Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:47:40.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Dental Finishing Instruments on the Surface Roughness of Composite Resins as Elucidated by Atomic Force Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2008

Ana Carolina Botta ,
Sillas Duarte Jr. ,
Pedro Iris Paulin Filho  and
Simoni Maria Gheno
Ana Carolina Botta
Affiliation:
Department of Restorative Dentistry, São José dos Campos School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Eng Francisco José Longo, 777, 12245-000, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil
Sillas Duarte Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Comprehensive Care, Case School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Cleveland, OH 44106-4905, USA
Pedro Iris Paulin Filho
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Km 235 Rod Washington Luiz, Postal Code 676, 13565-905, Brazil
Simoni Maria Gheno
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Km 235 Rod Washington Luiz, Postal Code 676, 13565-905, Brazil
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: sillas.duarte@case.edu
Get access

Abstract

Roughness increases significantly after finishing procedures. The aim of this study was to assess by the atomic force microscope (AFM) the effect of finishing instruments on the surface roughness of composite resins. A nanofiller composite resin (Filtek Supreme, 3M–F) and a microhybrid composite resin (Point 4, Kerr–P) were selected. The finishing procedures were done with a 30-blade carbide bur (C) and a 30-μm finishing diamond bur (D). Standardized specimens were produced and divided into six experimental groups (n = 4) according to (1) composite resin, (2) absence of finishing (Mylar matrix–M), and (3) finishing instrument (FM, PM, FC, FD, PC, PD). The mean surface roughness was evaluated by AFM in the contact mode. FM and PM groups were assessed statistically by the Student's T test, and FC, FD, PC, PD groups were submitted to variance analysis (ANOVA), both at 5% significance. The mean surface roughness values, in nanometers, were FM, 23.63 (b); FC, 283.88 (c); FD, 510.55 (d); PM, 12.52 (a); PC, 343.98 (c); PD, 531.64 (d). Microhybrid composite displayed less roughness than nanofiller composite in the absence of finishing procedures. The 30-blade carbide bur produced less roughness compared to the extra fine diamond bur.

Keywords

atomic force microscopysurface roughnesscarbide burdiamond burnanofiller composite resinmicrohybrid composite resinfinishing techniques
Type
Biological Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 14 , Issue 5 , October 2008 , pp. 380 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Attar, N. (2007). The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 8, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badra, V.V., Faraoni, J.J., Ramos, R.P. & Palma-Dibb, R.G. (2005). Influence of different beverages on the microhardness and surface roughness of resin composites. Oper Dent 30, 213–219.Google ScholarPubMed
Bagheri, R., Burrow, M.F. & Tyas, M. (2005). Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent 33, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berastegui, E., Canalda, C., Brau, E. & Miguel, C. (1992). Surface roughness of finished composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 68, 742–749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boghosian, A.A., Randolph, R.G. & Jekkals, V.J. (1987). Rotatory instrument finishing of microfilled and small-particle hybrid composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 115, 299–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, K. (1994). Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 10, 325–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferracane, J.L., Condon, J.R. & Mitchem, J.C. (1992). Evaluation of subsurface defects created during the finishing of composites. J Dent Res 71, 1628–1632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, J.B.D., Idowu, A. & Chan, S.S.F. (2003). Modified tips: Molecules to cells. Materials Today 6, 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guler, A.U., Kurt, S. & Kulunk, T. (2005). Effects of various finishing procedures on the staining of provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 93, 453–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habelitz, S., Marshall, S.J., Marshall, G.W. Jr. & Balooch, M. (2001). Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometre scale. Arch Oral Biol 46, 173–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, J.R., Jordan, J.H. & Watts, D.C. (1993). The effect of time of trimming on the surface finish of anterior composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 20, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heintze, S.D., Forjanic, M. & Rousson, V. (2006). Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as function of force and polishing time in vitro. Dent Mater 22, 146–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joniot, S.B., Grégoire, G.L., Auther, A.M. & Roques, Y.M. (2000). Three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis of surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins. Oper Dent 25, 311–315.Google ScholarPubMed
Jung, M., Baumstieger, M. & Klimek, J. (1997). Effectiveness of diamond-impregnated felt wheels for polishing a hybrid composite. Clin Oral Invest 1, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kakaboura, A., Fragouli, M., Rahiots, C. & Silikas, N. (2007). Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopes, G.C., Franke, M.F. & Maia, H.P. (2002). Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 88, 32–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lutz, F., Setcos, J.C. & Phillips, R.W. (1983). New finishing instruments for composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 107, 575–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, M., Antognozzi, M., Haschke, H., Hobbs, J., Humphris, A. & McMaster, T. (2003). Tour de force microscopy. Materials Today 6, 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagem Filho, H., D'azevedo, M.T.F.S., Nagem, H.D. & Marsola, F.P. (2003). Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Braz Dent J 14, 37–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozgunaltay, G., Yazigi, A.R. & Gorucu, J. (2003). Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth-coloured restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 30, 218–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paravina, R.D., Roeder, L., Lu, H., Vogel, K. & Powers, J.M. (2004). Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin composites. Am J Dent 17, 262–266.Google Scholar
Patel, S.B., Gordan, V.V., Barrett, A.A. & Shen, C. (2004). The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the color stability of resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 135, 587–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, A.F., Giannini, M., Lovadino, J.R. & Ambrosano, G.M. (2003). Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater 19, 12–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, A.F., Giannini, M., Lovadino, J.R. & Dias, C.T.S. (2002). The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites. Am J Dent 15, 193–197.Google ScholarPubMed
Roeder, L.B. & Powers, J.M. (2004). Surface roughness of resin composite prepared by single-use and multi-use diamonds. Am J Dent 17, 109–112.Google ScholarPubMed
Seitavuopio, P., Rantanen, J. & Yliruusi, J. (2003). Tablet surface characterization by various imaging techniques. Int J Pharm 254, 281–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silikas, N., Kavvadia, K., Eliades, G. & Watts, D. (2005). Surface characterization of modern resin composites: A multitechnique approach. Am J Dent 18, 95–100.Google ScholarPubMed
Silikas, N., Watts, D.C., England, K.E.R. & Jandt, K.D. (1999). Surface fine structure of treated dentine investigated with tapping mode atomic force microscopy (TMAFM). J Dent 27, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turkun, L.S. & Turkun, M. (2004). The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 29, 203–211.Google ScholarPubMed
Turssi, C.P., Ferracane, J.L. & Serra, M. (2005). Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures. Dent Mater 21, 641–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turssi, C.A., Saad, J.R.C., Duarte, S.L.L. Jr. & Rodrigues, A.L. Jr. (2000). Composite surfaces alter finishing and polishing techniques. Am J Dent 13, 136–138.Google Scholar
Uctasly, M.B., Arisu, H.D., Omürlü, H., Eligüzeloglu, E., Ozcan, S. & Ergun, G. (2007). The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 8, 89–96.Google Scholar
Van Dijken, J.W.V., Meurman, J.H. & Jarvinen, J. (1980). Effect of finishing procedures on surface textures of some resin restoratives. Acta Odontol Scand 38, 293–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y. & Chen, X. (2007). Carbon nanotubes: A promising standard for quantitative evaluation of AFM tip apex geometry. Ultramicroscopy 107, 293–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wennerberg, A., Ohlsson, R., Rosén, B.G. & Andersson, B. (1996). Characterizing three-dimensional topography of engineering and biomaterial surfaces by confocal laser scanning and stylus techniques. Med Eng Phys 18, 548–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilder, A.D. Jr., Swift, E.J. Jr., May, K.N. Jr., Thompson, J.Y. & McDougal, R.A. (2000). Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. J Dent 28, 367–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yannikakis, A.S., Zissis, A.J., Polyzois, G.L. & Caroni, C. (1998). Color stability of provisional resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 80, 33–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yap, A.U., Low, J.S. & Ong, L.F. (2000). Effect of food-simulating liquids on surface characteristics of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives. Oper Dent 25, 170–176.Google ScholarPubMed
Yap, A.U.J., Sau, C.W. & Lye, K.W. (1998). Effects of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth-coloured restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 25, 456–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yazici, A.R., Müftü, A. & Kugel, G. (2007). Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols. J Contemp Dent Pract 8, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed