Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:52:42.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Applications of Correlative Microscopy in Diagnostic and Investigative Pathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

D. N. Howell
Affiliation:
Departments of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC27710 and V. A. Medical Center, Durham, NC27705
S. E. Miller
Affiliation:
Departments of Microbiology and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC27710
Get access

Extract

Correlative microscopy is employed in a great variety of settings by both diagnostic and investigative pathologists. Combinations of conventional light microscopy (LM), immunohistology, and electron microscopy (EM) are used in a wide range of diagnostic settings, including the analysis of tumors, autoimmune disorders, and infectious diseases. Valuable diagnostic information is also frequently obtained by simultaneous or sequential examination of exfoliated or aspirated cell suspensions (cytopathology) and tissue sections (histopathology) from the same lesion. An even wider range of correlative microscopic methods is employed by pathologists in basic and clinical research. The rationales for using correlative techniques are many and varied, but in most cases fall within a limited number of categories.

Pathologists frequently use a second microscopic or preparative technique to improve on the resolution afforded by an initial technique. Electron microscopy is often used to refine the analysis of features initially detected by routine LM or immunohistology.

Type
Application of Classical and Novel Microscopy to Tissue Injury and Infectious Disease Pathogenesis
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Howell, D. N. et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35(1994)3308.Google Scholar
2.Liu, K. et al. Am J Kidney Dis 26(1995)520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ross, J. R. et al. Arch Ophthalmol 113(1995)340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Miller, S. E. et al. Ultrastruct Pathol 21(1997)183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Ahuja, V. et al. Cell Immunol 163(1995)59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Gravely, B. T. et al. Microsc Microanal Nov.(1994)33.Google Scholar
7. This research was supported in part by grants from the Department of Veterans Affairs.Google Scholar