Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:47:10.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Institutional Change in Constrained Circumstances: Gender, Resistance, and Critical Actors in the Chilean Executive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2020

Silke Staab
Affiliation:
Silke Staab is a research specialist at UN Women. silke.staab@unwomen.org.
Georgina Waylen
Affiliation:
Georgina Waylen is a professor of politics at the University of Manchester. georgina.waylen@manchester.ac.uk.

Abstract

Because gender equality actors rarely have sufficient power to create new institutions, this article asks how they can achieve positive gender change in constrained circumstances when the creation of new rules is not possible. Building on a feminist institutionalist approach to analyzing gendered institutional dynamics, power, and resistance, we open the “black box” of one executive: Michelle Bachelet’s first presidency in Chile (2006–10). Using theory-guided process tracing and primarily qualitative data, we examine key reforms in three policy areas—health, pensions, and childcare—that were central to Bachelet’s first program. By analyzing how efforts to incorporate positive gender change fared differently in each area, this study shows how far utilizing, subverting, or converting existing rules—more “hidden” forms of change, often away from legislatures—can be effective, if limited, strategies when gender equality advocates face resistance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Authors, 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the University of Miami

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The views expressed in this article are her own and do not represent the views of UN Women, the United Nations, or any of its affiliated organizations.

Conflicts of interest: Silke Staab and Georgina Waylen declare none.

References

Aninat, Cristóbal, Londregan, John, Navia, Patricio, and Vial, Joaquín. 2008. Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes, and Policy Outcomes in Chile. In Policymaking in Latin America: How Politics Shapes Policies, ed. Stein, Ernesto and Tommasi, Mariano. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank. 155–94. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Policymaking-in-Latin-America-How-Politics-Shapes-Policies.pdf Google Scholar
Annesley, Claire, and Gains, Francesa. 2010. The Core Executive: Gender, Power, and Change. Political Studies 58, 5: 909–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arenas, Alberto, and Montecinos, Veronica. 1999. The Privatization of Social Security and Women’s Welfare: Gender Effects of the Chilean Reform. Latin American Research Review 34, 3: 737.Google Scholar
Arenas de Mesa, Alberto, Llanes, María Claudia, et al. 2006. Protección social efectiva, calidad de la cobertura, equidad y efectos distributivos del sistema de pensiones en Chile. Serie financiamiento del desarrollo no. 172. Santiago: CEPAL.Google Scholar
Bachelet, Michelle. 2005. Estoy contigo:programa de gobierno. Santiago: Gobierno de Chile.Google Scholar
Blofield, Merike. 2001. The Politics of Moral Sin: A Study of Abortion and Divorce in Catholic Chile Since 1990. Santiago: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Bonvecchi, Alejandro, and Scartascini, Carlos. 2014. The Organization of the Executive Branch in Latin America: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Latin American and Politics and Society 56, 1: 144–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borzutzky, Silvia, and Weeks, Gregory B., eds. 2010. The Bachelet Government: Conflict and Consensus in Post-Pinochet Chile. Gainsville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni. 2016. When Do Institutions Bite? Historical Institutionalism and the Politics of Institutional Change. Comparative Political Studies 49, 8: 10951127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Louise, and Waylen, Georgina. 2013. Gender and the Hidden Life of Institutions. Public Administration 91, 3: 599615.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Lena Krook, Mona. 2009. Analysing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors. Government and Opposition 44, 2: 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewig, Christina, and Kay, Stephen J.. 2011. Postretrenchment Politics: Policy Feedback in Chile’s Health and Pension Reforms. Latin American Politics and Society 53, 4: 6799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewig, Christina, and Palmucci, Gaston. 2012. Inequality and the Politics of Social Policy Implementation: Gender, Age and Chile’s 2004 Health Reforms. World Development 40, 12: 24902504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, Susan. 2006. Bachelet’s Triumph and the Political Advance of Women. Nueva Sociedad 202: 7086.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan. 2010. Explaining Domestic Violence Policy Outcomes in Chile and Argentina. Latin American Politics and Society 52, 3: 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, and Thomas, Gwynn. 2015. Resisting Parity: Gender and Cabinet Appointments in Chile and Spain. Politics and Gender 11, 4: 643–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gideon, Jasmine. 2012. Engendering the Health Agenda? The Chilean Case, 2000–2010. Social Politics 19, 3: 333–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2010. The Best Laid Plans: The Impact of Informal Rules on Formal Institutions in Transitional Regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development 45, 3; 311–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzmán, Virginia, et al. 2010. Democracy in the Country but Not in the Home? Religion, Politics and Women’s Rights in Chile. Third World Quarterly 31, 6: 971–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Liesl. 2010. Feminist Policymaking in Chile. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Liesl, and Blofield, Merike. 2013. Political Reform and Gender Equality. In Sehnbruch and Siavelis 2013. 119–42.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., Paul, Pierson, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2015. Drift and Conversion: Hidden Faces of Institutional Change. In Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis, ed. Mahoney, James and Thelen. New York: Cambridge University Press. 180208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Levitsky, Steven. 2004. Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics 2, 4: 725–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Laurel Weldon, S.. 2018. The Logics of Gender Justice: State Action on Women’s Rights Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalalzai, Farida. 2013. Shattered, Cracked, or Firmly Intact? Women and the Executive Glass Ceiling Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jalalzai, Farida. 2016. Women Presidents of Latin America: Beyond Family Ties? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Junta Nacional de Jardines Infantiles (JUNJI). 2012a. Respuesta a solicitud de acceso no. 4647 (SAIP). Santiago: JUNJI.Google Scholar
Junta Nacional de Jardines Infantiles (JUNJI). 2012b. Respuesta a solicitud de acceso mo. 4990 (SAIP). Santiago: JUNJI.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and Mackay, Fiona, eds. 2011. Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, Fiona, Kenny, Meryl, and Chappell, Louise. 2010. New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism? International Political Science Review 31, 5: 573–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, ed. Mahoney and Thelen. Cambridge University Press. 137.Google Scholar
Maira, Gloria. 2010. El pildorazo: Michelle Bachelet, nosotras y la defensa de la anticoncepción de emergencia. In Y votamos por ella. Michelle Bachelet: miradas feministas, ed. Burotto, Alessandra and Torres, Carmen. Santiago: Heinrich Boell Stiftung/Fundación Instituto de la Mujer. 115–40.Google Scholar
Martínez-Gallardo, Cecilia. 2010. Inside the Cabinet: The Influence of Ministers in the Policymaking Process. In How Democracy Works: Political Institutions, Actors, and Arenas in Latin American Policymaking, ed. Scartascini, Carlos, Stein, Ernesto, and Tommasi, Mariano. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank. 129–46. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/How-Democracy-Works-Political-Institutions-Actors-and-Arenas-in-Latin-American-Policymaking.pdf Google Scholar
Matamala, María Isabel. 2010. A medio camino en un entrevero: ¿quedó desnuda la igualdad de género? In Y votamos por ella. Michelle Bachelet: miradas feministas, ed. Burotto, Alessandra and Torres, Carmen. Santiago: Heinrich Boell Stiftung/Fundación Instituto de la Mujer. 141–68.Google Scholar
Matamala, María Isabel, et al. 2005. Género: desiguales, en salud y enfermedad. In Determinantes sociales de la salud en Chile, ed. Iniciativa Chilena de Equidad en Salud. Santiago: ICES. 4348.Google Scholar
Mesa-Lago, Carmelo. 2009. Efectos de la crisis global sobre la seguridad social de salud y pensiones en América Latina y el Caribe y recomendaciones de políticas. Santiago: ECLAC.Google Scholar
Ministerio, de Planificación (Mideplan). 2010. Cuatro años creciendo juntos: memoria de la instalación del Sistema de Protección Integral a la Infancia Chile Crece Contigo 2006–2010. Santiago: Mideplan.Google Scholar
Montecinos, Veronica, ed. 2017. Women Presidents and Prime Ministers in Post-Transition Democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS). 2007. Equidad de género en la reforma del sector salud: lecciones del proceso chileno. Santiago: OPS.Google Scholar
Podestà, Andrea. 2007. La dimensión de género en la reforma del sistema de pensiones chileno. Master’s thesis. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.Google Scholar
Pribble, Jennifer. 2014. Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD). 2010. Desarrollo humano en Chile: género: los desafíos de la igualdad. Santiago: PNUD.Google Scholar
Reyes-Housholder, Catherine. 2019. A Constituency Theory for the Conditional Impact of Female Presidents. Comparative Politics 51, 3: 429–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes-Housholder, Catherine, and Thomas, Gwynn. 2018. Latin America’s Presidentas: Overcoming Challenges, Forging New Pathways. In Gender and Representation in Latin America, ed. Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie. New York: Oxford University Press. 1938.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W., and Dunleavy, Patrick. 1995. Prime Minister, Cabinet and Core Executive. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ríos Tobar, Marcela. 2009. Feminist Politics in Contemporary Chile: From the Democratic Transition to Bachelet. In Feminist Agendas and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Jane, S. Jaquette. Durham: Duke University Press. 2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie, and Reyes-Housholder, Catherine. 2017. Gender and Institutions in Post-Transition Executives. In Montecinos 2017. 8199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sehnbruch, Kirsten, and Siavelis, Peter, eds. 2013. Democratic Chile: The Politics and Policies of a Historic Coalition, 1990–2010. Boulder: Lynn Rienner.Google Scholar
Sepúlveda-Zelaya, Carmen. 2016. Formal and Informal Institutional Challenges to Women’s Reproductive Rights: Emergency Contraception and the Constitutional Tribunal in Chile. In Waylen 2016b. 171–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Servicio Nacional de la Mujer (SERNAM). 2007. Agenda de género 2006–2010. Santiago: SERNAM.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2000. The President and Congress in Postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2002. Exaggerated Presidentialism and Moderate Presidents: Executive-Legislative Relations in Chile. In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito. New York: Cambridge University Press. 79114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2006. Accommodating Informal Institutions and Democracy in Chile. In Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America, ed. Helmke, Gretchen and Levitsky, Steven. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 3355.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter, and Sehnbruch, Kirsten. 2009. The Bachelet Administration: The Normalization of Politics? CLAS Working Paper no. 28. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Staab, Silke. 2017. Gender and the Politics of Gradual Change: Social Policy Reforms and Innovations in Chile. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Linda.S. 2012. The Bachelet Effect on Gender-Equity Policies. Latin American Perspectives 39, 4: 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Gwynn. 2016. Promoting Gender Equality: Michelle Bachelet and Formal and Informal Institutional Change Within the Chilean Presidency. In Waylen 2016b. 95120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Kellee. 2006. Adaptive Informal Institutions and Endogenous Institutional Change in China. World Politics 59, 1: 116–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés, Teresa, ed. 2009. ¿Género en el poder? El Chile de Michelle Bachelet. Santiago: CEDEM.Google Scholar
Vargas, Virginia. and Wieringa, Saska. 1998. The Triangle of Empowerment: Processes and Actors in the Making of Public Policy for Women. In Women’s Movements and Public Policy in Europe, Latin America, and the Caribbean, ed. Geertje Lycklama à Nijeholt, Vargas, and Wieringa. New York: Garland Publishing. 323.Google Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2016a. Comparing Michelle Bachelet’s Two Presidencies: Continuity or Change? In Waylen 2016b. 197223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgina, Waylen, ed. 2016b. Gender, Institutions, and Change in Bachelet’s Chile. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Georgina, Waylen, ed. 2016b. 2017. Gender and Informal Institutions. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Yáñez, Sonia. 2010. La dimensión de género en la reforma previsional chilena (Ley No 20.255 de reforma de pensiones). Santiago: ECLAC.Google Scholar