Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:17:55.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Human Rights to Citizenship Rights?: Recent Trends in the Study of Latin American Social Movements

Review products

SEARCHING FOR LIFE: THE GRANDMOTHERS OF THE PLAZA DE MAYO AND THE DISAPPEARED CHILDREN OF ARGENTINA. By ArdittiRita. (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1999. Pp. 235. $45.00 cloth, $17.95 paper.)

TAKING ON GOLIATH: THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW LEFT PARTY AND THE STRUGGLE FOR DEMOCRACY IN MEXICO. By BruhnKathleen. (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997. Pp. 365. $55.00 cloth, $22.50 paper.)

SUBNATIONAL POLITICS AND DEMOCRATIZATION IN MEXICO. Edited by CorneliusWayne A., EisenstadtTodd A., and HindleyJane. (La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego, 1999. Pp. 365. $21.95 paper.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2022

Philip Oxhorn*
Affiliation:
McGill University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essays
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Rachel Brickner for her comments on an earlier draft of this essay.

References

AgÜEro, Felipe, and Stark, Jeffrey, EDS. 1998 Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America. Miami, Fla.: North-South Center Press, University of Miami.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Douglas, Vilas, Carlos, Hite, Katherine, Martin, Scott, Piester, Kerianne, and Segarra, Monique, EDS. 1997 The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean 1985Strategy or Identity: New Theoretical Paradigms and Contemporary Social Movements.” Social Research 52, no. 4 (Winter):663716.Google Scholar
Davis, Diane 1999The Power of Distance: Re-Theorizing Social Movements in Latin America.” Theory and Society 28, no. 4: 585638.Google Scholar
Foweraker, Joe, and Landman, Todd 1997 Citizenship Rights and Social Movements: A Comparative and Statistical Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry 1990Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 23 (Oct.):121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo 1994Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5 (Jan.):5669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo 1996Illusions about Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 7 (Apr.):3451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe 1986 Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Oxhorn, Philip 1995 Organizing Civil Society: The Popular Sectors and the Struggle for Democracy in Chile. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Oxhorn, Philip n.d. “Social Inequality, Civil Society, and the Limits of Citizenship in Latin America.” In The Politics of Injustice in Latin America, edited by Susan Eckstein and Timothy Wickham-Crawley, Universityof California Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Oxhorn, Philip, and Ducatenzeiler, Graciela, EDS. 1998 What Kind of Democracy? What Kind of Market? Latin America in the Age of Neoliberalism. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth 1995Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case.” World Politics 48 (Oct.):82116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth 1997Beyond Romanticism: Social Movements and the Study of Political Change in Latin America.” LARR 32, no. 2: 137–51.Google Scholar
Schneider, Cathy 1995 Shantytown Protest in Pinochet's Chile. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles 1996 “Citizenship, Identity, and Social History.” In Citizenship, Identity, and Social History, edited by Charles Tilly, 1–17. International Review of Social History, supplement no. 3. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.Google Scholar