Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:30:17.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do I Contribute More When I Trust More? Differential Effects of Cognition- and Affect-Based Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Kok-Yee Ng  and
Roy Y.J. Chua
Translated by
黄国燕  and
蔡泳瑜
Kok-Yee Ng
Affiliation:
Nanyang Business School, Singapore
Roy Y.J. Chua
Affiliation:
Columbia University, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between level of trust and cooperative behaviours in a social dilemma. We argue that this relationship should depend on the basis of trust (cognition- versus affect-based) and on beliefs about the equality of resource endowments. Results supported our prediction that increasing affect-based trust increases cooperation, but increasing cognition-based trust to a certain level can reduce cooperation because of free-riding tendency. Moreover, these effects of trust are stronger for individuals who believed that other group members had more resources than they did. Thus, our study demonstrates that higher levels of trust do not necessarily encourage cooperation. Implications of these findings are discussed.

摘要

摘要

本文在社会两难情境下研究了信任程度和合作行为的关系。作者提出，这一关系依赖于信任的基础（基于认知的信任还是基于情感的信任）以及对平等拥有资源的信念。研究结果支持了作者的假设，即提髙情感信任会增进合作行为，而在认知信任提髙到一定程度后会导致'搭便车'倾向，而降低合作行为。本文进一步发现，当个体相信群体中其他成员比他们拥有更多资源时，这种信任的负效应更为突出。所以，本文认为较髙的信任并不一定提高合作水平。文章最后讨论了这些发现的理论和实践含意。

Keywords

信任社会两难团队合作群体
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 43 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, S. T. and Messick, D. M. (1990). ‘Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources’. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 3, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K. and Reed II., A. (1998). ‘A social dilemma perspective on cooperative behavior in organizations: The effects of scarcity, communication, and unequal access on the use of a shared resource’. Group and Organization Management, 23, 665–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., Steisel, V. and Kay, A. (1992). ‘The effects of resource distribution, voice, and decision framing on the provision of public goods’. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36, 665–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, M., Gibbons, R., Thompson, L. and Valley, K. (1994). ‘When and why do negotiators outperform game theory?’ In Stern, R. N. and Halpern, J. (Ed.), Nonrational Elements of Organizational Decision Making. Ithaca, NY: Industrial and Labor Relations Press, (pp. 78–98).Google Scholar
Billig, M. and Tajfel, H. (1973). ‘Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockner, J., Siegel, P. A., Daly, J. P., Tyler, T. and Martin, C. (1997). ‘When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 558–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G.J. and Higgs, A. C. (1993). ‘Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups’. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. P., Au, W. T. and Komorita, S. S. (1996). ‘Sequential choice in a step-level public goods dilemma: The effects of criticality and uncertainty’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Brockner, J. and Katz, T. (1998). ‘Toward an explanation of cultural differences in in-group favoritism; The role of individual versus collective primacy’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 75, 1490–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. C., Chen, X. P. and Meindl, J. R. (1998). ‘How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism’. Academy of Management Review, 23, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. S. (1984). ‘Record keeping in two types of relationships’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 549–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, M. S. and Mills, J. (1979). ‘Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. G. and Bailey, D. E. (1997). ‘What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite’. Journal of Management, 23, 239–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, C. L., Dyck, B. and Frohlich, N. (1992). ‘Improving the effectiveness of gainsharing: The role of fairness and participation’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 471–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotton, J. L. (1993). Employee Involvement: Methods for Improving Performance and Work Attitudes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Crosby, F. (1976). ‘A model of egoistic relative deprivation’. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, R. M. (1980). ‘Social dilemmas’. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, K. T. (1999). ‘The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 445–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dirks, K. T. (2000). ‘Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 1004–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dirks, K. T. and Ferrin, D. L. (2002). ‘Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drolet, A. L. and Morris, M. W. (2000). ‘Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 1, 26–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earley, P.C. (1989). ‘Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 565–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1954). ‘A theory of social comparisons processes’. Human Relations, 7, 117–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleishman, J. A. (1988). ‘The effects of decision framing and others’ behavior on cooperation in a social dilemma’. Journal of Cotfiict Resolution, 32, 162–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golembiewski, R. T. and McConkie, M. (1975). ‘The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes’. In Cooper, C. L. (Ed.), Theories of Group Processes. London: Wiley, (pp. 131–85).Google Scholar
Higgins, T.E. (1998). ‘Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle’. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press, (pp. 1–46).Google Scholar
Ilgen, D. R. and Pulakos, E. (1999). The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation, and Development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Johnson-George, C. and Swap, W. C. (1982). ‘Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1306–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, N. (1983). ‘Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, N. and Bruun, S. E. (1983). ‘Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R. M. (1999). ‘Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions’. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, R. M., Brewer, M. B. and Hanna, B. A. (1996). ‘Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision’. In Kramer, R. M. and Tyler, T. R. (Ed.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, (pp. 357–89).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R. M., Hanna, B. A., Su, S. and Wei, J. (2001). ‘Collective identity, collective trust, and social capital: Linking group identification and group cooperation’. In Turner, M. E. (Ed.), Groups at Work: Theory and Research. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, (pp. 173–96).Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M. and Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Langfred, C. (2004). ‘Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams’. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 385–99.Google Scholar
Lawler, E. E. III. (1999). ‘Employee involvement makes a difference’. Journal for Quality and Participation, 22, 5, 18–20.Google Scholar
Leung, K. and Bond, M. H. (1984). ‘The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 4, 793–804.Google Scholar
Leung, K. and Iwawaki, S. (1988). ‘Cultural collectivism and distributive behavior’. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19, 1, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewicki, R.J. and Bunker, B. B. (1995). ‘Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline’. In Bunker, B. B., Rubin, J. Z. and Associates (Ed.), Conflict, Cooperation and Justice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, (pp. 133–74).Google Scholar
Lewield, R.J. and Bunker, B. B. (1996). ‘Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships’. In Kramer, R. M. and Tyler, T. R. (Ed.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, (pp. 114–39).Google Scholar
Lewis, J. D. and Weigert, A. (1985). ‘Trust as a social reality’. Social Forces, 63, 967–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. and Schoorman, F. D. (1995). ‘An integrative model of organizational trust’. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, D.J. (1995). ‘Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations’. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.Google Scholar
McAllister, D.J. (1997). ‘The second face of trust: Reflections on the dark side of interpersonal trust in organizations’. In Lewicki, R.J., Bies, R.J. and Sheppard, B. H. (Ed.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press, (pp. 87–111).Google Scholar
McShane, S. L. and Von Glinow, M. A. (2000). Organizational Behavior. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Messick, D. M. and Brewer, M. B. (1983). ‘Solving social dilemmas: A review’. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 10–43.Google Scholar
Messick, D. M., Wilke, H., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R. M., Zemke, P. E. and Lui, L. (1983). ‘Individual adaptations and structural changes as solutions to social dilemmas’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. W., Sim, D. L. H. and Girotto, V. (1998). ‘Distinguishing sources of cooperation in the one-round prisoner's dilemma: Evidence for cooperative decisions based on the illusion of control’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 494–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbell, J. and Dawes, R. (1981). ‘Social dilemmas’. In Stephenson, G. and Davis, J. H. (Ed.), Progress in Applied Social Psychology. Chichester, England: Wiley, (pp. 37–66).Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H. and Fetter, R. (1990). ‘Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors’. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 2, 107–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, D. G. (1983). ‘Experimental gaming and the goal/expectation hypothesis’. Small Groups and Social Interaction, 2, 107–21.Google Scholar
Pruitt, D. G. and Kimmel, M.J. (1977). ‘Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future’. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 3–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, A. (1988). ‘Provision of step-level public goods: Effects of inequality in resources’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 432–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, A., Bornstein, G. and Erev, I. (1989). ‘Intergroup competition for public goods: Effects of unequal resources and group size’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 748–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G. and Zanna, M. D. (1985). ‘Trust in close relationships’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutte, C. G., Wilke, H. A. M. and Messick, D. M. (1987). ‘Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environments as determinants of behavior in resource dilemma’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 208–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, D. A., Jensen, T., Reed, A., Sullivan, D. and Schwab, M. (1983). ‘The actions of others as determinants of behavior in social trap situations’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 552–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniezek, J. A., May, D. R. and Sawyer, J. E. (1990). ‘Social uncertainty and interdependence: A study of resource allocation decisions in groups’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group Process and Productivity. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P. and Flamen, T. C. (1971). ‘Social categorization and intergroup behavior’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 439–43.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A. and Werner, J. M. (1998). ‘Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior’. Academy of Management Review, 23, 513–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, K. and Karau, S. (1991). ‘Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed