No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Belén Olmos Giupponi, Trade Agreements, Investment Protection and Dispute Settlement in Latin America, Wolters Kluwer, 2019, 413 pp, ISBN 9789041182333, €205
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 November 2020
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
1 B. Olmos Giupponi, Trade Agreements, Investment Protection and Dispute Settlement in Latin America (2019), at 36.
2 Quoted in V. R. Fernández and G. Brondino, Development in Latin America: Critical Discussions from the Periphery (2019), at 1.
3 Olmos Giupponi, supra note 1, at 4.
4 Ibid., at 409.
5 Ibid., at 13.
6 Ibid., at 25.
7 M. N. Hodgson, ‘Reform and Adaptation: The Experience of the Americas with International Investment Law’, (2020) 21 The Journal of World Investment & Trade 140.
8 A. Titi, ‘Investment Arbitration in Latin America: The Uncertain Veracity of Preconceived Ideas’, (2014) 30 Arbitration International 357, at 363.
9 See B. M. Cremades, ‘Resurgence of the Calvo Doctrine in Latin America’, (2006) 7 Business Law International 53; S. Montt, ‘What International Investment Law and Latin America Can and Should Demand from Each Other. Updating the Bello/Calvo Doctrine in the BIT Generation’, (2007) 3 Res Publica Argentina 75; W. Shan, ‘Is Calvo Dead?’, (2007) 55 American Journal of Comparative Law 123; R. Polanco Lazo, ‘The no of Tokyo Revisited: Or How Developed Countries Learned to Start Worrying and Love the Calvo Doctrine’, (2015) 30 ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal 172; P. Juillard, ‘Calvo Doctrine/Calvo Clause’, (2007) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law; O.M. Garibaldi, ‘Carlos Calvo Redivivus: The Rediscovery of the Calvo Doctrine in the Era of Investment Treaties’, (2006) 3 Transnational Dispute Management 1; O. E. García-Bolívar, ‘Sovereignty vs. Investment protection: back to Calvo?’, (2009) 24 ICSID Review 464.
10 Olmos Giupponi, supra note 1, at 94–5.
11 Ibid., at 177.
12 Ibid., at 57.
13 Ibid., at 55.
14 ‘Ecuador Model BIT Gives State Space to Regulate’, Global Arbitration Review, 16 March 2018, available at globalarbitrationreview.com/article/1166677/ecuador-model-bit-gives-state-space-to-regulate.
15 Olmos Giupponi, supra note 1, at 385.
16 G. Vidigal and B. Stevens, ‘Brazil’s New Model of Dispute Settlement for Investment: Return to the Past or Alternative for the Future?’, (2018) 19 Journal of World Investment & Trade 475, at 475.
17 Olmos Giupponi, supra note 1, at 63–76.
18 Ibid., at 388.
19 Ibid., at 220. At the time of writing the appellate body has yet to be established.
20 Cf. K. Greenman, ‘Aliens in Latin America: Intervention, Arbitration and State Responsibility for Rebels’, (2018) 31 Leiden Journal of International Law 617.
21 Olmos Giupponi, supra note 1, at 128.
22 Ibid., at 130.
23 Ibid., at 135.
24 C. P. Bown and M. Wu, ‘Safeguards and the perils of preferential trade agreements: Dominican Republic–Safeguard Measures’, (2014) 13 World Trade Review 179.
25 Olmos Giupponi, supra note 1, at 159.