Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:30:21.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Much Does Law Matter? Labor Law, Competition, and Waterfront Labor Relations in Rotterdam and U.S. Ports

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Robert A. Kagan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In an increasingly competitive world marketplace, can cross-national variations in law—in this case, in labor law—produce markedly different economic outcomes? In both The Netherlands and the United States, law has helped rationalize the hiring of port labor and provide dockworkers greater security. However, American longshoremen have captured a larger share of the productivity gains flowing from the mechanization of cargo handling than have Dutch dockworkers. Because of constraints imposed by American longshore unions, container terminals in Rotterdam are more efficient and less costly to users. These differences can in part be explained by American labor law, which encourages a more adversarial, self-seeking union posture than does the labor law structure in The Netherlands. Probably more important, however, are economic factors, which expose Dutch dockworkers (but not West Coast longshoremen) to competition from ports in other nations. Similarly, international competition, intensified by the technological revolution in transportation, seems likely to impel cross-national convergence in many spheres, leveling differences in law and in legally influenced outcomes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , 1990 , pp. 35 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

The Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study provided support for research on which this paper is based. Additional support has been provided by the Institute for Governmental Studies and the Center for the Study of Law and Society, University of California, Berkeley, as well as the Center for Advanced Study in Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, California. Thanks are due Hendrik De Ru, Lloyd Ulman, Earl Westfall, Eric Nijhof, Harold Wilensky, Henry Farber, Joel Rogers, and Nelson Polsby for their helpful comments on earlier drafts, to Kurt DeBelder for translating Dutch sources, and to Anthony Brantenaar and Diana Watts for helping to arrange interviews in Rotterdam.

References

References

BADARACCO, Joseph (1985) Loading the Dice: A Five Country Study of Vinyl Chloride Regulation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
BALL, Joseph H. (1966) The Government-subsidized Union Monopoly: A Study of Labor Practices in the Shipping Industry. Washington, D.C.: Labor Policy Association.Google Scholar
BAYLEY, David (1976) Forces of Order: Police Behavior in Japan and the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
BELL, Daniel (1964) “The Racket-ridden Longshoremen: The Web of Economics and Politics” in Daniel Bell, The End of Ideology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
BIRD, James, and Gail, BLAND (1988) “Freight Forwarders Speak: The Perception of Route Competition via Seaports in the European Communities Research Project, Part 1,” 15 Maritime Policy and Management 35.Google Scholar
BOGAERT, Michael (1970) Trade Unionism in Indian Ports: A Case Study at Calcutta and Bombay. New Delhi: Shri Ram Centre for Industrial Relations.Google Scholar
BOK, Derek C. (1971) “Reflections on the Distinctive Character of American Labor Law,” 84 Harvard Law Review 1394.Google Scholar
BOYES, Jane R.C. (1989) “New York Strives for a Comeback,” Containerization International 5 (July).Google Scholar
BRAITHWAITE, John (1985) To Punish or Persuade: Enforcement of Coal Mine Safety. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
BRICKMAN, Ronald, Sheila, JASANOFF, and Thomas, ILGEN (1985) Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
CAMERON, David R. (1984) “Social Democracy, Corporatism, Labor Quiescence, and the Representation of Economic Interests in Advanced Capitalist Society” in Goldthorpe, J., ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, Scott (1986) Transformation of the San Francisco Bay Area Shipping Industry and Its Regional Impacts. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Urban and Regional Development.Google Scholar
CARDING, Tony (1989) “Costs Cripple British Ports,” Container News, 12 (September).Google Scholar
CARGO, SYSTEMS (1989) “Slicing the Intermodal Lake,” Cargo Systems, 39 (March).Google Scholar
CHAMPION, Vincent (1989) “Spanish Ports Travel a Difficult Road,” Cargo Systems, 30 (January).Google Scholar
Kang, CH'EN (1977) “Changes at the Shanghai Harbor Docks,” in Andors, Stephen, ed., Workers and Workplaces in Revolutionary China. White Plains, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
COLE, Susan K. (1989) “U.S./Australian Trade a Difficult Proposition for Many Ocean Carriers,” Pacific Shipper 6–7 (September 4).Google Scholar
CONTAINERISATION INTERNATIONAL (1989) “Italian Labour Reforms Aim to Revitalize Major Ports,” Containersation International, Special Supplement, p. viii.Google Scholar
COOPER, Frederick (1987) On the African Waterfront: Urban Disorder and the Transformation of Work in Colonial Mombasa. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
DANSIE, Janet (1989) “Look Out for the Port Side,” Cargo Systems, 63 (May).Google Scholar
DAY, Patricia, and Rudolf, KLEIN (1987) “The Regulation of Nursing Homes: A Comparative Perspective,” 65 Milbank Quarterly 303.Google Scholar
DE PALMA, Anthony (1989) “Longshore Hiring Shape Ends in New York Harbor,” New York Times p. A-6 (June 6).Google Scholar
ECONOMIST (1988) “Dock-Labour Scheme: Quaint Seaside Customs,” Economist, 51–52 (July 2).Google Scholar
ECONOMIST (1989a) “Tax Burden,” Economist 105 (September 30).Google Scholar
ECONOMIST (1989b) “Labour Costs,” Economist 81 (August 6).Google Scholar
FADEM, Joel (1967) “The Case of the Australian Waterfront: Organizational Design,” Journal of Industrial Relations, 26 (March).Google Scholar
FAIRLEY, Lincoln (1979) Facing Mechanization: The West Coast Longshore Plan. Los Angeles: Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
FINLAY, William (1988) Work on the Waterfront: Worker Power and Technological Change in a West Coast Port. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
FLANAGAN, Robert J. (1987) Labor Relations and the Litigation Explosion. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
FLANAGAN, Robert J., David, SOSKICE, and Lloyd, ULMAN (1983) Unionism, Economic Stabilization, and Incomes Policies: European Experience. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
FREEMAN, Richard B. (1988) “Labor Market Institutions and Economic Performance,” 3 Economic Policy 64.Google Scholar
FREEMAN, Richard B., and James L., MEDOFF (1984) What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1983) “Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don't Know (and Think We Know) About Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society,” 31 U.C.L.A. Law Review 4.Google Scholar
HARTMAN, Paul T. (1969) Collective Bargaining and Productivity: The Longshore Mechanization Agreement. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAVLICEK, Dieter (1988) Experience with Labor Redundancy Schemes in the Transport Sector in Western Europe, the United States, and Japan. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
HAWLEY, Ellis W. (1966) The New Deal and The Problem of Monopoly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOBSBAWM, E. J. (1964) Labouring Men: Studies in the History of Labour. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
ILWU, DISPATCHER (1988) “Computer Jurisdiction Protected,” ILWU Dispatchers 1, 3 (December 13).Google Scholar
JASANOFF, Sheila (1986) Risk Management and Political Culture. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
JENSEN, Vernon (1964) The Hiring of Dockworkers and Employment Practices in the Ports of New York, Liverpool, London, Rotterdam and Marseilles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
JENSEN, Vernon-(1974) Strife on the Waterfront: The Port of New York Since 1945. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
JOSEPH, Gloria (1988) “Box-moving Costs Vary Widely at Top 3 North Atlantic Ports,” Journal of Commerce, 10B (July 28).Google Scholar
KAGAN, Robert A. (1988) “What Makes Uncle Sammy Sue?” 21 Law & Society Review 717.Google Scholar
KAGAN, Robert A.-(1989) “Understanding Regulatory Enforcement,” 11 Law & Policy 89.Google Scholar
KELMAN, Steven (1981) Regulating America, Regulating Sweden: A Comparative Study of Occupational Safety and Health Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
KERR, Clark, and Lloyd, FISHER (1949) “Conflict on the Waterfront,” Atlantic Monthly 17 (September).Google Scholar
KERR, Clark, and Abraham, SIEGEL (1964) “The Interindustry Propensity to Strike—An International Comparison,” in Kerr, Clark, ed., Labor and Management in Industrial Society. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
KIMELDORF, Howard (198) Reds or Rackets? The Making of Radical and Conservative Unions on the Waterfront. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
KIRP, David L. (1982) “Professionalization as a Policy Choice: British Special Education in Comparative Perspective,” 34 World Politics 137.Google Scholar
KIRP, David L. (1979) Doing Good by Doing Little: Race and Schooling in Britain. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
KNEGT, Robert (1989) “Regulating Dismissal from Employment: Administrative and Judicial Procedures in The Netherlands,” 11 Law & Policy 175.Google Scholar
KUTLER, Stanley I. (1982) The American Inquisition: Justice and Injustice in the Cold War. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
LANGBEIN, John H. (1985) “The German Advantage in Civil Procedure,” 52 University of Chicago Law Review 823.Google Scholar
LARROWE, Charles P. (1955) Shape-up and Hiring Hall: A Comparison of Hiring Methods and Labor Relations on the New York and Seattle Waterfronts. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LARROWE, Charles P.-(1972) Harry Bridges: The Rise and Fall of Radical Labor in the United States. Westport, CT: Lawrence Hill & Co.Google Scholar
LEVENBACH, M. G. (1964) “Sociaal Bestuur,” in Nederlands Bestuursrecht III. Samson: Alphen aan den Rijn.Google Scholar
LEVY, Robert D. (1988) “The Relation of U.S. West Coast Port Authorities to Longshore Labor and the Multi-Employer Bargaining Group.” M.A. Thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar
LIJPHART, Arend (1975) The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in The Netherlands. 2d Ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
LIPSET, Seymour Martin (1986) “North American Labor Movements: A Comparative Perspective,” in Lipset, S. M. (ed.), Unions in Transition. San Francisco: Institute of Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
LIS, Catherina (1986) Social Change and the Labouring Poor: Antwerp, 1770–1860. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LUNDQVIST, Lennart J. (1980) The Hare and The Tortoise: Clean Air Policies in the United States and Sweden. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
MILLER, Raymond C. (1969) “The Dockworker Subculture and Some Problems in Cross-cultural and Cross-Time Generalizations,” 11 Comparative Studies in Society & History 302.Google Scholar
MNOOKIN, Robert H., and Lewis, KORNHAUSER (1979) “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce,” 88 Yale Law Journal 950.Google Scholar
MORRIS, R. (1983) “The Melbourne Dockers War,” 10 Maritime Policy & Management 53.Google Scholar
MUNDFORD, Chris (1989) “Australian Port Strategy: Enterprise Initiative,” Cargo Systems 51 (June).Google Scholar
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (1986) Improving Productivity in U.S. Marine Container Terminals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
NIJHOF, Erik (1988) “Gezien de Dreigende Onrust in De Haven.”: De Ontwikkelung van de Arbeidsverhoudingen in de Rotterdamse Haven, 1945–1965 (“In Light of the Threat of Unrest in the Port…”: The Development of Industrial Relations in the Port of Rotterdam, 1945-65). Amsterdam: Stichting beheer IISG.Google Scholar
NIJHOF, Erik, and Peter, SCHRAGE (1988) “Behind the Picketline: The Home Front of the Rotterdam Dockers in Times of Social Warfare, 1900-1980,” in Heerma van Voss, L. & Diederiks, H. (eds.), Industrial Conflict: Papers Presented to the Fourth British-Dutch Conference on Labour History. Amsterdam: Stichting beheer IISG.Google Scholar
NORTHRUP, Herbert R. (1942) “The New Orleans Longshoremen,” 57 Political Science Quarterly 526.Google Scholar
O'BYRNE, Leo (1987) “Spain: Port Development,” Cargo Systems, 37 (December).Google Scholar
OECD (1987) OECD Economic Surveys: Netherlands. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
OECD-(1986) OECD Economic Surveys: Netherlands. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION (1988) Annual Report. San Francisco: Pacific Maritime Association.Google Scholar
PELS, P. S. (1957) “The Development of Collective Employment Agreements in The Netherlands” in Sturmthal, A. (ed.), Contemporary Collective Bargaining in Seven Countries. Ithaca, NY: Institute of International Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University.Google Scholar
PEPER, Bram, and Gerrit VAN, KOOTEN (1983) “The Netherlands: From an Ordered Harmonic to a Bargaining Relationship,” in Barkin, Solomon (ed.), Worker Militancy and Its Consequences: The Changing Climate of Western Industrial Relations. 2d Ed. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
PHILLIPS, Gordon, and Noel, WHITESIDE (1985) Casual Labor: The Unemployment Question in the Port Transport Industry, 1880–1970. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
QUAM, Lois, Robert, DINGWALL, and Paul, FENN (1987) “Medical Malpractice in Perspective,” 294 British Medical Journal 1529–31; 1597–1600.Google Scholar
RAYACICH, Daniel (1986) “Marine Terminal Operations in the United State,” in National Research Council, Improving Productivity in U.S. Marine Container Terminals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
ROGERS, Joel (1990) “Divide and Conquer: Further ‘Reflections on the Distinctive Character of American Labor Laws,‘” 1990 Wisconsin Law Review (in press).Google Scholar
ROGERS, Sidney (1979) “Six Longshoremen in Rotterdam,” in Schrank, Robert (ed.), American Workers Abroad. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
ROSS, Philip (1970) “Waterfront Labor Response to Technological Change: A Tale of Two Unions,” 21 Labor Law Journal 397.Google Scholar
SCHNEIDER, Betty, and Abraham, SIEGEL (1956) Industrial Relations in the Pacific Coast Longshore Industry. Berkeley: Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California.Google Scholar
SCHUMPETER, Joseph (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
STURMTHAL, Adolf (1957) “An Essay on Comparative Collective Bargaining” in Sturmthal, A. (ed.), Contemporary Collective Bargaining in Seven Countries. Ithaca, NY: Institute of International Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University.Google Scholar
THOMSON, A. (1981) “A View From Abroad,” in Stieber, J., McKersie, R. B., and Mills, D. Q. (eds.), U.S. Industrial Relations, 1950–1980. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.Google Scholar
VAIL, Bruce (1988) “Genoa Pushes to Reclaim Status in Med,” American Shipper 48 (April).Google Scholar
VAN ESVELD, N. E. H. and VAN AERDE, J. A. O. M. (1978) “Labour Law,” in Netherlands Comparative Law Association, Introduction to Dutch Law for Foreign Lawyers. Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
VAN VOORDEN, William (1984) “Employers Associations in The Netherlands” in Windmuller, John P. and Gladstone, Alan (eds.), Employers Associations and Industrial Relations: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
VOGEL, David (1986) National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
WALDRON, Arthur (1985) “Japan: The Legal Roots of Labor Peace,” Public Interest 421 (Summer).Google Scholar
WALLERSTEIN, M. (1985) “Working Class Solidarity and Rational Behavior.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
WILENSKY, Harold (1976) The “New Corporatism,” Centralization, and the Welfare State. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Case Cited

Schechter Poultry v. United States, 294 U.S. 495 (1935).Google Scholar

Statute Cited

National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 151–168 (1935).Google Scholar