Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:52:45.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consensus and Suspicion: Judicial Reasoning and Social Change in an Indonesian Society 1960-1994

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

John R. Bowen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I draw on the archives from two Indonesian courts to analyze how judges have reached decisions in the face of conflicting legal norms. Judges in the town of Takèngën, in the highlands of Aceh province, hear claims based on Islam and on local social norms (adat). Between 1960 and the mid-1990s, they changed the way they resolved disputes over inheritance cases, from accepting village settlements as valid, to rejecting those settlements as either contrary to Islam or as coercive. I examine the justifications offered in the earlier and the later periods for these decisions. I find that in both periods judges employed creative legal devices to resolve or bridge differences between Islam and adat, and that they consistently referred to broader cultural values of agreement and fairness. I suggest that the change in their decisions was due to the combination of political centralization, increased legitimacy of the Islamic court, and judges' perceptions of a more individualized society.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , 2000 , pp. 97 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Law and Society Association

Footnotes

Field research was funded by the National Science Foundation and the Wenner-Gren Foundation. I would like to thank Jack Knight, Daniel Lev, and Susan Silbey for their comments.

References

References

Bellow, Gary, and Minow, Martha (1996) “Introduction: Rita's Case and Other Law Stories,” in Bellow, G. & Minow, M., eds., Law Stories. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von (1984) The Broken Stairways to Consensus: Village Justice and State Courts in Minangkabau. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Bowen, John R. (1988) “The Transformation of an Indonesian Property System: Adat, Islam, and Social Change in the Gayo Highlands.” 15 American Ethnologist 274–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, John R. (1991) Sumatran Politics and Poetics: Gayo History, 1900–1989. Sumatran Politics and Poetics: Gayo History, 1900–1989: Yale Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, John R. (1998) “‘You May Not Give It Away’: How Social Norms Shape Islamic Law in Contemporary Indonesian Jurisprudence.” 5 (Oct.) Islamic Law and Society 1–27.Google Scholar
Bowen, John R. (1999) “Legal Reasoning and Public Discourse in Indonesian Islam,” in Eickelman, D.F. & Anderson, J.W., eds., New Media in the Muslim World: The Emerging Public Sphere. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Nathan J. (1997) The Rule of Law in the Arab World: Courts in Egypt and the Gulf. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cammack, Mark (1997) “Indonesia's 1989 Religious Judicature Act: Islamization of Indonesia or Indonesianization of Islam?” 63 Indonesia 143–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chanock, Martin (1985) Law, Custom and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John, & Roberts, Simon (1981) Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coulson, N.J. (1971) Succession in the Muslim Family. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Departemen Kehakiman (1973) Masalah-masalah hukum perdata di Takengon [Civil law issues in Takengon]. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pembinaan Badan-Badan Peradilan, Departemen Kehakiman.Google Scholar
Departemen Kehakiman (1984) Masalah-masalah hukum perdata adat di Daerah Bekas Kawedanan Takengon [Adat civil law issues in the former subdistrict of Takengon]. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pembinaan Badan-Badan Peradilan, Departemen Kehakiman.Google Scholar
Ellen, Roy F. (1983) “Social Theory, Ethnography, and the Understanding of Practical Islam in South-East Asia,” in Hooker, M.B., ed., Islam in South-East Asia. Leiden, Netherlands: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, & Knight, Jack (1998) The Choices Judges Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Esposito, John L. (1982) Women in Muslim Family Law. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1983) “Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective,” in Geertz, C., ed., Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. (1992) The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, Peter (1990) “Dead Goats and Broken Betrothals: Liability and Equity in Dou Donggo Law.” 17 American Ethnologist 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karsten, Peter (1997) Heart Versus Head: Judge-Made Law in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kell, Tim (1995) The Roots of Acehnese Rebellion, 1989–1992. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, Monograph No. 74.Google Scholar
Lev, Daniel S. (1965) “The Lady and the Banyan Tree: Civil-Law Change in Indonesia” 14 American J. of Comparative Law 282–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev, Daniel S. (1972) Islamic Courts in Indonesia: A Study in the Political Bases of Legal Institutions. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Lev, Daniel S. (1996) “Between State and Society: Professional Lawyers and Reform in Indonesia,” In D. S., Lev, & R. McVey, eds., Making Indonesia: Essays on Modern Indonesia in Honor of George McT. Kahin. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications, Studies on Southeast Asia No. 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libson, Gideon (1997) “On the Development of Custom as a Source of Law in Islamic Law.” 4 (June) Islamic Law & Society 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1992) “Anthropology, Law, and Transnational Processes.” 21 Annual Rev. of Anthropology 357–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, Brinkley (1993) The Calligraphic State: Textual Domination and History in a Muslim Society. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk (1986) Social Facts and Fabrications: “Customary Law” on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pompe, S. (1996) “The Indonesian Supreme Court: Fifty Years of Judicial Development.” Diss, at Leiden Univ., Faculty of Law, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Rosen, Lawrence (1989) The Anthropology of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Santos, Santos Boaventura de (1987) “Law: A Map of Misreading, Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law.” 14 J. of Law and Society 279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subekti, R., & Tamara, J., eds. (1965) Kumpulan Putusan Mahkamah Aguing [Collection of Supreme Court decisions]. 2d ed. Jakarta: Gunung Agung.Google Scholar
Subekti, R., & Tjitrosudibio, R., eds. (1961) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Pradaja Paramita.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (1996) Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. (1993) “The Folly of the ‘Social Scientific’ Concept of Legal Pluralism.” 20 J. of Law & Society 192–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

Inën Deraman v. Inen Nur (PA 25/1962).Google Scholar
Inën Saidah v. Aman Jemilah (PN 47/1964).Google Scholar
Samadiah v. Hasan Ali (PA 381/1987).Google Scholar
Sulaiman v. M. Ali (PA 60/1973).Google Scholar
Usman v. Serikulah (PA 41/1961).Google Scholar