38–59.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Beaverstock, Jonathan V. (2005). Transnational elites in the city: British highly-skilled inter-company transferees in New York city's financial district. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31(2):245–68.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko (2011). On the edge of the global: Modern anxieties in a Pacific island nation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2015). Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology 44(1):105–16.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan; Collins, James; & Slembrouck, Stef (2005). Polycentricity and interactional regimes in ‘global neighborhoods’. Ethnography 6(2):205–35.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh (2013). Agency and power in intercultural communication: Negotiating English in translocal spaces. Language and Intercultural Communication 13(2):202–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, James, & Slembrouck, Stef (2005). Multilingualism and diasporic populations: Spatializing practices, institutional processes, and social hierarchies. Language & Communication 25(3):189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, Hilary Parsons (2010). Imagined lives and modernist chronotopes in Mexican nonmigrant discourse. American Ethnologist 37(2):275–90.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4):453–76.Google Scholar
Eisenlohr, Patrick (2006). Little India: Diaspora, time, and ethnolinguistic belonging in Hindu Mauritius. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Glick Schiller, Nina; Basch, Linda; & Szanton Blanc, Cristina (1995). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly 68(1):48–63.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T., & Gal, Susan (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–83. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Kang, Inkyu (2014). It all started with a bang: The role of PC bangs in South Korea's cybercultures. In Kim, Kyung Hyun & Choe, Youngmin (eds.), The Korean popular culture reader, 56–75. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Koven, Michele (2013). Antiracist, modern selves and racist, unmodern others: Chronotopes of modernity in Luso-descendants’ race talk. Language & Communication 33(4):544–58.Google Scholar
Lempert, Michael, & Perrino, Sabina (2007). Entextualization and the ends of temporality. Language & Communication 27(3):205–11.Google Scholar
Lo, Adrienne; Abelmann, Nancy; Kwon;, Soo Ah & Okazaki, Sumie (eds.) (2015). South Korea's education exodus: The life and times of early study abroad. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul (2009). The local construction of a global language: Ideologies of English in South Korea. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul (2010). Images of ‘good English’ in the Korean conservative press: Three processes of interdiscursivity. Pragmatics and Society 1(2):189–208.Google Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul (2013). Metadiscursive regimes of diversity in a multinational corporation. Language in Society 42(5):557–77.Google Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul (2014). Cartographies of language: Making sense of mobility among Korean transmigrants in Singapore. Language & Communication 39:83–91.Google Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul (2015). Structures of feeling in unequal Englishes. In Tupas, Ruanni (ed.), Unequal Englishes: The politics of Englishes today, 59–73. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul, & Lo, Adrienne (2012). Transnational South Korea as a site for a sociolinguistics of globalization: Markets, timescales, neoliberalism. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(2):147–64.Google Scholar
Shin, Gi-Wook, & Nak Choi, Joon (2015). Global talent: Skilled labor as social capital in Korea. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (2005). Axes of evals: Token versus type interdiscursivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):6–22.Google Scholar
Sklair, Leslie (2001). The transnational capitalist class. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wirtz, Kristina (2013). A ‘Brutology’ of Bozal: Tracing a discourse genealogy from nineteenth-century blackface theater to twenty-first-century spirit possession in Cuba. Comparative Studies in Society and History 55(4):800–833.Google Scholar
Wortham, Stanton, & Reyes, Angela (2015). Discourse analysis beyond the speech event. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar