Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:04:40.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equal Rights vs. Special Rights: Rights Discourses, Framing, and Lesbian and Gay Antidiscrimination Policy in Washington State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Erin M. Adam  and
Betsy L. Cooper
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study argues that rights discourse influences heterosexual public opinion in Washington State. We tested this through a survey experiment conducted in the 2011 Washington Poll. We broke interviewees into three groups, with each group exposed to a different frame: a pro–lesbian and gay equal rights frame, an anti–lesbian and gay special rights frame, and a control or no frame. Immediately following the treatment, we asked interviewees if they agreed with a pro–lesbian and gay policy: changing state antidiscrimination law to encompass those who identify as lesbian and gay. Overall, this study concludes that a special rights frame dampens support among some while an equal rights frame has no effect. Respondents who indicated that they were against same-sex marriage even more strongly opposed altering antidiscrimination policy to include sexual orientation when confronted with an equal rights frame than when confronted with the special rights frame or no frame at all.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , Summer 2017 , pp. 830 - 854
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Andersen, Ellen Ann. 2005. Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and Snow, David A. 1993 . Master Frames and Cycles of Protest. In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, ed. Morris, Aldon D. and Mueller, Carol McClurg, 133–55. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and Snow, David A. 2000. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26:611–39.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Mary, Marshall, Anna‐Maria, and Barclay, Scott. 2009. The Challenge of Law: Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Social Movements. In Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law, ed. Barclay, Scott, Bernstein, Mary, and Marshall, Anna‐Maria, 1–20. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, Paul R. 2002. Framing, Value Words, and Citizens' Explanations of Their Issue Opinions. Political Communication 19:303–16.Google Scholar
Brewer, Paul R. 2003. The Shifting Foundations of Public Opinion and Gay Rights. Journal of Politics 65:1208–20.Google Scholar
Brydum, Sunnivie. 2012. Poll Discovers How Marriage Won in Washington. The Advocate, December 13. http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2012/12/13/poll-discovers-how-marriage-won-washington (accessed July 24, 2015).Google Scholar
Cappella, Joseph N., and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N. 2007. Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10:103–26.Google Scholar
Craig, Stephen C., Martinez, Michael D., Kane, James G., and Gainous, Jason. 2005. Core Values, Value Conflict, and Citizens' Ambivalence about Gay Rights. Political Research Quarterly 58:5–17.Google Scholar
Dancey, Logan, and Goren, Paul. 2010. Party Identification, Issue Attitudes, and the Dynamics of Political Debate. American Journal of Political Science 54:686–99.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2014. Strange Bedfellows: How an Anticipatory Countermovement Brought Same‐Sex Marriage into the Public Arena. Law & Social Inquiry 39:449–73.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2001. The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence. Political Behavior 23 (3): 225–56.Google Scholar
Dudas, Jeffrey R. 2005. In the Name of Rights: “Special” Rights and the Politics of Resentment in Post–Civil Rights America. Law & Society Review 39:723–57.Google Scholar
Dugan, Kim. 2005. The Struggle Over Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Rights: Facing Off in Cincinnati. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dyck, Joshua J., and Pearson‐Merkowitz, Shanna. 2012. The Conspiracy of Silence: Context and Voting on Gay Marriage Ballot Measures. Political Research Quarterly 65:745–57.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 2002. Equality Practice: Civil Unions and the Future of Gay Rights. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fetner, Tina. 2008. How the Religious Right Shaped Lesbian and Gay Activism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Shauna. 2009. It Takes (at Least) Two to Tango: Fighting with Words in the Conflict over Same‐Sex Marriage. In Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law, ed. Barclay, Scott, Bernstein, Mary, and Marshall, Anna‐Maria, 231–56. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gaines, N. Susan, and Garand, James C. 2010. Morality, Equality, or Locality: Analyzing the Determinants of Support for Same‐Sex Marriage. Political Research Quarterly 63:553–67.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A., and Meyer, David S. 1996. Framing Political Opportunity. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, ed. McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 275–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A., and Modigliani, Andre. 1987. The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action. Research in Political Sociology 3:137–77.Google Scholar
Garber, Andrew. 2006. Effort to Repeal Gay Rights Law Falls Short. Seattle Times, June 6. http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2003044061_webref6506.html (accessed August 28, 2014).Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goldberg‐Hiller, Jonathan. 2002. The Limits to Union: Same‐Sex Marriage and the Politics of Civil Rights. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg‐Hiller, Jonathan. 2009. Do Civil Rights Have a Face? Reading the Iconography of Special Rights. In Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law, ed. Barclay, Scott, Bernstein, Mary, and Marshall, Anna‐Maria, 231–56. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg‐Hiller, Jonathan, and Milner, Neal. 2003. Rights as Excess: Understanding the Politics of Special Rights. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (4): 1075–1118.Google Scholar
Hansen, Bettina. 2012. Referendum 74: A Celebration for the History Books. Seattle Times, November 7. http://seattletimes.com/html/picturethis/2019631397_ref_74_passes_marriage_celebration_capitolhill.html (accessed August 28, 2014).Google Scholar
Hatalsky, Lanae Erickson, and Trumble, Sarah. 2012. How Marriage Won in Washington State. Third Way. http://www.thirdway.org/publications/623 (accessed August 28, 2014).Google Scholar
Herman, Didi. 1997. The Antigay Agenda: Orthodox Vision and the Christian Right. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hull, Kathleen E. 2001. The Political Limits of the Rights Frame: The Case of Same‐Sex Marriage in Hawaii. Social Perspectives 44 (2): 207–32.Google Scholar
Jones, Robert P., Cox, Daniel, and Navarro‐Rivera, Juhem. 2014. A Shifting Landscape: A Decade of Change in American Attitudes about Same‐Sex Marriage and LGBT Issues. Public Religion Research Institute. http://publicreligion.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/2014.LGBT_REPORT.pdf (accessed February 8, 2015).Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. 2009. Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights. Law and Society Review 43 (1): 151–86.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 2004. From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 2013. From the Closet to the Altar: Courts, Backlash, and the Struggle for Same‐Sex Marriage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
La Corte, Rachel. 2006. Gregoire Signs Gay‐Civil‐Rights Bill. Seattle Times, February 1. http://seattletimes.com/html/politics/2002775140_gayrights01m.html (accessed August 28, 2014).Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1965. Public Opinion. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lopez, Ricardo. 2012. New Tune for Gay Marriage Fight. Los Angeles Times, March 4, Main News section, Home edition, A4. http://articles.latimes.com/2012/mar/04/nation/la-na-gay-marriage-20120304 (accessed August 28, 2014).Google Scholar
Lovell, George I. 2012. This Is Not Civil Rights: Discovering Rights Talk in 1939 America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miceli, Melinda S. 2005. Morality Politics vs. Identity Politics: Framing Processes and Competition among Christian Right and Gay Social Movement Organizations. Sociological Forum 20:589–612.Google Scholar
Mucciaroni, Gary. 2011. Are Debates about “Morality Policy” Really about Morality? Framing Opposition to Gay and Lesbian Rights. Policy Studies Journal 39 (2): 187–216.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Kenneth. 2013. Variability or Moderation? The Effects of Ambivalence on Political Opinions. Political Behavior 35:539–65.Google Scholar
National LGBTQ Task Force. 2014. New Name, New Plan for Nation's Oldest National LGBTQ Advocacy Organization. October 4, Press release. http://www.thetaskforce.org/new-name-new-plan-nations-oldest-national-lgbtq-advocacy-organization/ (accessed July 22, 2015).Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe M. 1997. Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance. American Political Science Review 91:567–83.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., and Kinder, Donald. 1996. Issue Frames and Group‐Centrism in American Public Opinion. Journal of Politics 58:1055–78.Google Scholar
Pedriana, N. 2006. From Protective to Equal Treatment: Legal Framing Processes and Transformations of the Women's Movement in the 1960s. American Journal of Sociology 111:‐1718–61.Google Scholar
Pew Research Religion & Public Life Project. 2012. Two‐Thirds of Democrats Now Support Gay Marriage. July 31. http://www.pewforum.org/2012/07/31/2012-opinions-on-for-gay-marriage-unchanged-after-obamas-announcement/ (accessed August 28, 2014).Google Scholar
Price, Vincent, Nir, Lilach, and Cappella, Joseph N. 2005. Framing Public Discussion of Gay Civil Unions. Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (2): 179–212.Google Scholar
Richman, Kimberly D. 2005. (When) Are Rights Wrong? Rights Discourses in Gay and Lesbian Parents' Custody Cases. Law & Social Inquiry 30:137–76.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Darren. 2009. Queer Legal Victories: Intersectionality Revisited. In Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law, ed. Barclay, Scott, Bernstein, Mary, and Marshall, Anna‐Maria, 38–51. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Schachter, Jane. 2009. Courts and the Politics of Backlash: Marriage Equality Litigation, Then and Now. Southern California Law Review 82:1153–1224.Google Scholar
Solomon, Marc. 2014. Winning Marriage: The Inside Story of How Same‐Sex Couples Took in Politicians and Pundits and Won. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Stone, Amy L. 2012. Gay Rights at the Ballot Box. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Turnbull, Lornet, Tu, Janet I., and Susan, Kelleher. 2009. “Everything but Marriage” Backers Smelling Victory. Seattle Times, November 3. http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2010196421_elexref7104m.html (accessed August 26, 2014).Google Scholar
Webley, Kayla. 2013. A State Divided: As Washington Becomes More Liberal, Republicans Push Back. Time, January 15. http://nation.time.com/2013/01/15/a-state-divided-as-washington-becomes-more-liberal-republicans-push-back/ (accessed August 26, 2014).Google Scholar
Williams, Rhys H. 2004. The Cultural Contexts of Collective Action: Constraints, Opportunities, and the Symbolic Life of Social Movements. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, ed. Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 91–115. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wofford, Carrie. 2014. Why Equality Is Winning. U.S. News & World Report, March 26. http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/carrie-wofford/2014/03/26/how-did-public-opinion-on-gay-marriage-shift-so-quickly (accessed August 28, 2014).Google Scholar
Zald, Meyer N. 1996. Culture, Ideology, and Strategic Framing. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, ed. McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 261–274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zemans, Frances Khan. 1983. Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of Law in the Political System. American Political Science Review 77:690–703.Google Scholar
Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015).Google Scholar
2012 Wash. Laws 6239.Google Scholar
2009 Wash. Laws 5688.Google Scholar
2006 Wash. Laws 2661.Google Scholar
Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015).Google Scholar
2012 Wash. Laws 6239.Google Scholar
2009 Wash. Laws 5688.Google Scholar
2006 Wash. Laws 2661.Google Scholar