Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:49:01.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship between thallus size and apothecium density in two alpine umbilicate lichens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2009

Akira SHIMIZU  and
Takuya KUBO
Akira SHIMIZU
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan. Email: a-shim@mte.biglobe.ne.jp
Takuya KUBO
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan. Email: a-shim@mte.biglobe.ne.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between thallus size and apothecium density was studied in two umbilicate lichens, Umbilicaria cylindrica and Lasallia pensylvanica, growing in alpine rock surface environments. Samples of the two lichens were collected from the Daisetsuzan National Park, northern Japan. Umbilicaria cylindrica produced many smaller apothecia, whereas L. pensylvanica had larger but fewer apothecia. To explain the differences in reproductive efforts between these two species, we analyzed the lichen data using a hierarchical Bayesian model in which the density of apothecia for each species was predicted by the thallus area and the sky openness index (SOI). The Bayesian model including unobservable effects, i.e. the random effects of individual lichens and rock faces, predicted that the apothecium density for both species increased as the thallus area increased. The estimated coefficient of thallus area to apothecium density for U. cylindrica was larger than that for L. pensylvanica. We also detected a probable positive relationship between SOI and apothecium density for U. cylindrica, whereas none was detected for L. pensylvanica.

Keywords

apotheciaaspectBayesian modellingsky opennessthallus area
Type
Research Article
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , May 2009 , pp. 285 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, R. A. (1975) The influence of aspect on the pattern of seasonal growth in the lichen Parmelia glabratula ssp. fuliginosa (Fr. ex Duby) Laund. New Phytologist 75: 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, R. A. (2002) The effect of rock surface aspect on growth, size structure and competition in the lichen Rhizocarpon geographicum. Environmental and Experimental Botany 48: 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J., Mohan, J., Dietze, M. & Ibanez, I. (2003). Coexistence: how to identify trophic trade-offs. Ecology 84: 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. S. & Gelfand, A. (2006) Hierarchical Modelling for the Environmental Sciences: Statistical Methods and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, M. J. (2005) Statistics: an Introduction Using R. John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlman, L. & Palmqvist, K. (2003) Growth in two foliose tripartite lichens, Nephroma arcticum and Peltigera aphthosa: empirical modelling of external vs internal factors. Functional Ecology 17: 821–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, T. & Klinkhamer, P. (2005) Evolutionary Ecology of Plant Reproductive Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gauslaa, Y., Lie, M., Solhaug, K. A. & Ohlson, M. (2006) Growth and ecophysiological acclimation of the foliose lichen Lobaria pulmonaria in forests with contrasting light climates. Oecologia 147: 406–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauslaa, Y. & Solhaug, K. A. (1998) The significance of thallus size for the water economy of the cyanobacterial old-forest lichen Degelia plumbea. Oecologia 116: 76–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S. & Rubin, D. B. (2003) Bayesian Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hájek, J., Barták, M. & Dubová, J. (2006) Inhibition of photosynthetic processes in foliose lichens induced by temperature and osmotic stress. Biologia Plantarum 50: 624–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, P. M., Walton, D. W. H. & Rothery, P. (1989) The effects of temperature and moisture on CO2 uptake and total resistance to water loss in the Antarctic foliose lichen Umbilicaria antarctica. New Phytologist 111: 673–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, H. B., Clair, L. S. St. & Eggett, D. L. (2006) Size is not a reliable measure of sexual fecundity in two species of lichenized fungi. Bryologist 109: 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. (1999). The insignificance of statistical significance testing. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 763–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsui, Y., Takahashi, T. & Doi, S. (1953) The Geological Sheet Map “Tokachidake”, scale 1: 50,000, and its explanatory text. Hokkaido: Hokkaido Development Agency [in Japanese with English abstract].Google Scholar
Kurokawa, S. (2006) Phytogeographical elements of the lichen flora of Japan. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 100: 721–738.Google Scholar
Lange, O. L. (2003) Photosynthetic productivity of the epilithic lichen Lecanora muralis: long-term field monitoring of CO2 exchange and its physiological interpretation 2. Diel and seasonal patterns of net photosynthesis and respiration. Flora 198: 55–70.Google Scholar
Larson, D. W. (1984) Thallus size as a complicating factor in the physiological ecology of lichens. New Phytologist 97: 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monte, M. (1993) The influence of environmental conditions on the reproduction and distribution of epilithic lichens. Aerobiologia 9: 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, A., Chen, D. & Taylor, J. W. (2003) Sexual fecundity is correlated to size in the lichenized fungus Xanthoparmelia cumberlandia. Bryologist 106: 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2006). R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Ramstad, S. & Hestmark, G. (2001) Population structure and size-dependent reproductive effort in Umbilicaria spodochroa. Mycologia 93: 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reekie, E.G. & Bazzaz, F.A. (2005). Reproductive Allocation in Plants. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sancho, L. G. & Kappen, L. (1989) Photosynthesis and water relations and the role of anatomy in Umbilicariaceae (lichens) from Central Spain. Oecologia 81: 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, A. (2004) Community structure of lichens in the volcanic highlands of Mt. Tokachi, Hokkaido, Japan. Bryologist 107: 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, A., Inoue, M. & Moon, K. H. (2004) Lichen flora of Mt. Tokachi, Hokkaido, Japan. Bulletin of National Science Museum, Tokyo, Series B, 30: 89–102.Google Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N. G. & Lunn, D.(2003) WinBUGS 1.4 Manual. London: Imperial College & MRC Biostatistics Unit, IPH.Google Scholar
Sturtz, S., Ligges, U. & Gelman, A. (2005). R2WinBUGS: a package for running WinBUGS from. R. Journal of Statistical Software 12:1–15.Google Scholar
Valladares, F., Ascaso, C. & Sancho, L. G. (1993) Intrathalline variability of some structural and physical parameters in the lichen genus Lasallia. Canadian Journal of Botany 72: 415–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, J. & Jiang, Y. (1993) The Asian Umbilicariaceae. Mycosystema Monographicum Series No.1. Beijing: International Academic Publishers.Google Scholar