Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:01:18.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Fertility of Maya and Ladino Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2022

John Holian*
Affiliation:
Cuyahoga Community College, Cleveland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Second only to the Quechua-speaking peoples of the Andes, the Maya of southeastern Mexico and Guatemala constitute the “most impressive surviving American culture in the Western Hemisphere” (Vogt 1969a, 21). In Mexico the main division within the Maya falls between the highland population living in the state of Chiapas and the lowland group residing in the Yucatán Peninsula (Vogt 1969b). People of mixed Spanish and Indian ancestry, known locally as ladinos, make up most of the remaining population. Inspired by the well-known series of investigations of Indian and mestizo fertility in the Andean region, the present study seeks to describe within Mexico the fertility differences between the highland and lowland Maya and their ladino neighbors and, within the limits of the data, to account for the observed differentials.

Type
Research Reports and Notes
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

The author wishes to thank Eduardo Cordero for permission to use the data, Julio Ortuzar and Arthur Conning for providing the data, Bruce Rose for computer programming, and Roger Avery, James Cramer, Gary Deimling, Gail Holian, Arthur G. Neal, Edward Stockwell, Richard Zeller, and three anonymous LARR reviewers for their comments and suggestions.

References

BRADSHAW, B. S. 1969Fertility Differences in Peru: A Reconsideration.” Population Studies 23:519.Google ScholarPubMed
BROWNER, CAROLE, AND DE MONTELLANO, BERNARD ORTIZ n.d. “Herbal Emmenagogues Used by Women in Colombia and Mexico.” In Plants Used in Indigenous Medicine: A Biocultural Approach, edited by Etkin, Nina L. New York: Redgrave Press.Google Scholar
CANCIAN, F. M. 1975 What Are Norms? A Study of Beliefs and Action in a Maya Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
COALE, A. J. 1971The Determination of Vital Rates in the Absence of Registration Data.” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 39, pt. 2:175–88.Google Scholar
COCHRANE, S. H. 1979 Fertility and Education: What Do We Really Know? World Bank Occasional Paper no. 26. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
COLBY, B. N. 1966 Ethnic Relations in the Chiapas Highlands. Santa Fe: Museum of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
COLLIER, G. A. 1975 Fields of the Tzotzil: The Ecological Bases of Tradition in Highland Chiapas. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COLLIER, J. F. 1968 Courtship and Marriage in Zinacantan, Chiapas, Mexico. New Orleans: Tulane University, Middle American Research Institute.Google Scholar
COLLINS, J. L. 1983Fertility Determinants in a High Andes Community.” Population and Development Review 9:6175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAVIDSON, M. 1977Female Work Status and Fertility in Latin America.” In The Fertility of Working Women, edited by Kupinsky, S., 342–54. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
DIRECCION GENERAL DE ESTADISTICA 1972 IX Censo General de Población, 1970: Resumen General. Mexico, D.F.: Dirección General de Estadística.Google Scholar
EARLY, J. D. 1982 Demographic Structure and Evolution of a Peasant System: Guatemala. Boca Raton: University Presses of Florida.Google Scholar
EASTERLIN, R. A. 1975The Effect of Modernization on Family Reproductive Behavior.” In The Population Debate: Dimensions and Perspectives 2:263–77. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR LATIN AMERICA 1975Population and Modernization in Latin America.” In The Population Debate: Dimensions and Perspectives 1:656–76. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
EDMONSTON, B., AND SAPOZNIKOW, J. 1976Measuring Fertility in Latin America.” Estadística 30:6878.Google Scholar
ELMENDORF, M. 1976The Dilemma of Peasant Women: A View from a Village in Yucatán.” In Women and World Development, edited by Tinker, I. and Bramsen, M. B., 8894. Washington, D.C.: Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
ELMENDORF, M. 1977Mexico: The Many Worlds of Women.” In Women: Roles and Status in Eight Countries, edited by Giele, J. Z. and Smock, A. C., 127–72. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
GLITTENBERG, J. K. 1976A Comparative Study of Fertility in Highland Guatemala: A Ladino and an Indian Town.” Ph.D. diss., University of Colorado.Google Scholar
HAINES, M. R., AVERY, R. C., AND STRONG, M. A. 1983Differentials in Infant and Child Mortality and Their Change over Time: Guatemala, 1959–1973.” Demography 20:606–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HEER, D. M. 1964Fertility Differences between Indian and Spanish-Speaking Parts of Andean Countries.” Population Studies 18:7184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HICKS, W. W. 1974Economic Development and Fertility Change in Mexico, 1950–1970.” Demography 11:407–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JAMES, W. H. 1966The Effect of Altitude on Fertility in Andean Countries.” Population Studies 20:97101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LAUGHLIN, R. M. 1969The Tzotzil.” In VOGT (ED.) 1969, 152–94.Google Scholar
MONTAGU, R. 1969The Tojolabal.” In VOGT (ED.) 1969, 226–29.Google Scholar
NASH, J. 1970 In the Eyes of the Ancestors: Belief and Behavior in a Maya Community. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
PRESS, I. 1975 Tradition and Adaptation: Life in a Modern Yucatán Village. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
REDFIELD, R. 1941 The Folk Culture of Yucatán. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
RYDER, J. W. 1976Interrelations between Family Structure and Fertility in Yucatán.” In Anthropological Studies of Human Fertility, edited by Kaplan, B. A., 93100. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
SANDERS, T. G. 1974Mexico 1974: Demographic Patterns and Population Policy.” Field Staff Reports 2, no. 1. Hanover, N.H.: American Universities Field Staff.Google Scholar
SHEDLIN, M. G., AND HOLLERBACH, P. E. 1981Modern and Traditional Fertility Regulation in a Mexican Community: The Process of Decision Making.” Studies in Family Planning 12:278–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHRYOCK, H. S., SIEGEL, J. S., AND STOCKWELL, E. G. 1976 The Methods and Materials of Demography. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
STYCOS, J. M. 1963Culture and Differential Fertility in Peru.” Population Studies 17:257–70.Google Scholar
STYCOS, J. M. 1982The Decline of Fertility in Costa Rica: Literacy, Modernization, and Family Planning.” Population Studies 36:1530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TSUI, A. O. 1982Contraceptive Availability and Family Limitation in Mexico and Rural Korea.” International Family Planning Perspectives 8:818.Google Scholar
VILLA ROJAS, A. 1969aThe Tzeltal.” In VOGT (ED.) 1969, 195225.Google Scholar
VILLA ROJAS, A. 1969bThe Maya of Yucatán.” In VOGT (ED.) 1969, 244–97.Google Scholar
VOGT, E. A. 1969aThe Maya: Introduction.” In VOGT (ED.) 1969, 2129.Google Scholar
VOGT, E. A. 1969bIntroduction.” In VOGT (ED.) 1969, 317.Google Scholar
VOGT, E. A. 1969cChiapas Highlands.” In VOGT (ED.) 1969, 133–51.Google Scholar
VOGT, E. A. 1970 The Zinacantecos of Mexico: A. Modern Maya Way of Life. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
VOGT, E. A. 1978 Bibliography of the Harvard Chiapas Project, 1957–1977. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
VOGT, E. A., ED. 1969 Ethnology. Vol. 7 of The Handbook of Middle American Indians. Edited by Wauchope, R. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
WEBBER, I. L. 1980Social Organization and Change in Modern Yucatán.” In Yucatán: A World Apart, edited by Moseley, E. H. and Terry, E. D., 172201. University: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
WHITEHEAD, L. 1968Altitude, Fertility, and Mortality in Andean Countries.” Population Studies 22:335–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed