Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:00:35.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethnogenesis, Ethnicity, and “Cultural Refusal”: The Case of the Salasacas in Highland Ecuador

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Rachel Corr  and
Karen Vieira Powers
Rachel Corr
Affiliation:
Florida Atlantic University
Karen Vieira Powers
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Salasacas are one of several indigenous peoples in highland Ecuador who consider themselves, and are considered by others, to be a distinct, homogeneous blood group. Throughout the Incaic, Spanish, and national periods, we trace their ethnogenesis from diverse origins to a single, highly unified ethnic community. Using an interdisciplinary methodology that combines historical and ethnographic data and follows the movement of current Salasaca anthroponyms, we identify three seventeenth-century migrations of different groups to Salasaca. These groups were still separate in the eighteenth century, and we follow their fusion into a single, exclusive, and vocal ethnic group in the postindependence period. We focus careful attention on their often novel responses to multiple historical contingencies over the course of five hundred years. Departing from writers who emphasize the political nature of ethnicity, we argue that Salasaca became a zone of cultural refusal as indigenous actors made a conscious decision to maintain a specific indigenous cultural identity.

Resumen

Resumen

Los salasacas son uno de varios grupos indígenas de la sierra ecuatoriana, que se consideran y son considerados un grupo distinto de sangre homogénea. En este artículo trazamos la etnogénesis salasaca a través de los periodos de dominación incaica, española y nacional, como un pueblo con diversos orígenes que se gestaron en una comunidad étnica unificada. Para ello, utilizando una metodología interdisciplinaria que combina datos históricos y etnográficos, y siguiendo el movimiento de los antropónimos de la comunidad Salasaca actual, identificamos que en siglo XVII hubo migraciones de tres diferentes grupos a Salasaca. Aunque aún separados en el siglo XVIII, nuestro análisis nos permitió trazar cómo estos grupos se fusionaron en un grupo étnico único, exclusivo e independiente durante el periodo posterior a la independencia. Nuestra atención se centra cuidadosamente en las frecuentes y novedosas formas en que la comunidad Salasaca ha reaccionado a través de quinientos años a múltiples contingencias históricas. A diferencia de investigadores que enfatizan la naturaleza política de la etnicidad, nosotros postulamos que Salasaca se convirtió en una zona de rechazo cultural, en la que actores indígenas decidieron conscientemente mantener una identidad cultural indígena específica.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 47 , Issue S1: Special Issue , 2012 , pp. 5 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

We would like to acknowledge Frank Salomon, Deborah Truhan, and LARR's three anonymous reviewers for their incisive critiques of earlier drafts of this article. We thank the Center for Latin American Studies at University of Arizona for providing Powers with a venue for presenting our manuscript and discussing it among undergraduate and graduate students. We also thank Susan Deeds and Kevin Gosner for the advice that led to our collaboration. In Ecuador, we are indebted to both national and regional archivists, especially to Grecia Vasco de Escudero, director of the national archive, as well as to Father Fabián Areos, chancellor of the diocese of Ambato. We are also grateful to Patricio Caizabanda, Patricia Villalva, and Gladys Almeida for their assistance with ecclesiastical documents. Funding for this research was provided by intramural grants from Florida Atlantic University (Corr) and the Fulbright Commission (Powers). Last, but most important, we express our heartfelt appreciation to the people of Salasaca for their many contributions to our research.

References

Albers, Patricia 1996 “Changing Patterns of Ethnicity in the Northeastern Plains, 1780–1870.” In History, Power, and Identity: Ethnogenesis in the Americas 1492–1992, edited by Hill, Jonathan D., 90–118. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchon, Suzanne Austin 1991 Native Society and Disease in Colonial Ecuador. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andrien, Kenneth J. 1995 The Kingdom of Quito, 1690–1830: The State and Regional Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anónimo 1605 “Descripción de los pueblos de la jurisdicción del corregimiento de Villar Don Pardo en la provincial de los puruhaes.” In Relaciones histórico-geográficas de la Audiencia de Quito siglo XVI–XIX, edited by Pilar Ponce Leiva, 2:48–70. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Bawden, Garth, and Reycraft, Richard 2009 “Exploration of Punctuated Equilibrium and Culture Change in the Archaeology of Andean Ethnogenesis.” In Andean Civilization: A Tribute to Michael E. Moseley, edited by Marcus, Joyce and Williams, Patrick Ryan, 195–210. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belote, Jim, and Belote, Linda S. n.d. “From the Incas to OPEC: A Process of Andean Ethnogenesis.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Minnesota-Duluth.Google Scholar
Bilby, Kenneth 1996 “Ethnogenesis in the Guianas and Jamaica: Two Maroon Cases.” In History, Power, and Identity: Ethnogenesis in the Americas, 1492–1992, edited by Hill, Jonathan D., 119–141. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchart de Moreno, Christiana 1998 La Audiencia de Quito: Aspectos económicos y sociales. Quito: Banco Central del Ecuador.Google Scholar
Carrera Colín, Juan 1981 “Apuntes para una investigación etnohistórica de los cacicazgos del corregimiento de Latacunga, siglos XVI y XVII.” Cultura 4 (11): 129–180.Google Scholar
Cassagrande, Joseph B. 1981 “Strategies for Survival: The Indians of Highland Ecuador.” In Cultural Transformation and Ethnicity in Modern Ecuador, edited by Whitten, Norman E. Jr., 260–277. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Choque Quishpe, María Eugenia 1992 “La estructura de poder en la comunidad originaria de Salasaca.” Master's thesis, Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Ecuador.Google Scholar
Cicala, Mario (1771) 1994 Descripción histórico-topográfica de la provincia de Quito de la Compañía de Jesus. Quito: Biblioteca Ecuatoriana Aurelio Espinosa Pólit.Google Scholar
Clark, Kim A. 1998 The Redemptive Work: Railway and Nation in Ecuador, 1895–1930. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
Corr, Rachel 2010 Ritual and Remembrance in the Ecuadorian Andes. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Deeds, Susan M. 2003 Defiance and Deference in Mexico's Colonial North: Indians under Spanish Rule in Nueva Vizcaya. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLeonardis, Lisa 2011 “Itinerant Experts, Alternative Harvests: Kamayuq in the Service of Qhapaq and Crown.” Ethnohistory 58 (3): 445–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennell, Christopher C. 2007 Crossroads and Cosmologies: Diasporas and Ethnogenesis in the New World. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Guevara, Darío 1945 Puerta de El Dorado, monografía del cantón Pelileo. Quito: Editora Moderna.Google Scholar
Guevara Moposita, Luis Armando, Mata, Lilia Mariana Jiménez, and Masaquiza, Vicente Periche 1992 “Aproximaciones etimológicas y críticas en torno a la onomástica antroponómica de los Salasacas.” Tesis de investigación científica, Castellano-Literatura, Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Ecuador.Google Scholar
Hill, Jonathan D. 1996 “Introduction: Ethnogenesis in the Americas, 1492–1992.” In History, Power, and Identity: Ethnogenesis in the Americas, 1492–1992, edited by Hill, Jonathan D., 1–19. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Hirschkind, Lynn 1995 “History of the Indian Population of Cañar.” Colonial Latin American Review 4 (3): 1311–1342.Google Scholar
Hirschkind, Lynn 2005 “The Enigmatic Evanescence of Coca from Ecuador.” Ethnobotany Research and Applications 3:97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibarra, Hernán 1990 “Cambios agrarios y conflictos étnicos en la sierra central (1820–1930).” In Estructuras agrarias y conflictos sociales en la sierra central (1820–1930), edited by Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, 143–263. Quito: Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Ecuador and Consejo Nacional de Universidades y Escuelas Politécnicas: Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Ecuador and Consejo Nacional de Universidades y Escuelas Politécnicas.Google Scholar
Lockhart, James 1994 The Nahuas after the Conquest: A Social and Cultural History of the Indians of Central Mexico, Sixteenth through Eighteenth Centuries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Laura 1998 “Salasaca.” In Costume and Identity in Highland Ecuador, edited by Rowe, Anne Pollard, 126–144. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Moreno Yáñez, Segundo E. 1988 “Formaciones políticas tribales y señoríos étnicos.” In Nueva historia del Ecuador, edited by Enrique Ayala Mora, 2:11–134. Quito: Corporación Editorial Nacional, Grijalba.Google Scholar
Muñoz Bernand, Carmen 1996 “Estrategias matrimoniales apellidos y nombres de pila: Libros parroquiales y civiles en el sur del Ecuador.” In Antropología del Ecuador, edited by Yáñez, Segundo Moreno, 223–244. Quito: ABYA-YALA.Google Scholar
Navas de Pozo, Yolanda 1990 Angamarca en el siglo XVI. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Oberem, Udo 1981 “El acceso a recursos naturales de diferentes ecologías en la sierra ecuatoriana (siglo XVI).” In Contribución a la etnohistoria ecuatoriana, edited by Yánez, Segundo Moreno and Oberem, Udo, 45–71. Otavalo: Instituto Otavaleño de Antropología.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Erin 2007 Gender, Indian, Nation: The Contradictions of Making Ecuador, 1830–1925. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Ogburn, Dennis E. 2008 “Becoming Saraguro: Ethnogenesis in the Context of Inca and Spanish Colonialism.” Ethnohistory 55 (2): 287–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peñaherrera de Costales, Piedad, and Samaniego, Alfredo Costales 1959 Los Salasacas: Investigación y elaboración. Llacta 8. Quito: Instituto Ecuatoriano de Antropología y Geografía.Google Scholar
Pérez, Aquiles R. 1962 Los seudopantsaleos. Llacta 14. Quito: Instituto Ecuatoriano de Antropología y Geografía and Talleres Gráficos Nacionales.Google Scholar
Poeschel, Ursula 1988 La mujer Salasaca: Su situación en una época de reestructuración económico-cultural. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Powers, Karen 1991 “Resilient Lords and Indian Vagabonds: Wealth, Migration, and the Reproductive Transformation of Quito's Chiefdoms, 1500–1700.” Ethnohistory 38 (3): 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, Karen 1995 Andean Journeys: Migration, Ethnogenesis, and the State in Colonial Quito. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Quishpe, Jorge Marcelo 1999 Transformación y reproducción indígena en los andes septentrionales. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Reino Garcés, Pedro Arturo 2002 Tisaleo indígena en la colonia. Ambato, Ecuador: Editorial Maxtudio.Google Scholar
Rowe, Anne Pollard, ed. 1998 Costume and Identity in Highland Ecuador. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall 1985 Islands of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Saignes, Thierry 1985 Caciques, Tribute and Migration in the Southern Andes. London: University of London.Google Scholar
Salomon, Frank 1986 Native Lords of Quito in the Age of the Incas. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomon, Frank 1987 “Ancestors, Grave Robbers, and the Possible Antecedents of Cañari ‘Inca-ism.‘” In Natives and Neighbors in South America: Anthropological Essays, edited by Skar, Harald O. and Salomon, Frank, 207–232. Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg Etnografiska Museum.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Albornoz, Nicolás 1978 Indios y tributos en el Alto Perú. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Stuart B., and Salomon, Frank 1999 “New Peoples and New Kinds of People: Adaptation, Readjustment, and Ethnogenesis in South American Indigenous Societies (Colonial Era).” In The Cambridge History of Native Peoples of the Americas, edited by Frank Salomon and Stuart B. Schwartz, 3:443–501. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985 Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990 Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts of Subordinate Groups. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 2009 The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Stutzman, Ronald 1981 “El Mestizaje: An All-Inclusive Ideology of Exclusion.” In Cultural Transformations and Ethnicity in Modern Ecuador, edited by Whitten, Norman E. Jr., 45–94. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Truhan, Deborah L. 1997 “Repopulating the Countryside: Rural Forasteros in the Corregimiento de Cuenca during the Seventeenth Century.” Paper presented at the Andean Studies Committee meeting of the Conference on Latin American History, New York, January 4.Google Scholar
Whitten, Norman E. Jr. 1996 “Ethnogenesis.” In The Encyclopedia of Cultural Anthropology, edited by Levinson, David and Ember, Melvin, 407–410. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Wightman, Ann 1990 Indigenous Migration and Social Change: The Forasteros of Cuzco, 1520–1720. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wogan, Peter 2004 Magical Writing in Salasaca: Literacy and Power in Highland Ecuador. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar