Article contents
Explaining Sociopolitical Change in Latin America: The Case of Mexico
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 October 2022
Extract
Since Mexico declared its independence from Spanish rule, the country has experienced two extended periods of political stability that are atypical of Latin American societies. The first, known as the Porfiriato, extended from 1875 to 1910. The second, which was heralded by the Revolution of 1910 and consolidated in the 1920s, still holds sway in the last decade of the twentieth century. The weaknesses of the Porfiriato have been analyzed amply, thanks in great part to the hindsight provided by the revolution that ended the era. Until recently, however, most works on twentieth-century Mexico have focused on the exceptional stability of the postrevolutionary regime. This approach has left largely unresearched (Knight 1989) or merely labeled as “crises” (Needier 1987) the recurrent episodes of union insurgency, popular protest, electoral opposition, and other signs of pressure for political change that have punctuated Mexican history since the Revolution. Consequently, analysts who have recently undertaken the arduous task of diagnosing at what points this imposing edifice might “give” have been unable to benefit from insights of work carried out in previous decades.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1992 by the University of Texas Press
Footnotes
I would like to thank Diane Davis, José Antonio Aldrete, Barbara Helfferich, Robert Kaufman, LARR Editor Gilbert Merkx, and the anonymous LARR readers for their comments on earlier versions of this article.
References
- 14
- Cited by