Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T06:36:18.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resilience and Renewal: The Enforcement of Labor Laws in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Salo Coslovsky ,
Roberto Pires  and
Renato Bignami
Salo Coslovsky
Affiliation:
New York University. salo.coslovsky@nyu.edu
Roberto Pires
Affiliation:
Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada in Brasília. roberto.pires@ipea.gov.br
Renato Bignami
Affiliation:
Ministério do Trabalho, Superintendência Regional do Trabalho in São Paulo. renato.bignami@mte.gov.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What happens to a country's system of labor laws when its government embraces market-oriented reforms? In a twist on the prediction that labor regulations will be repealed, researchers find that laws remain in place but are not faithfully enforced, a phenomenon known as de facto flexibility. This article examines the case of Brazil to understand its near-opposite; namely, resilience and renewal in the enforcement of labor regulations. It finds that labor unions have combined the corporatist authority they gained under state control with the autonomy they acquired under democratization to devise new modes of action and to safeguard existing regulations. Meanwhile, labor inspectors and prosecutors rely on existing laws to combat precarious work conditions and promote formal employment relations, which strengthen the unions. This mutually supportive arrangement is neither perfect nor free of tension, but it shows how workers can be protected even when employers are subjected to global competition.

Type
Research
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , Summer 2017 , pp. 77 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amengual, Matthew. 2013. Pathways to Enforcement: Labor Inspectors Leveraging Linkages with Society in Argentina. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 67 1: 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amengual, Matthew. 2016. Politicized Enforcement in Argentina: Labor and Environmental Regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anner, Mark. 2008. Meeting the Challenges of Industrial Restructuring: Labor Reform and Enforcement in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society 50 2 (Summer): 33–65.Google Scholar
Anner, Mark. 2011a. The Impact of International Outsourcing on Unionization and Wages: Evidence from the Apparel Export Sector in Central America. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 64 2: 305–22.Google Scholar
Anner, Mark. 2011b. Solidarity Transformed: Labor Responses to Globalization and Crisis in Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Patricia. 2006. Brasil serve de exemplo no combate ao trabalho escravo. Consultor Jurídico, December 19. www.conjur.com.br/2006-dez19/brasil_serve_exemplo_combate_trabalho_escravo Google Scholar
Audi, Patricia. 2008. A Organização Internacional do Trabalho e o combate ao trabalho escravo no Brasil. In Trabalho escravo contemporâneo no Brasil: contribuições críticas para sua análise e denúncia, ed. Cavalcante de Cerqueira, Gelba, Rezende Figueira, Ricardo, Antunes Prado, Adonia, and Maria Leite Costa, Célia. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Bensusán, Graciela. 2006. Diseno legal y desempeño real: instituciones laborales en América Latina. Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.Google Scholar
Berg, Janine. 2010. Laws or Luck? Understanding Rising Formality in Brazil in the 2000s. Decent Work in Brazil series, Working paper 5. Brasília: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
Berliner, Daniel, Greenleaf, Anne, Lake, Milli, and Noveck, Jennifer. 2015. Building Capacity, Building Rights? State Capacity and Labor Rights in Developing Countries. World Development 72: 127–39.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Adalberto. 2014. Os sindicatos no Brasil. Nota técnica 56, February. Brasília: IPEA. 21–27.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Adalberto, and Gindin, J.. 2009. Industrial Relations and Collective Bargaining: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico Compared. Working paper 5. Industrial and Employment Relations Department (DIALOGUE). Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Adalberto, and Lage, Telma. 2005. A inspeção do trabalho no Brasil. DADOS 48 3: 451–90.Google Scholar
Celso, Cardoso, José, and Hamasaki, Claudia. 2014. Padrões de desenvolvimento, mercado de trabalho e proteção social: a experiěncia brasileira entre as décadas liberal (1990) e desenvolvimentista (2000). Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Collingsworth, Terry, William Gould, J., and Harvey, Pharis J.. 1994. Time for a Global New Deal. Foreign Affairs 73 1: 8–13.Google Scholar
Cook, María Lorena. 1998. Toward Flexible Industrial Relations? Neoliberalism, Democracy, and Labor Reform in Latin America. Industrial Relations 37 3: 311–36.Google Scholar
Cook, María Lorena. 2002. Labor Reform and Dual Transitions in Brazil and the Southern Cone. Latin American Politics and Society 44 1 (Spring): 1–34.Google Scholar
Cook, María Lorena. 2007. The Politics of Labor Reform in Latin America: Between Flexibility and Rights. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Coslovsky, Salo. 2011. Relational Regulation in the Brazilian Ministério Público: the Organizational Basis of Regulatory Responsiveness. Regulation and Governance 5 1: 70–89.Google Scholar
Coslovsky, Salo. 2013. Flying under the Radar? the State and the Enforcement of Labor Laws in Brazil. Oxford Development Studies 42 2: 190–216.Google Scholar
Coslovsky, Salo. 2015. Beyond Bureaucracy: How Prosecutors and Public Defenders Enforce Urban Planning Laws in São Paulo, Brazil. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 6: 1103–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coslovsky, Salo, and Locke, Richard. 2013. Parallel Paths to Enforcement: Private Compliance, Public Regulation, and Labor Standards in the Brazilian Sugar Sector. Politics and Society 41 4: 496–525.Google Scholar
Coslovsky, Salo, Pires, Roberto, and Silbey, Susan. 2011. The Pragmatic Politics of Regulatory Enforcement. In Handbook on the Politics of Regulation, ed. Levi-Faur, D.. London: Edward Elgar. 322–34.Google Scholar
Daimler, Ag. 2015. Annual Report. https://www.daimler.com/documents/investors/berichte/geschaeftsberichte/daimler/daimler-ar2015-supervisoryboardmembershipsdirectorships-2015.pdf Google Scholar
Dal Rosso, Sadi. 1999. A inspeção do trabalho: opinião pública, perfil dos agentes, tenděncias internacionais. Brasília: SINAIT.Google Scholar
Davies, Ronald, and Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya. 2013. A Race to the Bottom in Labour Standards? an Empirical Investigation. Journal of Development Economics 103: 1–14.Google Scholar
Maria, Doimo, Ana. 1995. A vez e a voz do popular: movimentos sociais e participação política no Brasil pós-70. Rio de Janeiro: Relume-Dumará.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter 2010. Is It Labor's Turn to Globalize? Twenty-first Century Opportunities and Strategic Responses. Global Labour Journal 1 3: 352–79.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter 2014. National Labor Movements and Transnational Connections: Global Labor's Evolving Architecture Under Neoliberalism. Working paper 116–14. Berkeley: Institute for Research on Labor and Employment.Google Scholar
Fundo de Garantia do Tempo de Serviço (FGTS). 2013. Demonstrações contábeis do Fundo de Garantia do Tempo de Serviço. http://downloads.caixa.gov.br/_arquivos/fgts/demonstracao_financeira_fgts/DEMONSTRACAO_FINANCEIRA_FGTS_2012.pdf Google Scholar
William, Gray, Chad. 2009. Metalúrgicos sem Fronteras: Building a Global Union at Gerdau. Master's thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Greenhill, Brian, Mosley, Layna, and Prakash, Aseem. 2009. Trade-based Diffusion of Labor Rights: a Panel Study, 1986–2002. American Political Science Review 103 4: 669–90.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie. 2009. Forced to Be Good: Why Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Michael. 2008. The Labor Policies of the Lula Government. In Brazil Under Lula: Economy, Politics, and Society Under the Worker-President, ed. Love, Joseph and Baer, Werner. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Montero, Alfred P.. 2013. The Renewed Developmental State: the National Development Bank and the Brazil Model. Journal of Development Studies 49 11: 1484–99.Google Scholar
Holland, Alisha C. 2016. Forbearance. American Political Science Review 110 2: 232–46.Google Scholar
ILOStat. 2012. Trade union density rates and collective bargaining coverage rates. https://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/wcnav_defaultSelection?_adf.ctrl-state=ym3q4j1jv_129&_afrLoop=526845810713177&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=ym3q4j1jv_155#!. Accessed March 17, 2017.Google Scholar
Instituto de Pesquisa Econ&mica Aplicada (IPEA). 2010. Instituições participativas e políticas públicas no Brasil: características e evolução nas últimas duas décadas. In Brasil em desenvolvimento: estado, planejamento e políticas públicas. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
International Labor Organization (ILO). 2007. International Framework Agreements: a Global Tool for Supporting Rights at Work. http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_080723/lang---en/index.htm Google Scholar
Kanbur, Ravi, and Ronconi, Lucas. 2016. Enforcement Matters: The Effective Regulation of Labor. CEPR Discussion Paper DP11098. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=11098 Google Scholar
Kapstein, Ethan. 1996. Workers and the World Economy. Foreign Affairs 75 3: 16–24.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. 1992. The Workers' Party and Democratization in Brazil. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lambertucci, Antonio. 2010. Mesa nacional de diálogo para aperfeiçoar as condições de trabalho na cana de açúcar: um espaço de participação. Monograph. Programa de Formação de Conselheiros Nacionais, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
Madrid, Raul. 2003. Labouring against Neoliberalism. Journal of Latin American Studies 35 1: 53–88.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, ed. Mahoney, and Thelen, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–37.Google Scholar
Martins, Sérgio. 2000. Participação nos lucros ou resultados: oportunidade ou desafio para o movimento sindical? Revista de Administração Contemporânea 4 3: 47–65.Google Scholar
Mendes, Rene. 2001. Máquinas e acidentes de trabalho. Brasília: MTE/SIT/MPAS. June. www.segurancaetrabalho.com.br/download/maquinas-rene_mendes.pdf Google Scholar
Justiça, Ministério da. 2006. Diagnóstico Ministério Público do Trabalho. Brasília: Secretaria da Reforma do Judiciário.Google Scholar
Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego (MTE). 2008. Quadro comparativo da fiscalização do trabalho, 1990 a 2008. July 10. http://portal.mte.gov.br/data/files/FF8080812B35FA90012B4010BB1E4824/20F6CC70d01.pdf Google Scholar
Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego (MTE). 2012. Quadro geral das operações de fiscalização para erradicação do trabalho escravo (1995 a 2011). Brasília: SIT/SRTE.Google Scholar
Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego (MTE). 2013a. Quadro comparativo da fiscalização do trabalho, 2003 a 2013.Google Scholar
Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego (MTE). 2013b. Fiscalização saúde e segurança do trabalho. http://trabalho.gov.br/dadosabertos/estatistica-saude-e-seguranca-do-trabalho/seguranca-trabalho-1996-a-2013 Google Scholar
Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego (MTE). 2013c. Estatísticas. July 10. http://portal.mte.gov.br/geral/estatisticas.htm Google Scholar
Ministério Público do Trabalho. 2007. Mpt lança Semana Nacional de Combate às Fraudes nas Relações de Trabalho em Brasília. May 16. http://www.prt19.mpt.gov.br/informativo/2007/mai_2007/conafret.htm Google Scholar
Mosley, Layna, and Uno, Saika. 2007. Racing to the Bottom or Climbing to the Top? Economic Globalization and Collective Labor Rights. Comparative Political Studies 40 8: 923–48.Google Scholar
Victoria, Murillo, María, and Schrank, Andrew. 2005. With a Little Help from My Friends: Partisan Politics, Transnational Alliances, and Labor Rights in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 38 8: 971–99.Google Scholar
Victoria, Murillo, María, and Levitsky, Steven. 2013. Building Institutions on Weak Foundations. Journal of Democracy 24 2: 93–107.Google Scholar
Myerson, Allen. 1997. In Principle, a Case for More Sweatshops. New York Times, June 22.Google Scholar
Newland, Kathleen. 1999. Workers of the World, Now What? Foreign Policy 114: 52–65.Google Scholar
Noronha, Eduardo G. 2009. Ciclo de greves, transição política e estabilização: Brasil, 1978–2007. Lua Nova 76: 119–68.Google Scholar
OECDStat. 2017. Trade Union Density, 1999–2014. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=UN_DEN. Accessed March 17, 2017.Google Scholar
Piancastelli, Carlos. 2004. Projeto prensas. Paper presented at the 22nd ENAFIT (Encontro Nacional dos Auditores Fiscais do Trabalho). São Paulo, November 6.Google Scholar
Piore, Michael, and Schrank, Andrew. 2008. Toward Managed Flexibility: the Revival of Labour Inspection in the Latin World. International Labour Review 147 1: 1–23.Google Scholar
Pires, Roberto. 2008. Promoting Sustainable Compliance: Styles of Labour Inspection and Compliance Outcomes in Brazil. International Labour Review 147, 2–3: 199–229.Google Scholar
Pires, Roberto. 2011. Beyond the Fear of Discretion: Flexibility, Performance, Accountability in the Management of Regulatory Bureaucracies. Regulation and Governance 5 1: 43–69.Google Scholar
Pires, Roberto. 2013. The Organizational Basis of Rewarding Regulation: Contingency, Flexibility, and Accountability in the Brazilian Labor Inspectorate. Politics and Society 41 4: 621–46.Google Scholar
Pires, Roberto, and Vaz, Alexander. 2014. Para além da participação: interfaces socioestatais no governo federal. Lua Nova 93: 13–43.Google Scholar
Rombaldi, Maurício. 2012. Internacionalização do sindicalismo no Brasil: um estudo sobre os setores metalúrgico e de telecomunicações. Ph.D. diss., University of São Paulo.Google Scholar
Ronconi, Lucas. 2012. Globalization, Domestic Institutions, and Enforcement of Labor Law: Evidence from Latin America. Industrial Relations 51 1: 89–105.Google Scholar
Rosati, Furio C. 2011. Understanding the Brazilian Success in Reducing Child Labour: Empirical Evidence and Policy Lessons. International Labour Organization, June 20. http://www.ucw-project.org/attachment/Brazil_20june1120110622_103357.pdf Google Scholar
Seidman, Gay W. 1994. Manufacturing Militance: Workers' Movements in Brazil and South Africa, 1970–1985. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, Barbara. 2010. Globalization and Labor in Four Developing Regions: an Institutional Approach. Studies in Comparative International Development 45 2: 127–50.Google Scholar
Taylor, Matthew. 2015. The Unchanging Core of Brazilian State Capitalism, 1985–2015. School of International Service Research Paper 2015–8. Washington, DC: American University.Google Scholar
Tonelson, Alan. 2000. The Race to the Bottom: Why a Worldwide Worker Surplus and Uncontrolled Free Trade Are Sinking American Living Standards. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Weil, David. 2010. Improving Work Place Conditions Through Strategic Management: A Report to the Wage and Hour Division. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Weil, David. 2011. Enforcing Labor Standards in Fissured Workplaces: the U.S. Experience. Economic and Labour Relations Review 22 2: 33–54.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2013. World Development Indicators: Distribution of Income or Consumption. wdi.worldbank.org/table/2.9# Google Scholar
World Bank. n.d. Privatization database. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/privatization-database. Accessed March 17, 2017.Google Scholar