Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:12:08.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Road Closed: Evaluating the Judicial Bypass Provision of the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Helena Silverstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the extent to which Pennsylvania county courts are prepared to implement the judicial bypass provision of the state's abortion statute. Under the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act it is illegal for physicians to perform abortions on pregnant minors without parental consent. The constitutionality of this requirement has been upheld, but only when states provide a mechanism allowing a minor to bypass parental involvement. The Pennsylvania statute includes a judicial bypass provision that is formally consistent with legal precedent. However, based on a study of how county courts respond to inquiries into the judicial bypass procedure, this paper demonstrates that most courthouses are not prepared to implement or provide accurate information on bypass proceedings. Since the constitutionality of parental involvement requirements is conditioned on the availability of a bypass option, the paper argues that the courts' lack of readiness poses a significant threat to the rights of pregnant minors.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , Winter 1999 , pp. 73 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abortion Report. 1996. Pennsylvania: Custody Law Violator Spared Jail. Lexis-Nexis, 6 December.Google Scholar
Abortion Report. 1997. Pennsylvania: Custody Abortion Case Back in Court. Lexis-Nexis, 12 June.Google Scholar
Cartoof, Virginia G., and Klerman, Lorraine V. 1986. Parental Consent for Abortion: Impact of the Massachusetts Law. American Journal of Public Health 76:397–400.Google Scholar
Donovan, Patricia. 1983. Judging Teenagers: How Minors Fare When They Seek Court-Authorized Abortions. Family Planning Perspectives 15:259–67.Google Scholar
Donovan, Patricia. 1992. Our Daughters' Decisions: The Conflict in State Law on Abortion and Other Issues. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
Gardner, William, and Herman, Janna. 1990. Adolescents' AIDS Risk Taking: A Rational Choice Perspective. In Adolescents in the AIDS Epidemic, ed. Gardner, William. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. 1985. Some Thoughts on Autonomy and Equality in Relation to Roe v. Wade. North Carolina Law Review 63:375–86.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 1996. Rethinking Abortion: Equal Choice, the Constitution, and Reproductive Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haas-Wilson, Deborah. 1993. The Economic Impact of State Restrictions on Abortion: Parental Consent and Notification Law and Medicaid Funding Restrictions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12:498–511.Google Scholar
Henshaw, Stanley K. 1995. The Impact of Requirements for Parental Consent on Minors' Abortions in Mississippi. Family Planning Perspectives 27:120–22.Google Scholar
Henshaw, Stanley K., and Kost, Kathryn. 1992. Parental Involvement in Minors' Abortions Decisions. Family Planning Perspectives 24:196–213.Google Scholar
Law, Sylvia A. 1984. Rethinking Sex and the Constitution. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 132:955–1040.Google Scholar
Pennsylvania Department of Health. 1997. Abortion Statistics. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Department of Health.Google Scholar
Rogers, James L., Boruch, Robert F., Stoms, George B., and DeMoya, Dorothy. 1991. Impact of the Minnesota Parental Notification Law on Abortion and Birth. American Journal of Public Health 81:294–98.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Catherine Grevers. 1993. Where Privacy Fails: Equal Protection and the Abortion Rights of Minors. New York University Law Review 68:597–638.Google Scholar
Scott, Elizabeth S., Dickon Reppucci, N., and Woolard, Jennifer L. 1995. Evaluating Adolescent Decision Making in Legal Contexts. Law and Human Behavior 19:221–44.Google Scholar