Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:16:09.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electron Diffraction Based Analysis of Phase Fractions and Texture in Nanocrystalline Thin Films, Part II: Implementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

János L. Lábár
János L. Lábár*
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Technical Physics and Materials Science, H-1121 Budapest, Konkoly-Thege M. út 29-33, Hungary
*
E-mail: labar@mfa.kfki.hu
Get access

Abstract

This series of articles describes a method that performs (semi)quantitative phase analysis for nanocrystalline transmission electron microscope samples from selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns. Volume fractions of phases and their textures are obtained separately in the method. First, the two-dimensional SAED pattern is converted into an X-ray diffraction–like one-dimensional distribution. Volume fractions of the nanocrystalline components are determined by fitting the spectral components, calculated for the previously identified phases with a priori known structures. Blackman correction is also applied to take into account dynamic effects for medium grain sizes. Peak shapes and experimental parameters (camera length, etc.) are refined during the fitting iterations. Parameter space is explored with the help of the Downhill-SIMPLEX algorithm. Part I presented the principles, while Part II now elaborates current implementation, and Part III will demonstrate its usage by examples. The method is implemented in a computer program that runs under the Windows operating system on IBM PC compatible machines.

Keywords

electron diffractionSAEDring patternsnanocrystalsthin filmsphase fractionstexturequantitative analysisTEM
Type
Materials Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 20 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Lábár, J.L. (2000). ProcessDiffraction: A computer program to process electron diffraction patterns from polycrystalline or amorphous samples. Proc. EUREM 12, Brno, Czech Republic, July 9–14, 2000, Ciampor, Frank L. & Ciampor, L. (Eds.), Vol. III, pp. I379–I380.Google Scholar
Lábár, J.L. (2002). A tool to help phase identification from electron diffraction powder patterns. Microsc Anal 75, 9–11.Google Scholar
Lábár, J.L. (2005). Consistent indexing of a (set of) SAED pattern(s) with the ProcessDiffraction program. Ultramicroscopy 103, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lábár, J.L. (2008). Electron diffraction based analysis of phase fractions and texture in nanocrystalline thin films; Part I: Principles. Microsc Microanal 14(4), 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leapman, R. (1992). EELS quantitative analysis. In Transmission Electron Energy Loss Spectrometry in Materials Science, Disko, M.M., Ahn, C.C. & Fultz, B. (Eds.), pp. 47–83. Warrendale, PA: TMS.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J.J. & Schamber, F.H. (1981). Least-squares fit with digital filter: A status report. In Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry, NBS Special Publications 604, Heinrich, K.F.J., Newbury, D.E., Myklebust, R.L. & Fiori, C.E. (Eds.). Malcolm Bridge: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. & Flannery, B.P. (2007). Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar