Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:12:47.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using scars to photo-identify the goliath grouper, Epinephelus itajara

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2014

Vinicius J. Giglio ,
Johnatas Adelir-Alves  and
Athila A. Bertoncini Open the ORCID record for Athila A. Bertoncini [Opens in a new window]
Vinicius J. Giglio*
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
Johnatas Adelir-Alves
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduaçãeo em Sistemas Aquáticos Tropicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus-BA, Brazil
Athila A. Bertoncini
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Biodiversidade Neotropical), Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: V.J. Giglio, Programa de Pós-Graduaçäo em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro 88010-970, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil email: vj.giglio@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Herein, we describe the use of scars to photo-identify the goliath grouper, Epinephelus itajara. Three individuals were photo-identified and re-sighted several times at the same site along the Brazilian coast, including the longest report for site fidelity, with more than four years.

Keywords

mark–recapturephoto-identificationreef fishendangered speciesmarine megafaunamovement patternssite fidelitybehaviourjewfish
Type
Research Article
Information
Marine Biodiversity Records , Volume 7 , 2014 , e108
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barker, S.M. and Williamson, J.E. (2010) Collaborative photo-identification and monitoring of grey nurse sharks (Carcharias taurus) at key aggregation sites along the eastern coast of Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 61, 971–979.Google Scholar
Bullock, L.H., Murphy, M.D., Godcharles, M.F. and Mitchell, M.E. (1992) Age, growth, and reproduction of jewfish Epinephelus itajara in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Fisheries Bulletin 90, 243–249.Google Scholar
Buray, N., Mourier, J., Planes, S. and Clua, E. (2009) Underwater photo-identification of sicklefin lemon sharks, Negaprion acutidens, at Moorea (French Polynesia). Cybium 33, 21–27.Google Scholar
Cantor, M., Wedekin, L.L., Guimarães, P.R., Daura-Jorge, F.B., Rossi-Santos, M.R. and Simões-Lopes, P.C. (2013) Disentangling social networks from spatiotemporal dynamics: the temporal structure of a dolphin society. Animal Behaviour 84, 641–651. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.019.Google Scholar
Carlson, J.K., Gulak, S.J.B., Simpfendorfer, C.A., Grubbs, R.D., Romine, J.G. and Burgess, G.H. (2013) Movement patterns and habitat use of smalltooth sawfish, Pristis pectinata, determined using pop-up satellite archival tags. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. doi: 10.1002/aqc.2382.Google Scholar
Castro, A.L.F. and Rosa, R.S. (2005) Use of natural marks on population estimates of the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum, at Atol das Rocas Biological Reserve, Brazil. Environmental Biology of Fishes 72, 213–221.Google Scholar
Carvalho-Filho, A. (1999) Peixes: costa brasileira. São Paulo: Melro, 320 pp.Google Scholar
Domeier, M.L. and Nasby-Lucas, N. (2006) Annual re-sightings of photographically identified white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) at an eastern Pacific aggregation site (Guadalupe Island, Mexico). Marine Biology. doi: 10.1007/s00227-006-0380-7.Google Scholar
Eklund, A.M. and Schull, J. (2001) A stepwise approach to investigate the movement patterns and habitat utilization of goliath grouper, Epinephelus itajara, using conventional tagging, acoustic telemetry and satellite tracking. In Sibert, J.R. and Nielsen, J.L. (eds) Electronic tagging and tracking in marine fisheries. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer-Verlag, pp. 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giglio, V.J., Adelir-Alves, J., Gerhardinger, L.C., Grecco, F.C., Daros, F.A. and Bertoncini, A.A. (in press) Habitat use and abundance of goliath grouper Epinephelus itajara in Brazil: a participative survey. Neotropical Ichthyology.Google Scholar
Holmberg, J., Norman, B. and Arzoumanian, Z. (2009) Estimating population size, structure, and residency time for whale sharks Rhincodon typus through collaborative photo-identification. Endangered Species Research 7, 39–53.Google Scholar
Koenig, C.C., Coleman, F.C. and Kingon, K. (2011) Pattern of recovery of the goliath grouper Epinephelus itajara population in the southeastern US. Bulletin of Marine Science 87, 891–911.Google Scholar
Kousha, K., Thelwall, M. and Abdoli, M. (2012) The role of online videos in research communication: a content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, 1710–1727. doi: 10.1002/asi.22717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lara, M.R., Schull, J., Jones, D.L. and Allman, R. (2009) Early life history stages of goliath grouper Epinephelus itajara (Pisces: Epinephelidae) from Ten Thousand Islands, Florida. Endangered Species Research 7, 221–228.Google Scholar
Lembo, G., Fleming, I.A., Okland, F., Carbonara, P. and Spedicato, M.T. (1999) Site fidelity of the dusky grouper Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834) studied by acoustic telemetry. Marine Life 9, 37–43.Google Scholar
Lodi, L., Mayerhofer, L.C. and Monteiro-Neto, C. (2009) Evaluation of the video-identification technique applied to bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Cagarras Archipelago, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89, 1077–1081.Google Scholar
Luiz, O.J., Balboni, A.P., Kodja, G., Andrade, M. and Marum, H. (2008) Seasonal occurrences of Manta birostris (Chondrichthyes: Mobulidae) in southeastern Brazil. Ichthyological Research 56, 96–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A.D. and Pierce, S.J. (2012) The use and abuse of photographic identification in sharks and rays. Journal of Fish Biology 80, 1361–1379.Google Scholar
Meekan, M.G., Bradshaw, C.J.A., Press, M., Mclean, C., Richards, A., Quasnichka, S. and Taylor, J.G. (2006) Population size and structure of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) at Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 319, 275–285.Google Scholar
Murray, D.L. and Fuller, M.R. (2000) A critical review of the effects of marking on the biology of vertebrates. In Boitani, L. and Fuller, T.K. (eds) Research techniques in animal ecology. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 15–64.Google Scholar
Pina-Amargós, F. and González-Sansón, G. (2009) Movement of goliath grouper (Epinephelus itajara) in southeast Cuba: implications for its conservation. Endangered Species Research 7, 243–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speed, C.W., Meekan, M.G. and Bradshaw, C.J.A. (2007) Spot the match—wildlife photo-identification using information theory. Frontiers in Zoology 4. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-4-2.Google Scholar
Van Tienhoven, A.M., Den Hartog, J.E., Reijins, R.A. and Peddemors, V.M. (2007) A computer-aided program for pattern-matching of natural marks on the spotted raggedtooth shark Carcharias taurus. Journal of Applied Ecology 44, 273–280.Google Scholar
Wirtz, P. (2007) The return of the yellow grouper—annual migration and return to the same site by a xanthistic Mycteroperca fusca (Pisces: Serranidae). Aqua, International Journal of Ichthyology 13, 31–34.Google Scholar