Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:55:53.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First record of Campylaspis laevigata (Crustacea: Cumacea: Nannastacidae) in the Mediterranean Sea: redescription and ecological notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2012

Jordi Corbera ,
Bella S. Galil  and
Jean-Claude Sorbe
Jordi Corbera*
Affiliation:
Carrer Gran 90, 08310 Argentona, Catalonia, Spain
Bella S. Galil
Affiliation:
National Institute of Oceanography, Israel Oceanographic & Limnological Research, PO Box 80360, 31080 Haifa, Israel
Jean-Claude Sorbe
Affiliation:
Station Marine, UMR 5805 (CNRS/UB1), 2 rue Jolyet, 33120 Arcachon, France
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J. Corbera, Carrer Gran, 90, 08310 Argentona, Catalonia, Spain email: corberajordi@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

The nannastacid cumacean Campylaspis laevigata is reported for the first time in the Mediterranean Sea from specimens collected on the Israeli continental slope. This species is redescribed, based on specimens from the Bay of Biscay and the Mediterranean, and distinguished from the closely allied congeners Campylaspis glabra and Campylaspis nitens, both recorded from the Mediterranean. The three species have a smooth carapace, but may be distinguished by the structure and setation of the uropods: the inner margin of the peduncle is serrated in C. laevigata and C. nitens (not serrated in C. glabra), but the latter has more setae (6) on the endopodal inner margin and a rudimentary eyelobe. The known bathymetric distribution of C. laevigata ranges from 280 to 2000 m, and its highest abundances in the southern Bay of Biscay were found between 500 and 800 m, possibly related to food availability in the near-bottom environment.

Keywords

CampylaspisbathyalBay of BiscayMediterranean Sea
Type
Research Article
Information
Marine Biodiversity Records , Volume 5 , August 2012 , e106
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, G. (2010, 20 January) Cumacea taxa and literature. Available at http://peracarida.usm.edu/ (accessed 9 March 2012).Google Scholar
Bate, S. (1866) Nannastacidæ. The Record of the Zoological Literature 1865 2, 329.Google Scholar
Blazewicz-Paszkowycz, M. and Ligowski, R. (2002) Diatoms as food source indicator for some Antarctic Cumacea and Tanaidacea (Crustacea). Antarctic Science 14, 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnier, J.J. (1896) Édriophthalmes. Résultats scientifiques de la campagne du ‘Caudan' dans le Golfe de Gascogne, août–septembre 1895. Annales de l'Université de Lyon 26, 528–562.Google Scholar
Calman, W.T. (1905) The marine fauna of the west coast of Ireland, Part IV. Cumacea fisheries, Ireland. Scientific Investigations 1904 I, 1–52.Google Scholar
Calman, W.T. (1906) The Cumacea of the Puritan Expedition. Mittheilungen aus der Zoologischen Station zu Neaple 17, 411–432.Google Scholar
Cartes, J. and Sorbe, J.C. (1993) Les communautés suprabenthiques bathyales de la Mer Catalane (Méditerranée occidentale): données préliminaires sur la répartition bathymétrique et l'abondance des Crustacés Péracarides. Crustaceana 64, 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartes, J. and Sorbe, J.C. (1996) Temporal population structure of deep-water cumaceans from the western Mediterranean slope. Deep-Sea Research Part I 43, 1423–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartes, J. and Sorbe, J.C. (1997) Bathyal cumaceans of the Catalan Sea (north-western Mediterranean): faunistic composition, diversity and near-bottom distribution along the slope (between 389 and 1859 m). Journal of Natural History 31, 1041–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbera, J. and Galil, B.S. (2001) Cumaceans (Crustacea, Percarida) from the lower slope of the northern Israel coast, with a discussion on the status of Platysympus typicus . Israel Journal of Zoology 47, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elizalde, M., Sorbe, J.C. and Dauvin, J.C. (1993) Las comunidades suprabentónicas batiales del golfo de Vizcaya (margen sur del cañón de Cap-Ferret): composición faunística y estructura. Publicaciones Especiales del Instituto Español de Oceanografía 11, 247–258.Google Scholar
Elizalde, M., Weber, O., Pascual, A., Sorbe, J.C. and Etcheber, H. (1999) Benthic response of Munnopsurus atlanticus (Crustacea, Isopoda) to the carbon content of the near-bottom sedimentary environment on the southern margin of the Cap-Ferret Canyon (Bay of Biscay, north-eastern Atlantic Ocean). Deep-Sea Research II 46, 2331–2344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fage, L. (1929) Cumacés et Leptostracés provenants des campagnes scientifiques du Prince Albert 1er de Monaco. Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques Accomplies sur son Yacht par Albert 1er Prince Souverain de Monaco 77, 3–51.Google Scholar
Garm, A. (2004) Revising the definition of the crustacean seta and setal classification systems based on examinations of the mouthpart setae of seven species of decapods. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 142, 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, H.J. (1920) Crustacea Malacostraca, IV. The order Cumacea. Danish Ingolf Expedition 3, 1–86 (plts I–IV).Google Scholar
Jones, N.S. (1974) Campylaspis species (Crustacea: Cumacea) from the deep Atlantic. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology Series 27, 247–300.Google Scholar
Jones, N.S. (1976) British cumaceans, Arthropoda: Crustacea. Keys and notes for the identification of the species. Synopsis of the British fauna, No. 7, 62 pp.Google Scholar
Jones, N.S. (1984) The family Nannastacidae (Crustacea: Cumacea) from the deep Atlantic. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology Series 46, 207–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, N.S. (1985) Distribution of the Cumacea. In Laubier, L. and Monniot, C. (eds) Peuplements profonds du golfe de Gascogne: campagnes BIOGAS. Brest: IFREMER, pp. 429–433.Google Scholar
Kaestner, A. (1967) Crustacea. In Kaestner, A. (ed.) Lehrbuch der speziellen zoologie. 2nd edition. Stuttgart: Gustav Fisher Verlag, pp. 849–1242.Google Scholar
Kröyer, H. (1846) Im Cumaernes Familie. Naturhistorist Tidskrift, Raekke 2, 123–211.Google Scholar
Ledoyer, M. (1983) Contribution à l'étude de l'écologie de la faune vagile profonde de la Méditerranée nord-occidentale. II: Les cumacés (Crustacea). Tethys 11, 67–81.Google Scholar
Ledoyer, M. (1987) Les Cumacés méditerranéens profonds (Crustacea) des campagnes Biomedes I et II et Balgim. Synthèse de la distribution bathyale du groupe en Méditerranée occidentale. Mesogée 47, 59–70.Google Scholar
Lilljeborg, W. (1855) Om Hafs-Crustaceer vid Kullaberg i Skåne. Öfversigt af Kongliga Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar 12, 117–138.Google Scholar
Mühlenhardt-Siegel, U. (2009) Cumacea (Crustacea, Peracarida) in the deep Mediterranean, with the description of one new species. Zootaxa 2096, 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyss, D. (1972) Résultats scientifiques de la campagne du NO ‘Jean Charcot' en Méditerranée occidentale, mai-juin-juillet 1970 Cumacés. Crustaceana Supplement 3, 362–377.Google Scholar
Sars, G.O. (1865) Om den aberrante Kerbsdyrgruppe Cumacea og dens nordiske arter. Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-Selskabet i Christiania 1864, 128–208.Google Scholar
Sars, G.O. (1870) Nye Dybvandscrustaceer fra Lofoten. Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-Selskabet i Christiania 1869, 147–174.Google Scholar
Sars, G.O. (1879) Nye Bidrag til Kundskaben om Middelhavets Invertebratfauna. II. Middelhavets cumaceer. Archiv for Mathematik og Naturvidenskab 4, 1–128, 60 pls.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K. (1915) Isopoda, Tanaidacea, Cumacea, Amphipoda (excl. Hyperida). Report of the Danish Oceanographic Expedition 1908–10 to the Mediterranean and adjacent Seas 2, 29–34.Google Scholar
Watling, L. (1989) A classification system for crustacean setae based on the homology concept. Crustacean Issues 6, 15–26.Google Scholar
Watling, L. (2009) Biogeographic provinces in the Atlantic deep sea determined from cumacean distribution patterns. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 56, 1747–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar